Christian Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Belief and Faith

A lot of your response got tied up in the quote.


How about this to simplify -


Can a person be saved without obeying the Gospel?



JLB
Yes, Sir.
And this is why...
God saves merely on His Promise TO save.

All God is doing in TIME (and on the planet) is preparing bodies to go with those names He contemplated in Trinity and wrote in the book of life of the lamb slain...BEFORE He created heaven, earth, and man.

It's a done deal. God is calling to Himself all those named people.

The Holy Spirit is in the world today and His Ministry is to apply the salvation bought by the Son.
 
Yes, Sir.
And this is why...
God saves merely on His Promise TO save.

All God is doing in TIME (and on the planet) is preparing bodies to go with those names He contemplated in Trinity and wrote in the book of life of the lamb slain...BEFORE He created heaven, earth, and man.

It's a done deal. God is calling to Himself all those named people.

The Holy Spirit is in the world today and His Ministry is to apply the salvation bought by the Son.


Thanks for sharing.


Here are the scriptures that pertain to obeying the Gospel.


since it is a righteous thing with God to repay with tribulation those who trouble you, and to give you who are troubled rest with us when the Lord Jesus is revealed from heaven with His mighty angels, in flaming fire taking vengeance on those who do not know God, and on those who do not obey the gospel of our Lord Jesus Christ. These shall be punished with everlasting destruction from the presence of the Lord and from the glory of His power, when He comes, in that Day, to be glorified in His saints and to be admired among all those who believe, because our testimony among you was believed. 2 Thessalonians 1:6-10



Since you have purified your souls in obeying the truth through the Spirit in sincere love of the brethren, love one another fervently with a pure heart, having been born again, not of corruptible seed but incorruptible, through the word of God which lives and abides forever, 1 Peter 1:22-23



But they have not all obeyed the gospel. For Isaiah says, “Lord, who has believed our report?” So then faith comes by hearing, and hearing by the word of God. Romans 10:16-17




I think we should discuss what it means to obey the Gospel, since it is clear from the scriptures that those who do not obey the Gospel will be punished with everlasting destruction.



  • on those who do not obey the gospel of our Lord Jesus Christ. These shall be punished with everlasting destruction



JLB
 
Thanks for sharing.

Here are the scriptures that pertain to obeying the Gospel.

since it is a righteous thing with God to repay with tribulation those who trouble you, and to give you who are troubled rest with us when the Lord Jesus is revealed from heaven with His mighty angels, in flaming fire taking vengeance on those who do not know God, and on those who do not obey the gospel of our Lord Jesus Christ. These shall be punished with everlasting destruction from the presence of the Lord and from the glory of His power, when He comes, in that Day, to be glorified in His saints and to be admired among all those who believe, because our testimony among you was believed. 2 Thessalonians 1:6-10

Since you have purified your souls in obeying the truth through the Spirit in sincere love of the brethren, love one another fervently with a pure heart, having been born again, not of corruptible seed but incorruptible, through the word of God which lives and abides forever, 1 Peter 1:22-23

But they have not all obeyed the gospel. For Isaiah says, “Lord, who has believed our report?” So then faith comes by hearing, and hearing by the word of God. Romans 10:16-17

I think we should discuss what it means to obey the Gospel, since it is clear from the scriptures that those who do not obey the Gospel will be punished with everlasting destruction.

on those who do not obey the gospel of our Lord Jesus Christ. These shall be punished with everlasting destruction
JLB
Excellent.
Here's your...
QUOTE: "I think we should discuss what it means to obey the Gospel, since it is clear from the scriptures that those who do not obey the Gospel will be punished with everlasting destruction."

If you want to start a new thread, begin by posting the Scripture that says the above and I'll respond.
Of course, you may comment yourself. What say ye?
 
Here are the scriptures that pertain to obeying the Gospel.

Here’s another:

You were running well. Who hindered you from obeying the truth? This persuasion is not from the one who calls you!
Galatians 5:7-8 - https://www.biblegateway.com/passage?search=Galatians 5:7-8&version=LEB

I think we should discuss what it means to obey the Gospel,
Me too. Maybe its own thread? Who knows, it might get sticky status.

I know of one example that obeying the Gospel Truth does NOT mean: To become circumcised, for example:

For in Christ Jesus neither circumcision counts for anything nor uncircumcision, but faith working through love.​
Galatians 5:6 - https://www.biblegateway.com/passage?search=Galatians 5:6&version=LEB

And I know of one example that obeying the Gospel Truth does mean: faith working through love.

