[__ Science __ ] Adam, Eve, and Evolution

[TonyChanYT]

From the scientific perspective in terms of space-time, God created the earth with evolutionary events, including dinosaurs, Neanderthals, etc. embedded in it.

Neanderthals belong to the species of Homo sapiens neanderthalensis. Today's humans belong to Homo sapiens sapiens. Both groups are humans (Homo sapiens). Both have 46 chromosomes though there is some uncertainty about that. Neanderthals existed only in space-time and not in witnessed-time, as such, they never received a breath of God in their spirits. They would not be judged to go to heaven or hell.

From the biblical point of view, God created Adam and Eve in real-time (or witnessed-time) history as described in Genesis. Genesis 3:

20 Adam named his wife Eve, because she would become the mother of all the living.

Acts 17:

26 From one man he made all the nations, that they should inhabit the whole earth; and he marked out their appointed times in history and the boundaries of their lands.

In terms of first-order logic, the two perspectives do not contradict: witnessed-time and space-time. They can both be real.

See also

• How old is the earth?
• Scientists woke up a 46,000-year-old roundworm from Siberian permafrost.

 

[Who Me]

From the scientific perspective in terms of space-time, God created the earth with evolutionary events, including dinosaurs, Neanderthals, etc. embedded in it.

or God created a world that suffered a global event that formed fossels, multiple layers of sedimentry rock and the results of world wide volcanic activity.

Ones theology has to include the ecomomy of God. He often uses his powers in a minimal way.

 

[TonyChanYT]

or God created a world that suffered a global event that formed fossels, multiple layers of sedimentry rock and the results of world wide volcanic activity.

Ones theology has to include the ecomomy of God. He often uses his powers in a minimal way.

Right. See Occam's razor.

 

[Barbarian]

Is this anything like Aardsma's "virtual history?"

 

[TonyChanYT]

Is this anything like Aardsma's "virtual history?"

Sorry, never heard of it.

 

[Barbarian]

Sorry, never heard of it.

Dr. Aardsma

Biographical information about the founder of The Biblical Chronologist, Dr. Gerald E. Aardsma.

www.biblicalchronologist.org

 

[Who Me]

Right. See Occam's razor.

And the simplist most reasonable answer is the young earth creation answer, as all other answers require God to interview, rather than the processes of science reacting.

 

[TonyChanYT]

And the simplist most reasonable answer is the young earth creation answer, as all other answers require God to interview, rather than the processes of science reacting.

Define reasonable. Is first-order logic reasonable?

 

[Who Me]

Define reasonable. Is first-order logic reasonable?

I am no logistian and have no idea what is meant by 1st order.
As far asI am concerned it is reasonable for God to work through processes he has set in motion and unreasonable to assume that God ma,especially fake historical events to falsely give an impression of age.

Do remember the original reason for long ages and evolution was to do away with the need for God.
That alone should cause Christians to question ideas that include millions of years etc etc.

 

[TonyChanYT]

to assume that God ma,especially fake historical events to falsely give an impression of age.

Did I assume that?

 

[Who Me]

Did I assume that?

Quote "God created the earth with the embedded evolutionary records of billions of years. The Bible is not a scientific treatise" unquote from how old is the earth.
You may not be.ieve it, but you give the impression that this is your view.