Therefore Jesus came not to destroy the law but to complete, fill up abundantly lacking nothing, consumated, accomplished and brought to realization all that the law had to offer. Jesus kept the entire law, and was the only one able to keep the law, therefore, Jesus completed the law whereby it lacked nothing. There is absolutely nothing that Jew or Gentile could do to accomplish anything more obeying the law than was already accomplished by Jesus Christ. Today those that are born of God are not under the law which was completed by Jesus Christ, but we are under grace. Those that are born of God are baptized into Jesus Christ into His death, so that as we are buried with him, we are raised from the dead just as he was. We walk in the newness of life because Jesus fulfilled the law. The law did not have to be destroyed, because Jesus completed the law. Those that believe the Word of God and are born of God have been baptized into Jesus' death and resurrection by the Holy Spirit. Paul explains this message plainly in Romans.
You've done it again. Inserted your opinion into a scripture I have read a million times. I didn't ask you to tell me WHERE he said he was going to fulfill the Torah or what "pleroo" meant. I asked you to tell me HOW he did it, WITH SCRIPTURE. You quoted the scripture. Fine. You told me how he did it...not so good. Why? You didn't tell me HOW with SCRIPTURE. You just said stuff like this:
"There is absolutely nothing that Jew or Gentile could do to accomplish anything more obeying the law than was already accomplished by Jesus
Christ."
And so basically, as I expected, you are saying that he "fulfilled" it so we don't have to keep it. But that is NOT what that means. Please prove to me, WITH SCRIPTURE how that is what that means. Because he also mentioned the PROPHETS. So if he fulfilled Torah AND prophets, by YOUR OWN logic, there is nothing we could gain from reading or heeding the prophets either. Once again, you have failed in answering my question. Also, Romans is AGAINST your point. Being "under the law" does not mean "obey Torah". Being "under the law" is under the "law of sin" outlined Romans 7. And the "law of sin" is YOU being condenmed by the Torah because of your FLESH. Paul said we should NOT sin in that Romans 6 you posted because we are not "under the law". What is sin? Trangression of Torah (1 John 3:4). So you are left with a dilemma. Sorry, but you have basically repeated yourself and have again failed to thoroughly WITH SCRIPTURE answer my questions. Just quoting scripture does not prove your point.
You are in error because you are attempting to bypass Jesus' work on the cross, so that you yourself can accomplish through the law what Jesus completed in his life, and on the cross, and in his resurrection, and in his ascension.
Yet more false accusation.
To you the scriptures that I quoted were irrelevant because they did not match your interpretation. On one post you say that the sabbath is a day set aside for no work and rest, and in the next post you say that the sabbath is not related to the rest indicated in Hebrews 4, and then in the next post you speak of keeping the sabbath holy along with every day, and the next post................who knows what you will claim next.
And here you go again doing exactly as I predicted. Making more claims like "they did not match your interpretation". They had NOTHING TO DO WITH what I was asking. And you basically accused me of more lies here. What I said and KEEP saying is that the sabbath is a commandment for us to keep on the seventh day, of course. You got that part right. As far as Hebrews, I said Hebrews 4 was not a chapter about sabbath day keeping VERSUS the rest that is TO COME. And lastly, you keep saying this nonsense about "now we are supposed to be holy everyday". I am saying that OF COURSE WE ARE SUPPOSED TO BE HOLY EVERYDAY. But that does not mean we do not rest on the sabbath because the sabbath was never the only day you are supposed to be holy. More false accusations and comparing apples and oranges on your part.
The Sabbath day commandment was given to the Israelites in Exodus, and not given before.
You don't know this. And also, the new covenant was given to ISRAELITES. Bad excuse, weak argument.
The seventh day is mentioned in the creation as God resting, just as it is mentioned in Hebrews 4 designating that believers should cease from their own works as God ceased from His work at creation. Simple.
Simple enough, but when does that mean we do not have to keep the sabbath? And the rest we are supposed get is yet FUTURE as I point out according to Hebrews 4:6, Hebrews 4:9, and Hebrews 4:11. You do not listen.
This is precisely the point. Your understanding of salvation is dependent upon your ability to keep commandments, and the truth of the matter is that your keeping any commandments will not gain you access into the Kingdom of God. The only way that you will see or enter the Kingdom of God is by being born of God. If you do not accomplish this process, then you will see an eternity apart from God no matter how many Sabbath's you keep.