Which, of course, leads to the question;
What does it mean (literally) for a brother to “work through love”??? Paul doesn’t leave the Galatians without answering this question (and led them by example too):
For you were called to freedom, brothers. Only do not let your freedom become an opportunity for the flesh, but through love serve one another.
Galatians 5:5,13 - https://www.biblegateway.com/passage?search=Galatians 5:5,13&version=LEB
 
Last edited:
Could you please share the scripture where it teaches this.
JLB
You know, JLB, honestly, I was going to reply "I don't have to. The mere fact that God created the heavens and the earth, created a sinful man, (even if you hold the man was holy), the intention of God is clearly found in that in every contact God has made with the man it was HE who initiated the contact, of every person in the Scripture that had a positive relationship with Him - whether it shows that He called the man (or woman) or that if the narrative begins with the person already in positive relationship, the M.O. of God is that every one of these people was called of God to begin with. From Adam to Noah, to Abraham, to Moses, to David, to Andrew, Peter, Paul, Jesus, and everyone in-between. God has been the One who offered or insisted, or downright pushed salvation on man, and the fact that man did not ask God for saving, or deliverance but God provides salvation in and through Covenant - first in Trinity, second, in Trinity - shows that salvation was God's idea and not man's, and yet man is to be beneficiary of God sacrificing His Right Arm so that those He contemplated in Trinity as saved individuals can and could come to pass in TIME, and the which when TIME is no more, then it's back into Trinity from whence we first were contemplated. But now we'll have bodies!"

And then I thought to myself....hmmmm, that sounds rude. You asked for a Scripture and I don't provide one but instead provide an examination of the first causes of salvation instead.

So, now that you know my spirit in which I choose not to sound rude (it's not rudeness, it's declaratory, straight-up and forthwith without deception without ambiguity, because that's how my Father would respond as well. And since my Father says what He means and means what He says, I, being conformed into the unbroken image of Christ (not Adam) who does the same as His Father, I am under instruction AND command to come at you in the same way - without shadow or turning.

So, let my first thought above be my response, please, and just to let you know, I am not being rude.
Is that Okie-Dokie with you?
Some like the smell of napalm in the morning. Me? I love the sound and experience of HEAT, IMPACT, FRICTION, SOUND, and WONDER when two swords clang!
:poke
 
Excellent.
Here's your...
QUOTE: "I think we should discuss what it means to obey the Gospel, since it is clear from the scriptures that those who do not obey the Gospel will be punished with everlasting destruction."

If you want to start a new thread, begin by posting the Scripture that says the above and I'll respond.
Of course, you may comment yourself. What say ye?
It's not necessary to start a new thread.
In the Greek it's understood that to believe is to obey.
If we do not obey, we do not believe.
 
You know, JLB, honestly, I was going to reply "I don't have to. The mere fact that God created the heavens and the earth, created a sinful man, (even if you hold the man was holy), the intention of God is clearly found in that in every contact God has made with the man it was HE who initiated the contact, of every person in the Scripture that had a positive relationship with Him - whether it shows that He called the man (or woman) or that if the narrative begins with the person already in positive relationship, the M.O. of God is that every one of these people was called of God to begin with. From Adam to Noah, to Abraham, to Moses, to David, to Andrew, Peter, Paul, Jesus, and everyone in-between. God has been the One who offered or insisted, or downright pushed salvation on man, and the fact that man did not ask God for saving, or deliverance but God provides salvation in and through Covenant - first in Trinity, second, in Trinity - shows that salvation was God's idea and not man's, and yet man is to be beneficiary of God sacrificing His Right Arm so that those He contemplated in Trinity as saved individuals can and could come to pass in TIME, and the which when TIME is no more, then it's back into Trinity from whence we first were contemplated. But now we'll have bodies!"

And then I thought to myself....hmmmm, that sounds rude. You asked for a Scripture and I don't provide one but instead provide an examination of the first causes of salvation instead.

So, now that you know my spirit in which I choose not to sound rude (it's not rudeness, it's declaratory, straight-up and forthwith without deception without ambiguity, because that's how my Father would respond as well. And since my Father says what He means and means what He says, I, being conformed into the unbroken image of Christ (not Adam) who does the same as His Father, I am under instruction AND command to come at you in the same way - without shadow or turning.

So, let my first thought above be my response, please, and just to let you know, I am not being rude.
Is that Okie-Dokie with you?
Some like the smell of napalm in the morning. Me? I love the sound and experience of HEAT, IMPACT, FRICTION, SOUND, and WONDER when two swords clang!
:poke
So God makes the first move and initiates the contact.
Good.
Does man get the free will choice to accept or reject Him?
 
