Jethro Bodine
Member
Not blind, legalistic Christian values as Farouk may be suggesting, but values developed through the process of learning the real truth about human nature as we grow up into Christ. I've been a learning, growing Christian for twenty-seven years and I've learned a lot about the truth of what makes man tick. It's not pretty. And it goes deep. This is what God wants each of us to know so we can long for the kingdom to come and escape from the ways of fallen humanity at work in us and the world. Those lessons come through time and experience.Okay I can see how that would be a turn off for men with strong traditional christian values.Now you know this goes waaaaay beyond just fitness.
IMO, much of this is motivated by pride and arrogance, and woman's angry resentment of man's God given role as head. Underneath it all it's really nothing more than rebellion against the what God established . That's the connection to Christianity.
No. But it seems some women believe it helps.Is headship determined through physical strength?
No, because that doesn't represent authority over a man. But I'm sure some women who seek to excel in typically male dominated areas are pleased with the perception they get that it somehow means breaking the bonds of male authoritative control. Body building being one of them. What we humans can't do in reality we often seek to do in perception. It's all just part of the games we humans--discontented and dissatisfied with the way things are--play.Would a woman having a tenure position at a university in some traditionally masculine field of science, let's say theoretical physics, be rebelling against men's headship, too (and hence be a bad woman for a christian man to marry, too?)... or any woman that does something we would typically think to be a "male" thing?
You are so wrong. The 'talent and beauty search' mentality that controls the world is predicated on the belief that strong and beautiful and talented people are valuable and sought after and treated with love and respect. It's all part of the way man loves. It's a consuming, selfish love that grasps and covets that which pleases us. We all know this by (fallen) nature. That's why we ALL play the game at striving to be lovely and talented and beautiful and strong and educated and charismatic so people will love us and treat us with favor.Just asking because I was wondering how body building is a sign of rebellion, what element of it makes it rebellious. Independence and strength can be obtained in other ways than physical muscular strength. In our society physical strength is actually rather irrelevant for a person's social status and independence.
I don't sense an ounce of attack in your question. So I guess you did a good job of avoiding the possibility of taking offense on my part.Also you seem to attribute the motivation for women to do body building to her perceived role in relation to men. Now my next question will probably sound like an attack disguised as a question, but it really isn't an attack. I've reworded it three times already, but it still sounds like an attack... oh well... Can you imagine women do things that are completely unrelated to men? Or is it, in your experience/ convicition, female nature that all we do has something to do with our relationship towards men? In other words, can you imagine that some women may do body building with no feminist/ rebellious motivation whatsoever?
But anyway...of course the possibility exists. Humans are an amazingly predictable, yet so unpredictable bunch. There's always an exception to what we are sure is the way it is about people. Part of growing up in Christ means always leaving room for people to not be in conformance to our preconceived expectations, but at the same time being educated in what the legitimate preconceived expectations are for fallen man.
Let's turn the tables here. What if we were talking about a man who made an excessive and radical point to appear feminine, breasts and all. Can we really just dismiss all elements of rebellion against God's design for male and female roles as the motivation for that in that case?
It's interesting how a man who doesn't act like a man is not okay, but it's okay, even respected, for a woman to act like a man. It goes back to this human value system that strong is good, weakness and vulnerability is not. For obvious reasons this is a bigger issue with women than it is for men. We men have a lot more in the strength department, by virtue of hormones, going for us right out of the gate. And I'm not just talking about physical strength.
Last edited by a moderator: