cleanfreak
Member
- Feb 10, 2011
- 335
- 0
Awesome post montanaviking ![039_clap :clap :clap](/styles/default/xenforo/smilies/clap.gif)
![039_clap :clap :clap](/styles/default/xenforo/smilies/clap.gif)
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Join Hidden in Him and For His Glory for discussions on how
https://christianforums.net/threads/become-a-vessel-of-honor-part-2.112306/
Strengthening families through biblical principles.
Focus on the Family addresses the use of biblical principles in parenting and marriage to strengthen the family.
Read daily articles from Focus on the Family in the Marriage and Parenting Resources forum.
So you think although the term is not the best terminology to use, it still is representative of who the Holy Spirit is therefore you do use it? In other words you don`t think the term entirely misrepresents the Holy Spirit? Is that correct?
You know, farouk, I was taught this when I was in the Calvinist church. I left that church because when I examined the Scriptures too much of their theology didn't hold up...just saying in case people think I have a "thing" against Pentecostals or charismatics. I don't, I just like to verify things in the light of God's word.
But, I've come to the conclusion that the reasoning behind cessationism is faulty. Most cessationist maintain that since the Bible is now complete, infallible and more than adequate to guide the Church in all things (which it is)...there is no longer a need for spiritual gifts or miracles. And yet, in pointing to the infallibility of the Scriptures to support the idea that God no longer gives spiritual gifts or does miracles, they fail to see that the Scriptures do not say anywhere that the gifts were only going to be temporary. I think this is a bit illogical. If we are to point to the infallibility of the Scriptures (and I certainly believe the Scriptures are infallible) to justify all experiences, and the Scriptures validate spiritual gifts, why reject them as being "only temporary"?
This goes into a totally different topic though...one worthy of discussion, but probably not on this particular thread. ;)
The prhase is used to describe an experiance, I do not think that it is intended to represent the Holy Spirit for the Holy Spirit is so complex that one phrase cannot adequetly represent Him. But the phrase is not contradictory to the Holy Spirt.
Okay some people say this experience came because of the Holy Spirit. They feel they have fallen over because the Holy Spirit hit them and slayed their spirit. I have heard people describe it as such where the Holy Spirit hits them. But you are saying it is an experience that does not represent the Holy Spirit. That I can agree with. But I cannot agree with "the phrase is not contradictory to the Holy Spirit". I believe it is not only contradictory but also offensive if not blasphemous.
its 2011 maybe its time for a new name for it blissful grounding or something like that. A better name would make it less confusing and probably more appealing.I have been slain in the Spirit on several occasions. And they are the most intense and most blissful experiances of my life! Please read my other posts on this thread where i describe what happened to me.
Shalom
its 2011 maybe its time for a new name for it blissful grounding or something like that. A better name would make it less confusing and probably more appealing.
lol you are right christians take a while to change things it takes years for some things. I didnt even kow what it was. It was the what on earth was that experience to me.I agree! The problem is that if we abitrarily chang what it is called, we would have the problem of educating the rest of the body of Christ concerning the need for the change and what the new phrase is. thid could take quit a few years to do! But I am not sure wether or not this is of much concern for everyone else. So we may just have to live with what we have.
...But, if we do go back to the name of the church in Acts, we more staid types can be "Followers of the Way" and those of you who experience "slain in the Spirit" can be "Falling in the Way!"
:p With that it's obvious I need to get to bed and get some sleep!
Just checking in before going to bed, but I had to laugh at these past few posts...
Chris, Samuel...I've been thinking that the Church really needs to be called something other than Christians. I mean with what passes for "Christianity" these days...maybe a new name, or dusting off an old one like Followers of the Way (Acts 19).
But you've hit upon the same problem I did, getting the rest of the brethren on board with it.
But, if we do go back to the name of the church in Acts, we more staid types can be "Followers of the Way" and those of you who experience "slain in the Spirit" can be "Falling in the Way!"
:p With that it's obvious I need to get to bed and get some sleep!
Lol funny handy luv it!Just checking in before going to bed, but I had to laugh at these past few posts...
Chris, Samuel...I've been thinking that the Church really needs to be called something other than Christians. I mean with what passes for "Christianity" these days...maybe a new name, or dusting off an old one like Followers of the Way (Acts 19).
But you've hit upon the same problem I did, getting the rest of the brethren on board with it.
But, if we do go back to the name of the church in Acts, we more staid types can be "Followers of the Way" and those of you who experience "slain in the Spirit" can be "Falling in the Way!"
:p With that it's obvious I need to get to bed and get some sleep!
...slain in the spirit = carpet charismatic
we gotta laugh at ourselves. I was joking with that thinking up new names for things:D:D:D Oh yeah, when the rest of the folks wake up n the morning, I'm going to be dodging the rocks!!!:D:D:D
Oh man, Handy! I think I'll call myself "Falling out of the Way" of the rocks that are going to be thrown at you for that one:D:D:D