Yet again more of your false accusations are represented here. My understanding of salvation is by grace through faith in Yahshua our Messiah. And after that is established, to OBEY him.
Your problem is that you think we do not have to obey Torah (which you have not proven). And what you don't understand is that if you don't obey, you WILL NOT be saved and will be exposed as a hypocrite and a person who does not know Messiah Yahshua. Please read Matthew 7:21-23.
Oh, I think that Nicodemus was very well grounded in the Torah, as was Paul as he was persecuting believers.
Irrelevant. And you, once again, ignored my point. He asked him how he could be a teacher and not know you have to be born again (John 3:10). That implies that he DID NOT KNOW TORAH ENOUGH. Being "born again" is not a new concept introduced by Yahshua. Please read Deuteronomy 10:16 for one reference.
The future sabbath rest that you are so assured of is not future at all, thus your error and flawed understanding.
That's great that you know how to repeat my words ("error" and "flawed") but it is to bad you do not explain why with scripture.
The rest that is equated to God's rest during creation is attributed to the rest in Jesus Christ through faith. The rest that is spoken of is not the one day per week sabbath. No it is the spiritual rest given those born of God in Jesus Christ, the rest depicted by the rest for the Israelites in the wilderness that they failed to obtain because of unbelief. Your understanding of the sabbath is flawed, and your determination of it being a sign as one being a child of God is flawed, for some of those that kept the seventh day in the wilderness, did not enter into God's rest because of unbelief.
You did not answer one of my questions or refutations othe than with these opinions. Please use scripture.
You keep the Torah if you want to, but remember to keep the entire Torah. Where does God tell you in the Word that you can just keep a portion of the Torah? Where does God tell you in the Word that you do not have to abide by the entire levitical law?
All 613 commandments don't apply to one person, I hope you know. And I hope you know there is provision in the Torah, prophets, and in the Psalms that establish Messiah as our High Priest. I do not have to abide by Levitical law because they became corrupt. And if the priest become corrupt, their priesthood is taken from them (Leviticus 21:17-24, Leviticus 22:2-9; Zechariah 3:1-10).
And it is nice that you can form your own opinions and make comments like above, but you have to use SCRIPTURE to prove or disprove a point in a SCRIPTURAL debate. You fail yet again at answering or explaining. Just more of your false accusations and more comments like above..
I have shown you, where I am not under the law, but under grace. I rest in Jesus Christ's work just as he taught.
Yet again you take the Matthew out of context. And I am not "under law" either. Sadly, you do not know what this means.
No where did I say that those who keep the sabbath are not holy. I said that if you are going to keep one day holy, you are in error, for everyday should be kept holy unto God for God now lives inside everyone that is born of God.
You keep saying this. How is a day kept holy? There is only one day that can be kept holy (the day being set-apart, not the people) and those are the days that Yahweh has APPOINTED. The sabbath is an appointed time we rest on, and that is how it is kept sanctified. As far as PEOPLE being holy, we are to be holy by obedience everday. Once again, you compare apples with oranges.
Hebrews 4 says that as God rested on the seventh day, we who believe should rest by ceasing from our own works. Every day should be a holy day of worshipping God.
That rest is yet future, as I proved by listing various Hebrews 4 scriptures. So we work now till we get there. Everyday, however, is not a set-apart day. Everyday WE are supposed to be set-apart, but absolutely NOTHING in Hebrews 4 says everyday is a set-apart day. You are SUPERIMPOSING that into the context. Where does is say that? And you failed to answer my question (no surprise) about verse 8. You also failed to explain how the sabbath should not be kept according to Hebrews 4 or how Hebrews 4 is sabbath vs. spiritual rest. And, for that matter, you have failed to explain with Hebrews 4 how it says anything about "Jesus" being our rest as opposed to the sabbath. He is our rest, but his rest has nothing to do with it being versus the sabbath day. You keep SAYING IT, but have not PROVEN IT. You take me to a scripture and put your FEELINGS into to it. You don't show how the scripture states it.
Where do you get off thinking that only one day is a day of resting from your own works so that you can worship God.
