Christian Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

End of the Church Age? From corporate to individualism

Imagican said:
IF a 'group' of believers believes in FALSE DOCTRINE, then they are NOT members of the Body of Christ. It's really that simple. And ANYONE that KNOWS God and His Son KNOWS this without ANY doubt in their hearts or minds.

So, Free, which GROUP do you follow that follows in TRUTH?

Blessings,

MEC

MEC,

Do you mean a group of believers within a larger assembly or the entire assembly? Whichever way you look at it the two apostolic Churches founded by Paul at Corinth and in Galatia would have to be classed as not being true Churches by the above definition. But they were true Churches BECAUSE Paul was a true apostle who founded them! Paul's ministry was accompanied with signs and wonders. Again, if you are referring to modern Churches you first have to prove or disprove that they are apostolic.

blessings
 
2 Corinthians 5:6-10
Therefore, being always of good courage, and knowing that while we are at home in the body we are absent from the Lord-- for we walk by faith, not by sight-- we are of good courage, I say, and prefer rather to be absent from the body and to be at home with the Lord.

Therefore we also have as our ambition, whether at home or absent, to be pleasing to Him. For we must all appear before the judgment seat of Christ, so that each one may be recompensed for his deeds in the body, according to what he has done, whether good or bad.

If I have correctly read the sentiments of those who are separted from the body of Christ (though they would deny this) and have chosen to be with the Lord the text quoted above may clarify the matter. Is the decision to leave the assembly of the saints better for the individual OR does he choose to deny himself and stay for the sake of the corporate assembled sainst? The key is to be pleasing to the Lord.

blessings
 
Cornelius said:
If you believed the Bible is the Word of God, you would not have a problem with it being the highest authority. But you do not believe its the highest authority now do you ?

C

Quite literally, Jesus Christ is the WORD of God.

But let's move on.

The problem with the "Bible is the Word of God" argument is that it ABSOLUTELY relies on external witness. Any other attempt is just silliness. Numerology, voices in your head, circular arguments. Whatever. Without the Church, you wouldn't even know when the Word of God started and where it ended... Without the Church, who is to say that God doesn't CONTINUE to speak, like the Muslims, JV's and Mormons??? There is no internal evidence that suggests what belongs and what doesn't. ONLY THE CHURCH tells us that the written Word of God starts with Genesis and ends with the book of Revelation. NOWHERE DOES THE BIBLE ITSELF STATE THIS!!!

And to say "God preserves His Word" is to ignore that God would ALSO preserve His Church, the very institution that quite literally vouches for His Word. You can't have one without the other.

Isn't it quite ironic that God actually SAID He would preserve His Church, but nowhere does God say that that He would preserve His written words??? Again, you argue against what Scriptures say, and you tell us here that only YOU can determine "correct" interpretations???
 
Imagican said:
IF a 'group' of believers believes in FALSE DOCTRINE, then they are NOT members of the Body of Christ. It's really that simple.

I will not comment, but only smile at your words...

;)

In all seriousness, however, I am not so certain we can make that assumption... I will agree there is only one Church, but who is to say HOW we are all attached to it and who is a "member"? Perhaps more Protestants should read Catholic thinking on this idea...
 
francisdesales wrote:

In all seriousness, however, I am not so certain we can make that assumption... I will agree there is only one Church, but who is to say HOW we are all attached to it and who is a "member"? Perhaps more Protestants should read Catholic thinking on this idea...[/quote]

So francis,

I've been looking at 1 Cor 12 and the exposition on being a member of the body of Christ and members of one another in the assembly of the saints - the Church. Paul's discussion presupposes a 'physical presence' on earth at their gathering. Since Protestants are phycially separated from Catholics I would think that they do not consider themselves to be part of the same body. Are you hinting at the expression 'separated brethren' ?

blessings
 
4gewfw9.gif


Here is an individual that's individualistic that fully demonstrates that
we are in the last days. :yes

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=macIFwHROaM

I find this disturbing, it just makes me want to shake my head. :naughty
 
stranger said:
So francis,

I've been looking at 1 Cor 12 and the exposition on being a member of the body of Christ and members of one another in the assembly of the saints - the Church. Paul's discussion presupposes a 'physical presence' on earth at their gathering. Since Protestants are phycially separated from Catholics I would think that they do not consider themselves to be part of the same body. Are you hinting at the expression 'separated brethren' ?

blessings

We are indeed "separate" because we do not congregate together, but we do belong to the same Church, the same Body. We share much of the same faith and one does enter into the Church through Baptism. By baptism, we are buried into the death of Jesus Christ (Romans 6:2-3). Thus, even in the 200's, Catholics officially recognized that "heretics" who were validly baptized were part of the Church, in some mysterious and separated manner. Thus, "who is in the Church" becomes the question, since there is only one Church instituted by Christ.