This alone needs to be addressed. In your absence we've seen people base entire treatises on the meaning of one word from the Bible, in English, having no understanding that there isn't always a word-for-word translation. Sometimes a translation difficulty can be explained in a sentence, but some things require much more: perhaps learning about their culture, or geography, or their humor, knowing enough details to know why it was funny.
Other sections were written as poetry, which would also inform our interpretation ...
TTYTT R, and at my own peril, I think very few single words in the NT should be clinged to with dear life.

The NT should be read and considered as a complete thought. If this was done, debates about concepts such as eternal security would end immediately.

I dislike pulling verses out as proof texts, however it is necessary in a discussion.
 
I had thought of this same point or example this AM.




No, which is precisely why I posted the passage of the Pharisee versus the tax collector. Jesus accepted the tax collector’s “humbleness” in admitting himself to be a sinner. Which is completely opposite of claiming one’s innocence. And this is exactly why I don’t think my conversation has been trivial, silly or quibbling over a word’s meaning.


It takes something else, repentance!
Repentance is a turning from sin, Biblically speaking. If a child or an atheist thinks himself innocent, can they truly repent?
I don't think any of this discussion has been trivial. In fact, it has been quite interesting and so far we appreciate that it has remained as a friendly discussion.

To your reply above, so far what I'm understanding from your point of view is that it takes humility and repentance to get to heaven. What is it that we need to repent from? My understanding is our rebellion and with that said, isn't repentance the result of obedience? In other words, we need to repent because of our disobedience and therefore to repent means to obey. Obey not only the command to repent but in so doing we will turn to obedience.

So, does it seem correct then that to get to heaven requires humility, repentance, and obedience?
 
To your reply above, so far what I'm understanding from your point of view is that it takes humility and repentance to get to heaven.
So, does it seem correct then that to get to heaven requires humility, repentance, and obedience?
Short answer: yes for us.
Long answer: yes, but Matt 18:1-4 is about levels of greatness in Heaven, not so much listing 3 entrance criteria. Although it is true that everyone walking in darkness must first repent. (Did the risen Christ, who never walked in darkness, enter Heaven??? Did He repent???)

Before I answer your other questions;
“If a child or an atheist thinks himself innocent, can they truly repent?”


What is it that we need to repent from?
Sin, walking in darkness.

the people sitting in darkness saw a great Light. And for the ones sitting in the region and shadow of death, a Light rose for them” [Isa 9:1-2]. From that time on Jesus began to proclaim and say, “Repent, for the kingdom of the heavens has drawn-near”.​

Are children innocent and therefore not sitting in darkness?
isn't repentance the result of obedience?
No, it’s the other way around. Walking in the light, walking in the truth, is obedience. One must first turn from walking in darkness (i.e. repent) prior to obedience (i.e. walking in the Light).

And notice Jesus’s answer the their question:

and said, “Truly I say to you, unless you are turned- around and become like children, you will never enter into the kingdom of the heavens.
Matthew 18:3 - https://www.biblegateway.com/passage?search=Matthew 18:3&version=DLNT

First thing comes first, repent (turn) then you can walk the right way. I fail to see how someone who claims innocence can repent (turn-from their walking (or sitting) in darkness). As an unbeliever as a child, I truly thought I was innocent. Until I admitted my quilt (my walking in darkness), I couldn’t turn from it.

Obey not only the command to repent but in so doing we will turn to obedience.

⬆️ See, repentance (turn around from walking in darkness) comes prior to obedience (walking in the Light).
 
The Bible, in numerous Scriptures, tells us what kind of faith Jesus would like His disciples to have. And it’s not child-like, in the sense of claiming innocence (that’s my point). It’s actually the opposite sense. Admitting your guilt.
If we don't admit our guilt, how is there repentance?
I agree with you on the above.
I didn't mean child-like in innocence, I even said children are not innocent. I've always meant child-like in our faith. I believe this is different.


No He didn’t say that.
THIS child was humble (not innocent).
Innocent in behavior Chessman.
Innocent in our faith.
I can't repeat this continually.

You can think it includes all sorts of likenesses to children, but Jesus’s point was in the sense of this child’s humbleness (turning from considering yourself great as His disciples were doing at the time).
Agreed.


Okay, sorry. I understood you to mean “children are innocent”.
Children are innocent in many ways. Especially in how they trust their parents. BUT, they are not innocent in the meaning of being humble. Most kids are NOT humble.
Last chance understand.


