HIR,
You wrote in #46, '
If Adam and Eve were the first two humans....' You didn't write, '
Since Adam and Eve were the first two humans....'
'If' they were human beings puts doubts in my (the reader's) mind that you consider them to be the first humans.
I didn't explain the second half of the post well enough when I stated: '
"... does that mean that we still have their DNA?" This is an
Argument from Silence Fallacy that you have asked as a question'. The link explains more about this fallacy in reasoning.
Is that what you mean by your statement: 'I don't understand that kind of writing'.
Whenever I want to present a case for something that is not in the biblical text, I engage in erroneous reasoning. Since nothing is stated about DNA in the OT text, there is no way that we could ever know the truth or falsehood of such an investigation.
This type of fallacious reasoning is called an
Argument from Silence Fallacy.
It is not dealing with evidence or facts. It relates to the kind of reasoning used.
I apologise for not explaining it in a better way.
If you still don't understand what I wrote, would you please raise the issues with me for further explanation?
Oz