This from the Dogmatic Constitution on the Church from Vatican 2...

15. The Church recognizes that in many ways she is linked with those who, being baptized, are honored with the name of Christian, though they do not profess the faith in its entirety or do not preserve unity of communion with the successor of Peter. For there are many who honor Sacred Scripture, taking it as a norm of belief and a pattern of life, and who show a sincere zeal. They lovingly believe in God the Father Almighty and in Christ, the Son of God and Saviour. They are consecrated by baptism, in which they are united with Christ. They also recognize and accept other sacraments within their own Churches or ecclesiastical communities. Many of them rejoice in the episcopate, celebrate the Holy Eucharist and cultivate devotion toward the Virgin Mother of God. They also share with us in prayer and other spiritual benefits. Likewise we can say that in some real way they are joined with us in the Holy Spirit, for to them too He gives His gifts and graces whereby He is operative among them with His sanctifying power. Some indeed He has strengthened to the extent of the shedding of their blood. In all of Christ's disciples the Spirit arouses the desire to be peacefully united, in the manner determined by Christ, as one flock under one shepherd, and He prompts them to pursue this end. Mother Church never ceases to pray, hope and work that this may come about. She exhorts her children to purification and renewal so that the sign of Christ may shine more brightly over the face of the earth.

Since Vatican 2, there have been a number of documents that have further explained these words and their meaning...

I know this can easily change the direction of this thread. I do not desire to make this a "Catholic" thread. However, the mindset behind it is useful for any follower of Jesus Christ: we should be wary of excluding men from the Kingdom, since the Spirit blows where He wills. The Catholic Church realizes it, and I think other Christian communities can learn from that example.

Regards
 
This insane claim that the bible must SAY "Im Gods Word' in order for it to BE trusted AS Gods word has prompted me to start a study on the matter.
RAther than bickering with catholics who cannot seem to get the idea that WE have FAITH that God did with the NEW testament what He did with the OLD, which was preserve His word thru disobedient men, I believe I'll post what Ive tossed together so far today and update it as it comes along.

UNDER CONSTRUCTION

The Authority of Gods word, the Bible
Wm Tipton

Assertions/Conclusions of this Article
To show that the scriptures as a whole ARE Gods words...His law, His precepts, His instruction to His people and that the final authority in matter of instructions is His word.

Also see this article for more proof about the bible being Gods word:
>> The Law of Moses IS the Law of God.

Supporting Evidence
Firstly we will establish that God HAS given His instruction and HIs precepts to man and it has been recorded for us in the writings we see in the bible.
Here is one such evidence where we can see very clearly that the law of Moses as we see it in writing in our bibles IS the 'word' of God;
[quote:18migawd]And keep the charge of the LORD thy God, to walk in his ways, to keep his statutes, and his commandments, and his judgments, and his testimonies, as it is written in the law of Moses, that thou mayest prosper in all that thou doest, and whithersoever thou turnest thyself:
(1Ki 2:3 KJV)
HIS ways, HIS commandments, HIS testimonies AS IT IS WRITTEN in the Law of Moses.
Gods law very much witnesses for itself that it IS His law.
We see VERY clear evidence in the above passage that cannot be denied except by the blind, the illiterate and those with agendas, that what is in the law of Moses IS the very words of the Lord our GOD. There is no escaping this fact for those who are honest.

Paul also says to Timothy:
And that from a child thou hast known the holy scriptures, which are able to make thee wise unto salvation through faith which is in Christ Jesus. All scripture is given by inspiration of God, and is profitable for doctrine, for reproof, for correction, for instruction in righteousness: That the man of God may be perfect, throughly furnished unto all good works.
(2Ti 3:15-17 KJV)
This most definitely applies DIRECTLY to the OLD testament as the New Testament had not yet been finished or canonized.
Notice Pauls use of 'ALL scripture is given by inspiration of God"....thus the conclusion is, assuming that Paul knew what the Hebrew scriptures were comprised of, that the entire old testament collection of 'scripture' WAS INSPIRED by God, thus WAS GODS WORD as a collective whole.

