Yes, it is.Gluttony is a sin.
Eating a Twinkie is not a sin.
Join For His Glory for a discussion on how
https://christianforums.net/threads/a-vessel-of-honor.110278/
https://christianforums.net/threads/psalm-70-1-save-me-o-god-lord-help-me-now.108509/
Read through the following study by Tenchi for more on this topic
https://christianforums.net/threads/without-the-holy-spirit-we-can-do-nothing.109419/
Join Sola Scriptura for a discussion on the subject
https://christianforums.net/threads/anointed-preaching-teaching.109331/#post-1912042
Strengthening families through biblical principles.
Focus on the Family addresses the use of biblical principles in parenting and marriage to strengthen the family.
Read daily articles from Focus on the Family in the Marriage and Parenting Resources forum.
Yes, it is.Gluttony is a sin.
You are confusing real hunger with sugar craving. Those are not the same. Also, in Matt 21:18-19 and the parallel passages in Luke and Mark, fig tree is a symbol of Israel, Jesus was not hungry for figs, he was checking if Israel was bearing any spiritual fruit, and he found none.I hope you are not accusing Jesus of worshipping idols when He saw the fig tree when "He hungered". (Matt 21:18-19)
Is 1 Corinthians in the OT? Or the NT? Even if it were in the OT, Jesus came not to abolish it, but to fulfill it.If you are trying to make me revert to OT customs, forget it.
I will keep thanking God for, and praying for the blessing promised by God, over my foods.
As soon as you eat one, you immediately crave for the next, guaranteed. You never stops at "a Twinkie". Twinkies are formulated and cooked in this way. That's the craving I'm talking about.Yes, it is.
Eating a Twinkie is not a sin.
And that's why it's bad. Abundant "simple sugar" don't exist in nature, even the sweet juice in sugarcane comes hand in hand with woody fiber. It's not "simple", it's oversimplification.No, it’s “simple,” as in not complex—which is neither starch nor fiber.
Look I basically agree with you.And that's why it's bad. Abundant "simple sugar" don't exist in nature, even the sweet juice in sugarcane comes hand in hand with woody fiber. It's not "simple", it's oversimplification.
Why? Did God make them bad for us?And that's why it's bad.
Fruit, vegetables, honey, and milk all contain sugars. All simple sugars, whether natural or processed, are treated the same way and one isn't worse than other. Yes, fruit also has fiber and other nutrients which make them healthier than having only processed sugars, but that's not the point. Too much fruit isn't all that good because of the amount of sugar. For example, two large apples contain as much sugar as a can of soda.Abundant "simple sugar" don't exist in nature, even the sweet juice in sugarcane comes hand in hand with woody fiber.
Not on my part.It's not "simple", it's oversimplification.
Tea and coffee made from plants contain diuretics . caffeine naturallyWhy? Did God make them bad for us?
Fruit, vegetables, honey, and milk all contain sugars. All simple sugars, whether natural or processed, are treated the same way and one isn't worse than other. Yes, fruit also has fiber and other nutrients which make them healthier than having only processed sugars, but that's not the point. Too much fruit isn't all that good because of the amount of sugar. For example, two large apples contain as much sugar as a can of soda.
Not on my part.
Yes. An 8 oz. glass of orange juice contains about 22g of sugar and 0g of fiber.Tea and coffee made from plants contain diuretics . caffeine naturally
Oranges have sugar and also citric acid naturally.and diabetics use bananas for sugar as needed because the body can process it that fast.
I thank God for supplying me with food when I am hungry.You are confusing real hunger with sugar craving. Those are not the same.
I feel you are over-spiritualizing it.Also, in Matt 21:18-19 and the parallel passages in Luke and Mark, fig tree is a symbol of Israel, Jesus was not hungry for figs, he was checking if Israel was bearing any spiritual fruit, and he found none.
NT; and thank God the OT has been fulfilled.Is 1 Corinthians in the OT? Or the NT? Even if it were in the OT, Jesus came not to abolish it, but to fulfill it.
Perhaps your reaction to sugar is different than mine.As soon as you eat one, you immediately crave for the next, guaranteed. You never stops at "a Twinkie". Twinkies are formulated and cooked in this way. That's the craving I'm talking about.
That IS the point. This is the “a calorie is a calorie” reductionist thinking, as though human body made in God’s image was just a machine and all kinds of food can be reduced to simple numbers. Even if that was the case, the labeled calorie amount in processed foods and our calorie intake from them are usually underestimated. And again, the fiber in those two apples makes a big difference, it’s not the same as a can of soda. High fructose syrup does NOT exist in nature.Fruit, vegetables, honey, and milk all contain sugars. All simple sugars, whether natural or processed, are treated the same way and one isn't worse than other. Yes, fruit also has fiber and other nutrients which make them healthier than having only processed sugars, but that's not the point. Too much fruit isn't all that good because of the amount of sugar. For example, two large apples contain as much sugar as a can of soda.
No, that's the symbol of Israel, directly linked to the parable of fig tree in the Olivet Discourse.I feel you are over-spiritualizing it.
Sometimes a tree is just a tree.
"For assuredly, I say to you, till heaven and earth pass away, one jot or one tittle will by no means pass from the law till all is fulfilled." - Matt. 5:18. Last time I checked, neither heaven nor earth has passed away.NT; and thank God the OT has been fulfilled.
