Join For His Glory for a discussion on how
https://christianforums.net/threads/a-vessel-of-honor.110278/
https://christianforums.net/threads/psalm-70-1-save-me-o-god-lord-help-me-now.108509/
Read through the following study by Tenchi for more on this topic
https://christianforums.net/threads/without-the-holy-spirit-we-can-do-nothing.109419/
Join Sola Scriptura for a discussion on the subject
https://christianforums.net/threads/anointed-preaching-teaching.109331/#post-1912042
Strengthening families through biblical principles.
Focus on the Family addresses the use of biblical principles in parenting and marriage to strengthen the family.
Read daily articles from Focus on the Family in the Marriage and Parenting Resources forum.
Taniesh, I have enough therapists in my life.Then Rollon why are you so concerned over it? Does it challenge you.
The later translations are not re-writings of the KJV but other translations from the ancient text. The KJV also was a translation from ancient text.No matter what is assumed to be a reason to change the Bible it still should not be done. But since it has there is nothing we can do to change it only warn people of its deceiving nature. It causes too much confusion changing it and we were told not to do so.
Or, perhaps, if they didn't do it the way King James wanted it done.As a matter of fact King James had many scholars translate it from another language to English but if they messed up in the least little bit he had them killed. That was how serious King James wanted it right.
The later translations are not re-writings of the KJV but other translations from the ancient text. The KJV also was a translation from ancient text.
Or, perhaps, if they didn't do it the way King James wanted it done.
Well, go ahead, keep trying.Rollo I am not trying to be a therapist just someone who cares and I understand therapist can be quite aggravating. So what question do you want me to answer and I am sorry if I can't recall it right now but there are so many replies that I am trying to get to all as many as possible.
Of course it matters. That is what the discussion has been about for the last few pages. Calling Satan "Lucifer" leads people to misinterpret a passage of Scripture, mainly because of the KJV.Yes, and King James said "easter".
And King James said "calvary".
And King James said "flight of the Phoenix".
And who knows what else King James said and killed over.
Doesn't matter.
If people want to call Lucifer "satan" or satan "Lucifer", so what?
The question that should be discussed is "does it matter"?
And what is that interpretation?Of course it matters. That is what the discussion has been about for the last few pages. Calling Satan "Lucifer" leads people to misinterpret a passage of Scripture, mainly because of the KJV.
I don't see the big deal. His name was "son of the dawn/morning" before he became the accuser (devil/Satan).No. Satan is a real being, it's just that "his" name is not Lucifer.
-
God created Satan and Angels sinless, and with free will.
They chose to use their free will to sin, and became "fallen" thereby.....Just like Adam & Eve.
So, we cant Blame God for what choices Lucifer and Adam and fallen angels make.
To know Right but to choose WRONG creates evil.
So, the evil is in their choice to transgress, and not because that they were created evil.
They chose to transgress and then "evil is found IN THEM"
But just not as ancient as later translations worked from.The later translations are not re-writings of the KJV but other translations from the ancient text. The KJV also was a translation from ancient text.
And what you gave shows that the passage in Isa. is not referring to Satan.
I really do not think there is anyway of knowing if God gave this fallen angel a name or not, but man has given this angel many names that include Satan, Devil, Beelzebub, Belial, Adversary, Dragon, Serpent and various versions of day star as in these translations:Satan does exist.
But was his name ever Lucifer?
I really do not think there is anyway of knowing if God gave this fallen angel a name or not, but man has given this angel many names that include Satan, Devil, Beelzebub, Belial, Adversary, Dragon, Serpent and various versions of day star as in these translations:
Day Star son of David - The Oxford Annotated Bible
morning star son of the dawn - NIV
Lucifer son of the morning - NKJV
shining star of the dawn - James Moffatt Bible
Day star Son of Dawn - The Jerusalem Bible
Lucifer son of the morning - KJV
I agree. The name "Lucifer" has come into common English usage as being a name of Satan. No one is confused when he hears the name "lucifer."Just that whether or not his name is named in this passage seems irrelevant to me.
Clearly, that is exactly what you said.Clearly that is not what I was addressing.
No such being named "Lucifer". Not in the Bible anyway.