In the very same passage of scripture "The Firstborn from the dead" (first to rise from the dead)
Jesus is the beginning of the resurrection of the dead and the first to rise from the dead.
No, he isn't. Lazarus rose before him, as did at least three people in the OT. Jesus was the first to rise in newness of life, having defeated death so as to never die again.
Jesus is the beginning of the creation and the first to be created. He is a being hence "born" from the Father.
No, that cannot be. John 1:1-3, 10, 1 Cor. 8:6, Phil. 2:5-8, Col. 1:16-17, and Heb. 1:10-12, among others, absolutely rule out the possibility that the Son came into existence.
Col 1:15 He is the image of the invisible God, the firstborn of all creation.
Col 1:16 For by him all things were created, in heaven and on earth, visible and invisible, whether thrones or dominions or rulers or authorities—all things were created through him and for him.
Col 1:17 And he is before all things, and in him all things hold together. (ESV)
Again,
if "all things were created" by the Son, "in heaven and on earth, visible and invisible, whether thrones or dominions or rulers or authorities,"
if "all things were created through him,"
then it is logically impossible that he came into being at some point in time.
"Firstborn" in verse 15 speaks of his preeminence over all creation, that is, of having the standing, privileges, and rights as a son who is the firstborn (see the OT). That is the whole point of verses 16-17--to show
why he is preeminent.
The writer of Hebrews used Firstborn twice in regard to about the "Son"
Sure, but it has different meanings and the context determines which meaning, including the context of the entirety of Scripture. You cannot simply ignore the clear context of Heb. 1:10-12, in which the Father speaks of the Son as being Yahweh, nor the other uses in Scripture which have nothing to do with being born.
when God brings the Firstborn into the world He commands all His angels to bow to Him. -Why the need?
Because the whole point of Heb. 1 is to show the superiority of the Son to the angels, part of which is that the Son is Yahweh.
And the church of the firstborn. That's very specific language to call the church. Not the church of God or the church of Christ or the church of the Son.
This isn't a reference to the Son. Jesus is in the next verse (Heb. 12:24):
Heb 12:22 But you have come to Mount Zion and to the city of the living God, the heavenly Jerusalem, and
to innumerable angels in festal gathering,
Heb 12:23 and
to the assembly of the firstborn who are enrolled in heaven, and
to God, the judge of all, and
to the spirits of the righteous made perfect,
Heb 12:24 and
to Jesus, the mediator of a new covenant, and to the sprinkled blood that speaks a better word than the blood of Abel. (ESV)
These all refer to different things, different persons and groups of persons and beings.