I said: “Notice the humble needs healing (not innocent).” Prov 3 is consistent with my point about Jesus’s teaching in Matt 18. To be humble like the child Jesus referred to is to recognize your sinfulness (or as this Proverb puts it, your flesh needs healing).

Do not be wise in your own eyes; fear Yahweh and retreat from evil. There shall be healing for your flesh, and refreshment for your body.
Proverbs 3:7-8 - https://www.biblegateway.com/passage?search=Proverbs 3:7-8&version=LEB
Is the above YOUR quote or mine? If it's mine, I quoted the wrong Proverb I guess. It's
Proverbs 3:5-6
5Trust in the LORD with all your heart
And do not lean on your own understanding.

6In all your ways acknowledge Him,
And He will make your paths straight.


I mean by the above Proverb that we are to trust in the Lord as children trust in their parents. We need to lean on the understanding our parents have and not on the understanding the child has because parents know more, just as God knows more.


Actually, I’m the one that has posted it and commented on what it says in this thread.
The verse doesn’t say or even imply disciples are to have a child-like faith and it for sure doesn’t say children are innocent.

Children in 1st Century Jewish society considered themselves humble (which includes the sense of their sinfulness), not innocent.
Mathew 18:3 is used to preach on how we are to have a child-like faith. You may not agree with this. I don't plan on spending pages to convince you of this.

Here’s an on-topic question for you; If a child believes he/she is innocent, do you think they will believe they need forgiveness?
I don't know what this has to do with our conversation, but maybe you don't remember that I used to teach kids religion. This I know for sure: Kids don't think they've ever committed a sin until they've learned what a sin is. Some kids learn right away and some kids take months to understand. Kids believe they are innocent.

So your point is?
That if Jesus meant the child was innocent and we are to be like him then we won't think we need forgiveness? We're adults C, not children. It only refers to our faith NOT our innocence.
 
So God makes the first move and initiates the contact.
Good.
Does man get the free will choice to accept or reject Him?
Nope. Free will in man is an illusion. Paul says we are servants to sin and sin nature. Martin Luther calls it "The Bondage to Sin." If we are in bondage, then nothing in man is free. Not even will. God doesn't have free will. His will is dictated and restricted by His Deific Attributes and Hi Nature. God has only ONE will: Good.
Thank God.

Man hates God. And God calls the world filled with non-Covenant men His enemy.

1 John 2:15 (KJV)
15 Love not the world, neither the things that are in the world. If any man love the world, the love of the Father is not in him.

First, there is no redundancy. The "love not the world" are men - non-Covenant men. The "things in the world" are what comes next: :

1 John 2:16 (KJV)
16 For all that is in the world, the lust of the flesh, and the lust of the eyes, and the pride of life, is not of the Father, but is of the world.

God doesn't love the world. It would be hypocritical and sinful of God to command His people to "not love the world" and then He turns and love the world Himself. God is not a hypocrite.

Let's see your comprehension level. In the Old Testament the high priest of the Tabernacle does two things: he offers sacrifices for the people of God, and he prays for the people of God. What would happen if the high priest, who does this once a year on the Day of Atonement, did not pray for the people of God nor offer sacrifices for the people of God?
 
Nope. Free will in man is an illusion. Paul says we are servants to sin and sin nature. Martin Luther calls it "The Bondage to Sin." If we are in bondage, then nothing in man is free. Not even will. God doesn't have free will. His will is dictated and restricted by His Deific Attributes and Hi Nature. God has only ONE will: Good.
Thank God.

Man hates God. And God calls the world filled with non-Covenant men His enemy.

1 John 2:15 (KJV)
15 Love not the world, neither the things that are in the world. If any man love the world, the love of the Father is not in him.

First, there is no redundancy. The "love not the world" are men - non-Covenant men. The "things in the world" are what comes next: :

1 John 2:16 (KJV)
16 For all that is in the world, the lust of the flesh, and the lust of the eyes, and the pride of life, is not of the Father, but is of the world.

God doesn't love the world. It would be hypocritical and sinful of God to command His people to "not love the world" and then He turns and love the world Himself. God is not a hypocrite.

Let's see your comprehension level. In the Old Testament the high priest of the Tabernacle does two things: he offers sacrifices for the people of God, and he prays for the people of God. What would happen if the high priest, who does this once a year on the Day of Atonement, did not pray for the people of God nor offer sacrifices for the people of God?
Well J,
Here's my comprehension level.
You're calvinist in beliefs and do not say so.
Why is it that calvinist's are so hesitant to say that they are of this belief system?