Comparing apples and oranges again. We are to do Yahweh's works everday. But only one day is the sabbath of rest from labor (earthly labor/job/occupation) and an appointed time for believers to gather (along with the feasts). You are putting things where they do not apply. The problem is, you don't see it and keep repeating the same thing...
Your dilemma is that you do not understand worship or rest, and you don't know who fulfilled the law so you did not have to.
So you finally stated, after about ten times of my asking, what Messiah's "fulfill the law" statement was about (although I knew the whole time what you were going to say). However, you have not proven this with scripture. So please, take this and prove it with scripture, as I have asked several times. We all have our opinions, but if it is not backed by scripture, please do not tell me what I do not understand.
You keep changing apples to oranges and then back to apples, but the bottom line is that the Keeping of the Sabbath was given to the Israelites as the Law of Moses, and Jesus completed the law so abundantly that you and I and all believers did not have to.
I'm looking for your supporting scripture, give me a minute...
I didn't find it.
wavy said:
Yahshua is rest, but not rest as opposed to the sabbath day. You have NOT proven that with scripture. And again, what does it mean for him to have "fulfilled the law"? Explain with SCRIPTURE please, please, PLEASE.
I have, over and over.
In your head you have.
The Israelites went to the synagog on the Sabbath and God dwelt in the Holy of Holies at the Temple, but now that God dwells right inside of all who are born of God, they should worship God every day by their ceasing from their own works, and every day should be kept holy. One of these days if I keep repeating over and over again, God can use this truth to make a dent in your stubborness and lack of understanding what he is saying to you in the Word of God.
Why are you making things up? Sabbath in a synagogue came only after return from Babylonian captivity. Tell me where, in Torah, does it say anything about where Israelites are supposed to be in the temple on the sabbath to watch Yahweh come down. You won't be able to find it. Your opinions are nice. But scripture doesn't support made up doctrine, I hope you know.
Not comparing apples and oranges. Taking your definition of sabbath up keep and explaining that Hebrews 4 makes it plain that we are to cease from our own works and be about the works of God, and not go to the chuch on saturday passing through some litergy here and there because we decided on our own that because God did not work on the seventh day, then we should not work either. Hebrews 4 does not explain God's rest as the Sabbath keepers do. No wonder you want to look at Hebrews 4 in a different light.
Hebrews 4, and this is the last time I will say this, talks about a future rest. Please show me why verses 4, 9, and 11 aren't future. And please tell me why we do not have to keep the sabbath because of something future. Show me the conflict. And please tell me why the scripture said Yahweh commanded the sabbath because he rested on the seventh day, and not the we "decided" to rest on the seventh because he did. You are lying. And again, let me look for scripture that said the sabbath was a decision...
I didn't find any.
And your other error is assuming we think true spiritual fulfillment is keeping the sabbath and that Yahshua is not rest. We keep the sabbath as it is given to us because it was commanded. But Yahshua as "rest" has to do with the YOKE of MEN, not "rest" as in sabbath rest. The sabbath is a day, not a person. Please tell me in scripture where Messiah says that he is the sabbath, or that even if he is, that means we do not have to keep the literal day (you won't find it, trust me). Keeping the sabbath is not "our own works" as you seem to be asserting. The sabbath belongs to Yahweh and it his HIS work if we obey it to keep it as he commanded.
Jesus kept the sabbath day because he was Jewish and under the law. I am not under the law, and if you are born of God, you are not under the law either. If you keep the law then you better keep the whole law or you are wasting your time.
So he was not "born of God"? Don't you realize how stupid this sounded?
#1. "Jesus" was under the law.
#2. Those born of God are not under the law.
#3. "Jesus" must not have been born of God.
As far as your "whole law" excuse, we keep it as a lifestyle. We are not required to go without sinning or be damned. We are required to do it in faithful obedience, however, and love (John 14:15, 1 John 5:1-3). Torah keeping is a lifestyle, done in love and obedience to Yahweh. It is not a means of salvation. If, however, you are referring to your Levitical priesthood excuse, that has already been exposed as error.
Galatians is against your point, btw. If we do not continue (as a lifestyle in perseverance) in all the things written in Torah, we are cursed. You reject it. You must therefore be cursed.
wavy said:
Solo said:
The Word of God tells us that the eating of food, drinking of drinks, holy days, new moons, sabbath days are a shadow of things to come.
