You are the best at avoiding anything direct and white wash everything with "your" philosophical idea...
You said to Reba that God "preordained" that Esau would disobey Him, that he "had no choice".
Again, you fail to know the difference between "foreordained" and "foreknowledge". Period...
No 'choice' of Esau would have made any difference. God hated Esau. No choice of Judas could have changed the uses of Satan 'in' Judas, which is the point of the exercise of observations.
It wasn't just Judas involved. Gods Spirit Determined in advance what was going to happen.
Satan in Judas resisted on cue.
Some freewillers have an imaginary scenario where God looked forward, saw all their supposed freewill choices, and then happens to 'insert' His Will therein allowing said 'free' will to be maintained as they must to hold their doctrine.
When there are obviously two other wills at play 'in man' the freewill premise is baloney as it makes no account for the Will of God and Satan that are assuredly involved 'in man.'
The will of Satan blocks this matter from sight. And does so by Gods Will and allowance.
Mark 4:15
And these are they by the way side,
where the word is sown; but when they have heard,
Satan cometh immediately, and taketh away the word that was sown
in their hearts.
What happened to Judas? Read the above. Jesus was not lying. What happened to Peter? Read the above.
God in not engaged in this present world only with men of flesh or their wills alone.
Ephesians 6:12
For
we wrestle not
against flesh and blood, but against
principalities, against
powers, against the
rulers of the darkness of this world, against
spiritual wickedness in high places.
There was a predetermined wrestling match done in Judas. That would be IN Judas.
Luke 22:3
Then entered Satan into Judas surnamed Iscariot, being of the number of the twelve.
Even in Judas surname, there is spiritual content of this exact matter. But those who can not see will not be shown it.
It will remain spiritually problematic for any reader to see this 'in man' because of the resistance of the other party factually 'in man,' just as Jesus spoke.
And even though the head on engagement of Jesus in Israel was with 'the real but unseen' culprits, few within theology engage that factual matter, nor can they.
s