Deavonreye
Member
- Sep 4, 2010
- 1,257
- 0
- Thread starter
- #21
Did Adam and Eve have an understanding/knowledge of what it meant to "be disobedient"?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Join For His Glory for a discussion on how
https://christianforums.net/threads/a-vessel-of-honor.110278/
https://christianforums.net/threads/psalm-70-1-save-me-o-god-lord-help-me-now.108509/
Strengthening families through biblical principles.
Focus on the Family addresses the use of biblical principles in parenting and marriage to strengthen the family.
Read daily articles from Focus on the Family in the Marriage and Parenting Resources forum.
Genesis 2:16-17 And the LORD God commanded the man, saying, Of every tree of the garden thou mayest freely eat: But of the tree of the knowledge of good and evil, thou shalt not eat of it: for in the day that thou eatest thereof thou shalt surely die.Did Adam and Eve have an understanding/knowledge of what it meant to "be disobedient"?
Genesis 2:16-17 And the LORD God commanded the man, saying, Of every tree of the garden thou mayest freely eat: But of the tree of the knowledge of good and evil, thou shalt not eat of it: for in the day that thou eatest thereof thou shalt surely die.
Genesis 3:2-3 And the woman said unto the serpent, We may eat of the fruit of the trees of the garden: But of the fruit of the tree which is in the midst of the garden, God hath said, Ye shall not eat of it, neither shall ye touch it, lest ye die.
They understood what they were supposed to do and what they were not supposed to do, so yes, they knew what disobedience was, they simply had not yet experienced it...
To understand obedience, is to understand disobedience.
So, 'i' agree with you on this. (I think?;))
And off topic. I finally got your garage & car down to size! We updated Windows Internet Explorer & that even spread out this 'message page' to the right size for posting. About an extra 1" width.
--Elijah
apple?
Lloyd, Stovebolts asked me to post some of my questions so he could address them, so I am. Why I ask them is simply because I personally believe that questions must be addressed. These OT accounts are suppose to point to the character of god, . . . and if questions arrise [for me], yet I ignore them, can I truly know for sure that what I'm seeking for IS what I could agree with?
I was listening to R C Sproul's daily show on the way to a conference today. I had to get out of the car at a critical part, but he was talking about the question of whether God created evil, and related it to Adam & Eve. His position on the matter was that Christians should start a response by being honest and saying, "I don't know. No on truly knows. But, it's not critical to know."
He was part way through pointing out one theological position when I had to get out of my car. This position was that if God created a perfectly, I mean perfectly, sinless being, He would have been creating in essence "another god". To be a being 100% void of any flaw would be to create something perfectly of His nature. This being would need to be subject to Him, but would share His very nature, which creates sort of a paradox.
I just found this interesting.
I find the comment from Sproul interesting. So, they really couldn't have been "made perfect" then. Therefore, on some level, they had to have been flawed. If "having free will" is that flaw, then it can be argued that "the fall" was preordained to happen, thus the necessary impliments were put in place to start the ball rolling, so to speak.
I find the comment from Sproul interesting. So, they really couldn't have been "made perfect" then. Therefore, on some level, they had to have been flawed. If "having free will" is that flaw, then it can be argued that "the fall" was preordained to happen, thus the necessary impliments were put in place to start the ball rolling, so to speak.