And this is where we have to actually TRUST that GOD DID actively guide me to preserve what HE wanted preserved, otherwise individual books may not be inspired and thus Pauls words to Timothy are fairly useless/meaningless as we couldnt even begin to know what actually belonged and what didnt with any certainty.
Not EVERY Old Testament book says that God is speaking directly, but we dont just assume that Paul was LYING when he said that ALL scripture in the Old testament is 'God breathed'. No, we ASSUME that Paul wasnt a liar and even those books that DONT say God is speaking directly ARE STILL His inspired word, thus ARE 'Gods word'.

2.0
The question then is are the letters and historical accounts of the New Testament 'Gods Word' or the words of men ?
Lets look at the New Testament and see what we find...

Paul shows here in no uncertain terms that what he is writing ARE the commandments of the Lord.
What? came the word of God out from you? or came it unto you only? If any man think himself to be a prophet, or spiritual, let him acknowledge that the things that I write unto you are the commandments of the Lord.
(1Co 14:36-37 KJV)
Paul surely presents that what he has written here to the Corinthians IS the commandments of God, thus what he writes IS the 'word' of God, otherwise Paul is a liar.
Paul is also VERY clear to be sure to alert the reader to when HE is speaking his own mind. Notice here that Paul makes plain distinction between the instruction of the Lord and when he is speaking his own thoughts in the matter;
Now to those who have married I command, yet not I, but the Lord: A wife is not to be separated from her husband-- and even if she does separate, let her remain unmarried or be reconciled to her husband--and a husband is not to divorce his wife.
But to the rest I, not the Lord, say: If any brother has an unbelieving wife, and she consents to live with him, let him not divorce her.
(1Co 7:10-12 EMTV)
Paul has no need to deceive. When he is not speaking the Lords instruction he apparently isnt afraid to state the fact. So there is no reason to believe on Pauls end that when he speaks words of instruction and guidance, and even just for encouragement, that he IS speaking by inspiration of the Lord unless Paul says otherwise.


3.0
What is the TRUE churches position where Gods word is concerned ?
The church does not DICTATE that the scriptures are Gods word, no she only CONFIRMS and AGREES in the matter by the witness of the Spirit of truth who indwells the church body, through the internal evidences within the scriptures themselves and by the many witnesses throughout history whom also evidence that the bible is Gods word to His people. By 'internal evidences' is meant any EVIDENCE that shows inspiration, not some unreasonable demand that the text state 'this is Gods word' which isnt the only type of evidence for inspiration that exists, yet those with agendas might demand.
Gods does not exist BECAUSE of the church, the church exists BECAUSE of God. Nor does His word exist BECAUSE the church, but the church exists BECAUSE of Him.
Men come and men go. Church doctrines change with the winds. One day a man is called a heretic, the next he is a 'separated brother'.
We cannot trust the passing whims of man. The only tangible thing we can trust for doctrine is Gods word which does not change with each new decade and every new church leader (popes, pastors, etc) and their wavering views.
The church does not decided what is and isnt Gods word, Gods word IS His word regardless. Each word that He has inspired IS His word whether the church accepts those words or not. The church can only decide to believe that the words ARE or arent His. She cannot change the fact that they are.
We either have faith in GOD that He has preserved His word, or we do not.
GOD is the source of our even believing in Him, thus HE is the source that convinced men of inspiration when canon was being brought together, and so we have FAITH in HIM that the bible is HIS word. Not because some man told us to believe, but because His Spirit witnesses with our Spirit and because His word HAS endured for a testimony to His church that He has preserved it.

The Bible teaches that the Spirit will guide us into all truth.
However, when He, the Spirit of truth, has come, He will guide you into all truth; for He will not speak on His own authority, but whatever He hears He will speak; and He will announce to you things to come.
(Joh 16:13 EMTV)
It also teaches us that men would arise from our very ranks, wolves who teach heresies from among ourselves, not sparing the flock...
Act 20:29 For I know this, that savage wolves will come in after my departure, not sparing the flock.
Act 20:30 Also from among you yourselves will arise men speaking things having been distorted, in order to draw away the disciples after them.
So we cannot even trust those among us with any absolute certainty, regardless of their claims. Ultimately we can only really trust the word of God that has been protected and preserved by Him, just as He did with the Old Covenant scriptures, we trust that he has done with the new, the internal and historical lending evidence that our faith in Him is very much justified.

