Charismatic Bible Studies - 2 Peter 2:4-9

Not a chance :biggrin2 . It certainly not a hill to die on for me , whole earth or just land . But I do like to talk about it .
Thank you--breaking fellowship over opinions is the only thing I worried about. Many years ago, when I finally made a complete commitment to Christ, God seemed to require of me that I inform all of my friends my new commitment. I lost *every friend!*

Then as I began to walk in the Lord, I found many Christians were weak--many of them new Christians--I was not. They bolted from the faith the instant a girlfriend broke up with them, they had financial problems, or were too tempted by sin. I lost many of my Christian friends.

Among the stronger Christian friends, I discovered that all of us have pride problems. Some of these friends discarded our friendship over certain matters that really didn't warrant major problems--it was all pride.

I'm happily married to a Christian woman who has stood fast, even though she was raised up in paganism and in a divisive family atmosphere. We struggle in our little church with all of its problems, but we try to keep our hearts right towards those we seem to have problems with.

I can tell you're a good Christian, and someone I'd like to consider a true, though distant, friend? And yes, we can discuss any subject that you're interested in. I have opinions about everything! ;)

I'll start a new post to give you my thoughts on the matters you raised.
 
So what you are saying is all the earth/land that mattered in the scheme of things was flooded , all the earth that had been corrupted as God said . In your thinking were all humans , other than those on the ark , wiped out ?
I'm saying that when the record used the phrase "all the earth" it was actually talking about the territory round about Noah's civilization. A better description would be, in my view, "all the land."

Every piece of dry land, as far as the eye could see, was flooded, and everything that lived on the land died. This was not the earth as in a globe, but rather, all the land round about Noah's civilization.

I think of what God did with Noah was intended to show Man that God intended to save the earth--not destroy it. And so, He had Noah save up a representative sample of animals from his region to show future generations that God does not intend to destroy the earth due to human sin. Rather, He intends to repopulate it with righteous people.
There is so very much we do not know about the antediluvian world such as what was the percentage of oxygen in the air . It has been suggested it was much higher and that is one of the reasons for such longevity of humans and the reason the animals and insects grew so much larger , I am speaking of the same species we have with us today .
True, conditions had to be different for those living before the Flood because they lived such long ages. And even after the Flood people continued to live much longer than we do today.
Do you know what the land mass looked like before the flood ?
I'm not anti-science. It can certainly be wrong, making too many assumptions. But generally, it uses methodologies that can be very accurate. Dating rocks and studying geology can really look into the distant past, though it can indeed make uniformitarian assumptions, as if the geoogical processes evolve uniformly without catastrophe.

My understanding is that the eruption of nearby Mt. St. Helens left a landscape that might ordinarily tell geologists that trees ended up the way they did over many thousands of years. Instead, a single calamity caused an unusual evolution in a short period of time.

But studying the earth and dating rocks we can get a pretty good idea of atmospheric conditions in Old Earth. It's just something we have to look at. For example, unmolested ice at the poles can show trapped gases from eras gone by, as I understand it. Or, the decay of substnces in rocks can show how long it has taken to change from one element to its resulting element.
Do you know what the salinity of the waters were pre-flood ? Wow , a wide variation even today .
No, but it's common sense to know that when rain falls, it gathers into streams and wetlands, the land not having enough salt to make the waters brine. We have the opposite in the oceans. It's a good bet God made some fish freshwater fish, and other fish saltwater fish.

Did you know there are species of fish today that require a depth habitat. The overwhelming waters of a flood would destroy these many species of fish. And without the food chain, beginning with vegetation, I doubt that any fish could survive a global flood.
Have you ever tried to eradicate weeds from your garden , flower beds or yard ? Tough to do isn't it ?
Actually I've done it a number of times in my back yard. I've used throwaway carpet remnants to lay over stickers, dandelions, etc. After a couple of months everything is dead under the carpet. Some things can leave long roots and runners to catch the sun outside of the carpet and survive. But a universal flood--I don't really think so.
Could it be the plants that did not survive the flood God had already considered that at the time of creation ?
I'm not sure what you mean? If God considered that He might cause a Global Flood later, after creation, He would not have made plants, animals, insects, and birds as He did, knowing they would be destroyed.

But several places in the Bible God said that the earth is forever. It may be "made new," but the one we have is the one we'll always have, it seems. It will just become immune to abuses that threaten it.
Could it be the God had preplanned for the flood before the world was ever created so all the necessary components were already figured in ?
Yes, God could create a world underwater and preserve all creatures and plants if He wanted. But this would be more akin to Science Fiction. It's interesting, God can do anything, but would He do something so out of the norm (for God)? I don't really think so.

