If we are justified of Christ while sinning, then that Christ aproves the sinning.
Gal 2:17But if, while we seek to be justified by Christ, we ourselves also are found sinners, is therefore Christ the minister of sin? God forbid.
Which is not Jesus Christ, nor includes me.
Moral relativism includes sinning against Christ not having the same affect as before. It comes from relative repentance in general, that has the effect of only sinning less than before... generally speaking.
That also includes a relativism between people, so that sinning against Christ does not have the same effect on their souls. Such as on some souls sinning in the name of Christ, and on other souls sinning without naming His name at all.
It's called the hypocrisy of an unjust judge and Christ, that justifies friends and family transgressors, while condemning strangers doing the same things.
The hypocrisy of justification by one's faith alone is rightly known by all in the world, so that the grace of Christ is blasphemed thereby.
Rom 2:23Thou that makest thy boast of the law, through breaking the law dishonourest thou God?For the name of God is blasphemed among the Gentiles through you, as it is written.
The effect the soul by sin remains the same: The soul that sins dies to God, and the wages of sin is death to Christ. It is without respect of time, nor of people.
Rom 2:3And thinkest thou this, O man, that judgest them which do such things, and doest the same, that thou shalt escape the judgment of God? Or despisest thou the riches of his goodness and forbearance and longsuffering; not knowing that the goodness of God leadeth thee to repentance?
But after thy hardness and impenitent heart treasurest up unto thyself wrath against the day of wrath and revelation of the righteous judgment of God; Who will render to every man according to his deeds:
For there is no respect of persons with God.
Sinning against God has the same common effect upon all souls of men, that was from the beginning when the first Adam transgressed, and made himself the first child of disobedience on earth.
Good point. The warning is to be utterly rid of the lukwarm doer of both good and evil. They are dead branches not yet cut off to be cast into the fire.
Jhn 15:5I am the vine, ye are the branches: He that abideth in me, and I in him, the same bringeth forth much fruit: for without me ye can do nothing. If a man abide not in me, he is cast forth as a branch, and is withered; and men gather them, and cast them into the fire, and they are burned.
They are sinning tares among the righteous wheat:
Mat 13:30Let both grow together until the harvest: and in the time of harvest I will say to the reapers, Gather ye together first the tares, and bind them in bundles to burn them: but gather the wheat into my barn.
It's the same space of warning to false apostles, prophets, and teachers:
Rev 2:20Notwithstanding I have a few things against thee, because thou sufferest that woman Jezebel, which calleth herself a prophetess, to teach and to seduce my servants to commit fornication, and to eat things sacrificed unto idols.
And I gave her space to repent of her fornication; and she repented not. Behold, I will cast her into a bed, and them that commit adultery with her into great tribulation, except they repent of their deeds.
Fornicators naming the name of Christ are not in Christ Jesus, nor members of His body, but are the doers of dead works mixed among the good.
They are warned to repent before Christ has them separated from the assembly of saints.
1Co 5:11But now I have written unto you not to keep company, if any man that is called a brother be a fornicator, or covetous, or an idolater, or a railer, or a drunkard, or an extortioner; with such an one no not to eat.
Either the lukewarm tares cut out from a church, or the whole church is cast away from the righteous congregations of God.
They are Scriptures applied to contradict the arguments, point by point. What's not being made is any response to perhaps show how they don't rightly apply.
The Scriptures given aren't even mentioned, much less the contradictions by them.
In general excludes something ever being all explicit. Lukewarm is some explicit and some not so explicit.
In gernal mean sort of on the whole.
The argument is not about the hearers in general, but about the Lord's commandment being explicit, not in general.
The command is for all the tree to be made good or evil, and for all transgressions to be repented of.
How many hearers do the word in general is not the argument.
God at times speaks of things in general and explicitly. His commands are always explicitly, and never taken as only a general principle by the will of men.
Generally walking as Jesus, doing both good and evil, is not walking as Jesus walked. Jesus never did evil.
Generally walkiing as He walked, is judged as worse than not walking as Jesus at all.
Luk 6:46And why call ye me, Lord, Lord, and do not the things which I say?
Rev{3:15} I know thy works, that thou art neither cold nor hot: I would thou wert cold or hot. {3:16} So then because thou art lukewarm, and neither cold nor hot, I will spue thee out of my mouth.