Those reborn of God's seed crucified their old man/sinful nature.Again, please take my comments and arguments in context. I am the one saying that Christians continue to struggle with sin, by which I clearly mean, that they actually still sin.
That is not a sufficient answer. You are now arguing to an incorrect understanding of what I have said in an attempt to support your previous argument. You still have not given any Scripture to support anything.
Anyone can quote Scripture. What does that mean? What is Paul saying with that statement?
No. Your conclusion doesn't follow. The command was to prevent them from sinning, yet they sinned, despite being sinless beforehand. The important point to note here is that they were sinless, in the Garden of Eden, having direct communion and communication with God. And yet they still sinned.
How much more then do believers, who have a sinful nature but are saved from the power of sin, and who still live in a sinful world, need commands to not sin, to try and prevent them from sinning and encourage them not to sin?
Gal 5:24..."And thy that are Christ's have crucified the flesh with the affections and lusts."
Ceasing from sin isn't "automatic."But, again, those commands are pointless if, as Hopeful 2 believes, believers automatically stop sinning.
It is the result of turning from sin, the death of the old man, rebirth from God's seed, and following the Spirit of God's leading.
The repentant will spend the rest of their lives resisting temptation.
You are defending the version of a religion where it doesn't matter if you love God or neighbor with all your heart, soul, mind, and strength.With all due respect, I don't think you fully grasp this discussion and Hopeful 2's position. And your analogy to the barking dog misses the mark.