They are. And this is a good thing, because we are not in the "to come" yet. So we show forth was is to come to the world by the feasts, shabbats, new moons, etc.
It is nice that you can use a lot of space posting scripture, but if you want true understanding of Colossians 2, read my thread on it and refute that. As also my thread on how Messiah fulfilled the scriptures. I've read Colossians. I do not need you to quote it to me. I know what it is saying. You have problems understanding that quoting a scripture does not mean you are right (especially when the scripture is irrelevant to the point). You must take that scripture and use what it says and tell us why, directly, it backs up your point in light of other scripture. You cannot just quote it and merely expect and hope it to agree with you.
You do not keep the Torah either. You keep what is convienent for you to keep.
Wrong. We learn and we grow in the grace of Messiah and obedience to his Torah. If we stumble, we ask for forgivness and repent and pick it back up. Don't tell me how I keep Torah. Now you are getting ridiculous (as if that did not start a long time ago, lol). More false accusations.
The Sabbath day is kept holy by your own opinion, and you cease from vocational work, but continue in your own works apart from God's will.
So I guess Yahweh lied when he told us to keep it holy. And who said I continue in my own works apart from his will? Torah is his will (if you have brotherly love and trust in Yahweh). Do you have a hidden camera in my room or that follows me around that shows you how I conduct myself?
Jesus completed the law, and as we abide in him, we are about God's work, not our own.
This was my point. You don't know me. How is keeping the sabbath doing my own work (although Yahweh commanded it)? Or how because I keep the sabbath am I forgetting about Yahweh every other day? More error and false accusations and false dichotomies on your part. And your "complete" the law excuse is flawed because you have not proven it.
But in case you refuse to read my thread on this, I am going to ask you a question: Do we have to be righteous or heed the Word of Yahweh?
Because Messiah fulfilled (pleroo) all righteousness in Matthew 3:15. Paul fulfilled (pleroo) the Word of Yahweh according to Colossians 1:25. What is your answer?
It is not some let's copy the Israelites way of life according to the Old Testament that Jesus was our example to follow. Why would he have us follow the law when we are now under grace; and why would he have had to die on the cross if man was able to keep the law?
This is not copying the Israelites. This is obeying Yahweh and becoming part of his elect (Israel). And your comment about following Torah vs. grace is flawed because being "under law" has nothing to do with obeying it. Being under law has to do with sin having dominion over us. Having grace from Yahweh is that sin forgiven us because of Messiah. However, we do not sin (break Torah; 1 John 3:4) because of grace (Romans 6:1-2, Romans 6:15).
As for the reason he died, it was to reunite Israel and Judah (Jerermiah 31:31-34) remarry one bride of Israel (Hosea 2; Romans 7:1-4) redeem all from Torah-less-ness (Titus 2:14), and allow Ephraim to be graffed back into the fold along with all nations who believe on the name of Yahshua (Ezekiel 37:16-28). He also died so the Spirit could be given. The Spirit is given because of our flesh, which breaks Torah. Now that we have the Spirit and the righteousness and atonement of Messiah that saves, we can become Yahweh workmanship (Ephesians 2:10) and walk in his Torah without being cursed if we stay faithful (Ezekiel 36:27).
Your ole corrupt, mortal flesh combats your ability to walk in the Spirit 100% of the time day in and day out, and your finite mind is not able to remember or know the sins that you commit by trying to keep the Torah.
This is irrelevant to any point. "Trying" is not the issue. You are preaching the "you will fail, don't try" doctrine. We do sin and stumble at Torah, but we have hope because of Messiah. Sin does not mean "don't keep Torah". Sin means you just need atonement and the good heart to do it willingly and joyfully to obey Yahweh. That's how David felt (Psalm 1 & Psalm 119).
Plenty of scripture was given. Hebrews 3 and 4 is sufficient to gain a complete understanding of the rest and the ceasing of our works as we abide in Christ Jesus.
***sigh***
I know you haven't read the scriptures that I designated one million times because the Word of God does not return void, and in your understanding of God's word as it pertains to salvation and the sabbath and the law and grace, you are still void in those areas. You might try reading each of those scriptures again until you can see the truth of the Word of God, and I guarantee you that it won't take a million times for God's Word to reveal the absolute truth.
