It says they had the KNOWLEDGE. It doesn't say they were saved then lost it.
They simply made a profession of the truth but never possessing the new life of Christ....later rejecting the truth.
They had the KNOWLEDGE of what exactly?
What does KNOWLEDGE mean anyway?
Back in Genesis God told Adam not to eat of the tree of the KNOWLEDGE of good and evil.
So knowledge must mean knowing something and the effect it causes. Genesis 2:17
Adam knew only good. Then he ate of the fruit, now he KNEW evil too. He gained the KNOWLEDGE of good AND evil. And evil became real.
If one has the knowledge of the gospel and ESCAPED THE DEFILEMENT OF THE WORLD by the KNOWLEDGE of the Lord and Savior Jesus Christ and then are AGAIN entangled in them -
I'd say the person was had the knowledge of the gospel, escaped the defilement of the world, and then became lost again when they went back into the world. This might be called backsliding today.
2 Peter 2:21
If would have been better for them not to have known the way of righteousness. Who is righteous? The unsaved?
Interesting that Peter wrote this letter to warn of the danger of false teachers. And what was the false teaching?:
LAWLESSNESS that came from false teachings. Antinomianism - the HERESY that states that a Christian does not have to be moral. Today we call this hyper grace.
By the very writings in Peter we see that LAWFULNESS is necessary to be a Christian and one must also be moral.
Why do some have such a problem with this?
They'll say that they do not mean that one can sin - so then why debate this matter so much?
To my understanding, one debates this and believes in eternal salvation so as not to feel guilt because of a deep rooted desire to NOT adhere to the commandments which God set forth.
I can see no other reason.
Wondering