That's not abundantly, that's gluttony. Overindulgence. "Man shall not live by bread alone, but every word proceeds from the mouth of God." Matt. 4:4, quoting Deut. 8:3.John wrote, in John 10:10..."... I am come that they might have life, and that they might have it more abundantly."
Cookies and Twinkies and pie, etc., are my "abundantly".
But....moderation in all things.
God didn't, man did. You mentioned apple, so take apple for instance, first we've got wild apple trees that only grew in certain terrain and certain climate, and only bore small, tangy fruit in certain season; then we've got domesticated apple trees in orchards with desirable traits, we can have fresh and tasty apple available all year around; then apple is processed into apple sauce and apple juice, packed in bottles and boxes; then candies with artificially extracted apple flavor. Now we even have apple that doesn't turn brown when cut and exposed to oxygen. We're drifting further and further away from God's creation.Why? Did God make them bad for us?
You still don't seem to be understanding what I'm saying. What I am saying has nothing to do with "a calorie is a calorie." It has everything to do with how the body body processes simple carbs, whether natural or processed; it uses them the same. HFCS isn't any worse than fructose, as previous thinking went. It only ends up being bad because of the quantities used and it's easier to consume more than it is to eat a ton of fruit.That IS the point. This is the “a calorie is a calorie” reductionist thinking,
This has nothing to do with my point.as though human body made in God’s image was just a machine and all kinds of food can be reduced to simple numbers. Even if that was the case, the labeled calorie amount in processed foods and our calorie intake from them are usually underestimated.
It might slow the absorption of the sugar, but in the end, it is still the same amount of sugar. And having too much of it will have the same result as having too much soda.And again, the fiber in those two apples makes a big difference, it’s not the same as a can of soda.
I know, and that's not the issue, which is, that the body treats the sugar in it the same way it treats fructose.High fructose syrup does NOT exist in nature.
God didn't make apples and all the other fruit with fructose? God didn't make bees to make honey?God didn't, man did. You mentioned apple, so take apple for instance, first we've got wild apple trees that only grew in certain terrain and certain climate, and only bore small, tangy fruit in certain season; then we've got domesticated apple trees in orchards with desirable traits, we can have fresh and tasty apple available all year around; then apple is processed into apple sauce and apple juice, packed in bottles and boxes; then candies with artificially extracted apple flavor. Now we even have apple that doesn't turn brown when cut and exposed to oxygen. We're drifting further and further away from God's creation.
Sometimes a tree is just a tree.No, that's the symbol of Israel, directly linked to the parable of fig tree in the Olivet Discourse.
Do you suppose circumcision is still relevant ?"For assuredly, I say to you, till heaven and earth pass away, one jot or one tittle will by no means pass from the law till all is fulfilled." - Matt. 5:18. Last time I checked, neither heaven nor earth has passed away.
If having a slice of pie is gluttony to you, don't have a slice of pie.That's not abundantly, that's gluttony. Overindulgence. "Man shall not live by bread alone, but every word proceeds from the mouth of God." Matt. 4:4, quoting Deut. 8:3.
God didn't make apples or any other fruit with HFCS, aspartame or any other artificial sweetener. And last time I checked, there's no raw honey in soda, only these artificial sweeteners.God didn't make apples and all the other fruit with fructose? God didn't make bees to make honey?
No it doesn't, fructose goes into the liver and causes damage. Don't take my own word for it, do your own research.I know, and that's not the issue, which is, that the body treats the sugar in it the same way it treats fructose.
No it's not. The sweenter in soda exceedingly surpasses the sugar in fruits. You feel full after eating a few fruits, you never feel full drinking soda.It might slow the absorption of the sugar, but in the end, it is still the same amount of sugar. And having too much of it will have the same result as having too much soda.
This is absolutely false. As I said, nobody eats "a ton of fruit", you'll feel full after you eat a few; but you can quickly down a large bottle of soda with the amoung of sugar equivalent to "a ton of fruit". Also, soda is widely available, especially in low income areas known as "food desert", it's easier to get soda than fresh water, whereas fresh fruit and vegetable are nowhere to be found.You still don't seem to be understanding what I'm saying. What I am saying has nothing to do with "a calorie is a calorie." It has everything to do with how the body body processes simple carbs, whether natural or processed; it uses them the same. HFCS isn't any worse than fructose, as previous thinking went. It only ends up being bad because of the quantities used and it's easier to consume more than it is to eat a ton of fruit.
Sometimes it's not.Sometimes a tree is just a tree.
"Fulfillment" doesn mean "done away with" or "abolished" as you think it does, but perfect demonstration; and "torah" primarily means teaching or instruction in Hebrew, not law. Also, Gen. 2:7 and 9:3 are NOT Mosaic law, it's God's design for all mankind.Do you suppose circumcision is still relevant ?
How about feast keeping ?
They are no longer necessary for salvation, so where is your cut-off line for "fulfilled" ?
I don't believe you'd only have one and be content. Also, I never mentioned pie, I myself bake apple pie and pumpkin pie; I was talking about junk food such as Twinkie, which most people neither eat as meal or dessert, but snack.If having a slice of pie is gluttony to you, don't have a slice of pie.
Dessert is not gluttony to me, thanks be to God.