Thanks for raising the questions though. I do want to cover every base when I take a stand on anything. And I always want to remain flexible, and open to change, if the Lord wishes it and makes it known to me. Thanks brother!
 
I'm not sure what you mean? If God considered that He might cause a Global Flood later, after creation, He would not have made plants, animals, insects, and birds as He did, knowing they would be destroyed.
Could have all the things destroyed already served their purpose before the flood waters came ? There are many extinct plants , animals and birds .
From things observed within about 200 yards of my house I could show you a Lepidodendron fossil . It is about 7 feet long imbedded in sandstone rock . This extinct tree (@300 million years ago , they say ) lived in swampy areas and this area now is not swampy it is a mountain .
Lepidodendron.jpg
Yes, God could create a world underwater and preserve all creatures and plants if He wanted. But this would be more akin to Science Fiction. It's interesting, God can do anything, but would He do something so out of the norm (for God)? I don't really think so.
Normal for God ? Like stopping the sun in the sky so a battle could be won ? I have seen God do things that science or otherwise can not do .
 
Could have all the things destroyed already served their purpose before the flood waters came ? There are many extinct plants , animals and birds .
From things observed within about 200 yards of my house I could show you a Lepidodendron fossil . It is about 7 feet long imbedded in sandstone rock . This extinct tree (@300 million years ago , they say ) lived in swampy areas and this area now is not swampy it is a mountain .
View attachment 21362

Normal for God ? Like stopping the sun in the sky so a battle could be won ? I have seen God do things that science or otherwise can not do .
Yea, God has done some pretty spectacular things. Perhaps He does Science Fiction too? After all, many of us enjoy that genre! I know I do! ;) I will never say what God can and can't do--I only suggest what seems *likely* He'd do.

I can say this, that God may have twice given us gas in our car that should've run down or run out. I can't say I know why He chose those occasions, and not others. But they were noticeable activities we were engaged in--one an emergency situation. I've seen other possible miracles, and a boatload of positive "coincidences."

I know a lot of plants and animals have gone extinct. But as I said, a Global Flood would've made *all creatures and vegetation* outside of the ark dead and gone. So anticipating this I don't think God would've made them in the 1st place. He would have to do a 2nd act of Creation.
 
That's why I personally focus so much on *what the Scriptures explicitly say,*

So do I. :thm I was thinking this morning how ought it is finding people to discuss the word verse by verse these days. It's like it's a lost art or something. But it ends up being the difference between truth and heresy, and accuracy vs. lies.
Taking this closer to home, quite a few years ago Constance Cumby visited our city. She drew a large crowd for a moderately-sized church, and saw even one of our State Senators, Ellen Craswell, attend.

If you don't know, she sort of started this fascination with the New Age movement on behalf of the Church. She was around politicians and heard new words being used, and had to find out where these new words were coming from.

She traced it back to what she called the "New Age Movement," and discovered its roots were in Luciferianism, or the Occult. Anyway, I think the Senator should've taken notice. I know she was a Christian, but was leading a Christian charge in a very liberal state.

As Christians we all wanted to vote for her. But shockingly, the liberal candidate won, ending the brief time Christians enjoyed "one of their own" in the government.

I actually worked for the Christian publishing company that published her books for awhile. It's in this city.
Some Christians today believe that Christianity will win, politically, by force of prayer and faith, and by pure persistence, trying to get as many Christians into office as possible. But I think the book of Revelation was written to warn us that even though we can make strides in government and in society with our testimony, the end result in this age will be Antichrist.

I hold to this position as well.
 
These unclean spirits (demons) had “taken captive” the Gnostics to influence them to teach doctrines of demons, that ultimately led astray those who gave heed to their teachings to depart from the faith.

Now the Spirit expressly says that in latter times some will depart from the faith, giving heed to deceiving spirits and doctrines of demons, speaking lies in hypocrisy, having their own conscience seared with a hot iron. 1 Timothy 4:1-2


These doctrines of demons are taught through people who have departed from the doctrine of Christ because they do not love the truth.

And a servant of the Lord must not quarrel but be gentle to all, able to teach, patient, in humility correcting those who are in opposition, if God perhaps will grant them repentance, so that they may know the truth, and that they may come to their senses and escape the snare of the devil, having been taken captive by him to do his will.
2 Timothy 2:23-26

Agreed. :thm There's a whole passage in 2nd Thessalonians that teaches the same thing, and that because they love not the truth, the Lord will allow demonic signs and wonders to appear to confirm the lies. They don't have to believe the truth their hearts would rather believe something else instead.
 
  • Like
Reactions: JLB
Back
Top