No, they don’t. I have never heard or read anyone teach that.
It does not mean no one has taught that.
And it largely comes down to not understanding what justification actually means, or at least that there is more than one meaning.
Exactly. There is more than one teaching on justification by faith alone, even as more than one teachiung on water baptism in the name of Christ, more than one on the second coming of Christ, etc...
You have some fundamental misunderstandings about Christian doctrine
2. Focus on the issue being discussed. Do not direct your comments toward the member and make the discussion personal if you disagree with what's been said.
6. Do not use phrases such as, “You’re wrong,” or any other similar phrase. This is insulting and inappropriate and there are nicer ways to disagree without being insulting.
If the moderators don't keep their own rules, how can they expect others to.
that you need to get right so you stop misrepresenting those you disagree with.
Now you resort to personal accusations, that make no sense. Who have I misrepresented that I don't agree with? Certainly not the ones that have preached justification without repentance. Nor you, since you have only got angry about it, and have taught anything for yourself.
You might find you actually do agree with them once you understand correctly.
Not with them that preach justification by faith alone, without repentance, nor any works ever having to do with being justified by their faith alone. Which you also obviously disagree with, and apparently can't even believe any Christian believer would ever teach such a thing.
I didn't either, until I heard it for myself. Some even say all their past, present, and future sins are already forgiven, once they believe on the name of Jesus Christ.
Because you don’t understand what “faith alone” means, and that despite repeated attempts to correct you.
Once again, you're not making any sense to me. You haven't even attempted to teach your doctrine on faith alone, much less correct me on what you would teach about it.
2. Focus on the issue being discussed. Do not direct your comments toward the member and make the discussion personal if you disagree with what's been said.
6. Do not use phrases such as, “You’re wrong,” or any other similar phrase. This is insulting and inappropriate and there are nicer ways to disagree without being insulting.
The rules, that you are supposed to know and adhere to above all others, are in place specifically so that believers who disagree over doctrine, spend quality time on the Scriptural disagreement, and useless time on personal observations, accusations, and insults about one another.
And this is pretty much exactly what justification by faith alone teaches.
You agree I know the Scriptural teaching of imputed righteousness without works.
But it's not at all the same as justification by faith alone, with or without repentance.
See, you do agree, you just so misunderstand the doctrine, willingly at this point,
Last warning. This is a false accusation of my character and purposes.
2. Focus on the issue being discussed. Do not direct your comments toward the member and make the discussion personal if you disagree with what's been said.
I never willingly 'misunderstand' what others say, but the opposite. I actually give more attention to detail withj them, that I don't already agree with. If they can correct me by Scripture, than that's great. The teaching of Christ is better perfected. And if not, then I learn more about what not to teach. It's why I am so acquainted with some teachings of others, that some believers have never even heard of.
that you think it’s different from what you believe.
What I believe is different, is imputed righteousness without works, vs justification by faith alone.