And here you are again. You are not elaborating. I can make a perfect example of your "teaching" method.
You: "We do not have to keep the 'law', see because 'Jesus' fulfilled it".
Me: "Well, how did he fulfill it?"
You (after I have asked many times): "He fulfilled it so we don't have to keep it. See, this scripture says he fulfilled it".
Me: "I know the scripture says he fulfilled it. HOW did he fulfill it? And where is the scripture to back up how he did it? You are not giving me scripture that shows where it is indicated that we do not have to keep Torah because he 'fulfilled' it".
You: "You have to be born of God. What is so hard for you to understand? We are under grace, not the 'law'".
All the while, never answering my question. Another example of what you did with Hebrews 4 (in essence):
You: "We do not have to keep the sabbath because 'Jesus' is our rest. We have spiritual rest in 'Jesus'. We cease from our own works and do God's everyday. See, it says it here in Hebrews 4."
Me: "Tell me how Hebrews 4 says we do not have to keep the sabbath. A conflict is not being made between sabbath day keeping and any spiriutal rest in 'Jesus'. That is not what Hebrews says. Hebrews says the rest is yet future. Read Hebrews 4:6, Hebrews 4:9, and Hebrews 4:11."
You: "The sabbath rest is not future."
Me: "You say that, but explain to me why not. Read those verses. Tell me what the rest as opposed to the coming rest is in Hebrews 4:8"
You: "I have explained it. You must be born of God. You are a sabbath keeper that is trying to keep one day holy when everyday is holy because of rest in 'Jesus' You don't understand. You are trying to be saved by keeping the 'law'".
Me: "No you haven't explained anything. You just say that's what it says. And of course we are supposed to be holy everyday. It was always supposed to be this way. The sabbath is not against being holy everyday. You are comparing apples and oranges".
You: "You do not understand the scriptures with your fleshy mind. The sabbath is not the true rest. True rest is 'Jesus', not the commandments of men".
Me: "The sabbath is not a commandment of men. We keep the sabbath because Yahweh commanded it. You still fail to show how Hebrews 4 says this. Yahshua is a rest, but NOT opposed to the sabbath. His rest has nothing to do with sabbath day keeping. His rest was in the context of rest from the world and from the traditions of men. He showed this in Matthew 12 where he rebuked the Pharisees for forbidding good on the sabbath. Yahshua was clearly alluding to Jeremiah 6:16, for the simple fact that there cannot be two 'rests' for our souls. You are in error and your interpretation is flawed. You have not explained how Hebrews 4 or Matthew 11 does away with the sabbath."
You: "You do not understand the scriptures. I clearly showed you from Hebrews 4. The rest is not future. The rest is right now in 'Jesus' as we rest from our own works and do God's work everyday and worship him everday."
Me: "That is now what Hebrews says. Prove that with scripture. Hebrews talks about a FUTURE rest according to the verses I showed you. Hebrews is not conflicting the sabbath day with a spiritual rest. It uses the sabbath as an example of how we are to work until we get to that rest. Read those verses. You are not backing your point up with scripture. You are just saying the scripture supports you. Answer my questions."
You: "You must be born of God. You do not understand. How do you not see it? Everyday is rest and kept holy. We cease from our own works and do God's everyday. Hebrews 4 says it. "
Me: "Hebrews 4 does not say that..."
You see?
Again, this one is special:
9 So then they which be of faith are blessed with faithful Abraham. 10 For as many as are of the works of the law are under the curse: for it is written, Cursed is every one that continueth not in all things which are written in the book of the law to do them. 11 But that no man is justified by the law in the sight of God, it is evident: for, The just shall live by faith. 12 And the law is not of faith: but, The man that doeth them shall live in them. 13 Christ hath redeemed us from the curse of the law, being made a curse for us: for it is written, Cursed is every one that hangeth on a tree: 14 That the blessing of Abraham might come on the Gentiles through Jesus Christ; that we might receive the promise of the Spirit through faith. Galatians 3:9-14
It is. But it does not prove your point. What is this scripture saying and how does it apply with what you want to believe?
Anyway, I'm done. Fruitless to argue with some one that doesn't even use scripture to back points.