John 3:16 tells me that we have free will to choose to believe in God's only begotten (unique) son.

Deuteronomy 30:19 tells me that I have a choice to choose life or to choose death.

Galatians 5:13 tells me that I am a free person.

John 7:17 tells me I can choose to do God's will.

Where in the entire bible does it say I DO NOT have free will?
WHEN was it taken away from me?
 
Last edited:
Well, if you're wondering.... :)
QUOTE: If I believe in someone, I also have faith in them.
Faith, as in trust.
If I have faith in someone, I also believe in them.
Believe in, as trust in.
1. Don't both the words faith and believe end up in trust?
Could you explain why they're different?
RESPONSE: My error. I should have been clearer. When I see these words I know the part of speech is in play. One is noun-feminine, the other is a verb. And this is important when studying the Scripture.

QUOTE: 2. What are cognates?
RESPONSE: A word is cognate with another if both derive from the same word in an ancestral language. In this case "peitho" is the root word and the other two derive from it.

QUOTE: 3. What does pistis, pistuo mean?
RESPONSE: Pistis and pistuo are two Koinonia Greek words that are in the KJV. First, "pistis….."

Greek Word: πίστις
Transliteration: pistis [G#4102]
Part of Speech: noun feminine
[note: the underlined words are the definition. Each Greek and Hebrew word in this reference book is numbered. (G=Greek, H=Hebrew).]

From the root (peitho) [G#3982];
"pistis" [G#4102] is defined as persuasion, i.e. credence; moral conviction (of religious truth, or the truthfulness of God or a religious teacher), especially reliance upon Christ for salvation; abstract constancy in such profession; by extensive the system of religious (Gospel) truth itself.

"Pistis" is found here:

Matthew 8:10 (KJV) When Jesus heard it, he marvelled, and said to them that followed, Verily I say unto you, I have not found so great faith [pistis], no, not in Israel.

Now, "pistuo"
Greek Word: πιστεύω
Transliteration: pisteuō
Part of Speech: verb

from [G#4102] (pistis); to have faith (in, upon, or with respect to, a person or thing), i.e. credit; by implication to entrust (especially one's spiritual well-being to Christ.)

"Pistuo" is found here:

Matthew 8:13 (KJV) And Jesus said unto the centurion, Go thy way; and as thou hast believed, so be it done unto thee. And his servant was healed in the selfsame hour.

QUOTE: 4. Do you agree that OBEY is in the word BELIEVE?
RESPONSE: You would have to do some grammarly-gymnastics to get there, but no.
Oops. I forgot to answer this.
Does the word believe include in it the word obey?
Yes it does.

You may want to read the following...

Believe and Obey



Chapter 26 John 3:16 Obeying Unto Christ Saves? (Part One)
Introduction
When the English translations of the Greek New Testament were made in the 1526-1611 period, the “difficult Greek in which the New Testament is written...still held mysteries for” English scholars. (Nicolson: 224.) One of those mysteries was the Greek word pisteuo in John 3:16. In over 200 instances of pisteuo in the New Testament, not once did the King James Bible render it as obey. (See Strong’s Concordance.) However, scholars now realize obey was a common meaning of pisteuo in ancient Greek. Obey certainly was the meaning of pisteuo in John 3:36 (See Part 2, JWOS: 448). Yet, this obedience-salvation formula is identically repeated in John 3:16.

Besides John 3:36 helping, one can more easily accept pisteuo means obeys in John 3:16 when one looks at Apostle John’s many quotes of Jesus about obedience. Jesus in John 8:51 says “whoever keeps on obeying (tereo) My Teaching should never ever die.”1 In John 15:1-10, Jesus says a “branch in me” that does not “bear fruit” is “taken away,” “cut off from the vine,” thrown “outside and burned.” 2

continued here: It's a VERY interesting and eye-opening article.

source: https://www.jesuswordsonly.com/books/161-chapter-26-1jwos.html

 
so...the osas, southern baptist stance...not Scriptural? keep in mind; I come from a place with more SBC churches than people. :) thanks.
CE, who are you talking to?
I know you believe in OSAS. I don't, but I still love you as a brother in Christ.

Need some verses?
LOL
 
  • Like
Reactions: JLB
i dont have a solid opinion on osas, actually. and the way things are going with the sbc...i dunno...there's other churches out there, let's put it that way...

I think there are bona fide, genuine Christians in all denominations....I'm re-reading David Wilkerson's material on the faithful remnant in the last days...eerily prophetic, considering much of it was written in the 70s.


just trying to make convo online, I guess. :)
 
Back
Top