francisdesales
Member
- Aug 10, 2006
- 7,793
- 4
jgredline said:Francis
I will work on a rebutle as soon as I get the chance...
Let me ask you a Question though....Who was the book of Romans written to?
I will give you a hint. It was not written to the jews or non believers...If you understand that this book was written to believers (Christians) it will then begin to make sense....
Apparently, every Christian community of the day had to deal with Judaizers. It makes sense, since the first 50 years are a transition period where many Christians were once Jews. The decisions made in Acts 15 regading circumcision were probably not very popular, and some, such as James, still preferred to continue dietary restrictions for himself - as Paul relates in Galatians. Thus, the Jewish Christians are undergoing a MAJOR paradigm shift. Their rituals and what made them Jewish are no longer important in God's eyes. Couple that with Rome being one of the largest diaspora community, and you can understand why Paul wrote to Christians who wondered about the role of Judaism in the New Covenant (consider reading Rom 9-11, for example. Or dietary restrictions in Rom 14 - Paul's audience definitely had a Jewish tint to it).
jgredline said:As far as the early Saints go, I stand by what I said...Take Abraham for example... Why was he called a righteous man? If you say because of his faith, you would be right....It is because of his faith in God that God imputed ''his'' righteousness to Abraham....With out God, there is no man who is righteous no not one....On this side of the cross, there is still no one that is righteous, no not one...Only through Christ are we made righteous...More on this tomorrow.....
On this side of the cross? Is that some sort of code word? I don't know what on earth you are talking about...
With our God, there is no man who is righteous WITHOUT GOD! However, you cannot continue to ignore that many people are indeed called righteous - because of God, not their own works. Why the "either/or"? It is not a case of "God does everything" or "man does everything". Man is given commandments for the purpose of obeying them - and God gives man the ability to obey them. Thus, we participate with God in "working out our salvation", something we cannot do alone - but something that God does NOT do without us.
And as to "imputed", are you saying that God cannot undo what Adam did??? Why is it that Adam's sin, which wounds man INTERNALLY - NOT just imputed - is not corrected by God? Are you saying that Adam's sin is more powerful, being internal, than God's cure, which is NOT internal, according to you??? Read Romans 5. JUST AS Adam's sin effected the entire human race, the second Adam's redemption effected the entire human race. God MAKES us righteous again...
Regards