What this comes down to is faith, not what we hear from men.
If we CANNOT trust God then we are in the wrong religion.
If we CAN trust God, then we CAN trust Him that He has not let His true assembly be deprived of the instruction He gave for her in the beginning of this age by letters and historical accounts and even prophecy as represented in our bibles.

If God did not preserve His word and the church has been left without instruction, then that means God has failed.
Since God did not fail then we can be assured that the writings by Paul and others that HE WANTED preserved for His people have BEEN preserved for them.
We trust GOD, not man, that His word HAS been kept for us even though some have tried to destroy it and others have tried to shroud it in ancient tongues to keep us from knowing it.
Gods word has prevailed because GOD has protected it, just as He has protected His church.

[/quote:18migawd]
 
Quite literally, Jesus Christ is the WORD of God.
And yet...
So then faith cometh by hearing, and hearing by the word of God.
(Rom 10:17 KJV)

What? came the word of God out from you? or came it unto you only? If any man think himself to be a prophet, or spiritual, let him acknowledge that the things that I write unto you are the commandments of the Lord.
(1Co 14:36-37 KJV)

Act 4:31 And when they had prayed, the place was shaken where they were assembled together; and they were all filled with the Holy Ghost, and they spake the word of God with boldness.

Act 13:46 Then Paul and Barnabas waxed bold, and said, It was necessary that the word of God should first have been spoken to you: but seeing ye put it from you, and judge yourselves unworthy of everlasting life, lo, we turn to the Gentiles.

Act 18:11 And he continued there a year and six months, teaching the word of God among them.

Act 17:13 But when the Jews of Thessalonica had knowledge that the word of God was preached of Paul at Berea, they came thither also, and stirred up the people.

Act 6:2 Then the twelve called the multitude of the disciples unto them, and said, It is not reason that we should leave the word of God, and serve tables.

Act 13:44 And the next sabbath day came almost the whole city together to hear the word of God.

Luk 4:4 And Jesus answered him, saying, It is written, That man shall not live by bread alone, but by every word of God.

Act 13:7 Which was with the deputy of the country, Sergius Paulus, a prudent man; who called for Barnabas and Saul, and desired to hear the word of God.

But he said, Yea rather, blessed are they that hear the word of God, and keep it.
(Luk 11:28 KJV)

Joh 10:35 If he called them gods, unto whom the word of God came, and the scripture cannot be broken;
Clearly the 'word' of God is what GOD has spoken...


.
 
stranger said:
Imagican said:
IF a 'group' of believers believes in FALSE DOCTRINE, then they are NOT members of the Body of Christ. It's really that simple. And ANYONE that KNOWS God and His Son KNOWS this without ANY doubt in their hearts or minds.

So, Free, which GROUP do you follow that follows in TRUTH?

Blessings,

MEC

MEC,

Do you mean a group of believers within a larger assembly or the entire assembly? Whichever way you look at it the two apostolic Churches founded by Paul at Corinth and in Galatia would have to be classed as not being true Churches by the above definition. But they were true Churches BECAUSE Paul was a true apostle who founded them! Paul's ministry was accompanied with signs and wonders. Again, if you are referring to modern Churches you first have to prove or disprove that they are apostolic.

blessings

Stranger,

I AGREE with your offering. And all one NEED do is, 'as you have stated', PROVE whether a 'group' is 'apostolic' or NOT in order to PLAINLY see and KNOW if they are 'of The Spirit' or NOT.

If you have followed my postings, you will see that there are some pretty MAJOR doctrine followed by ALMOST EVERY denomination that IS plainly and UTTERLY 'false doctrine' according to the apostles.

That means IF the apostles TAUGHT ONE THING that is PERFECTLY CLEAR to those IN THE SPIRIT, and a 'church' teaches 'something DIFFERENT', then they are OBVIOULSY NOT apostolic.

I'm not going into that any DEEPER than I already HAVE over and over again here on the forums. But if you CARE to hear EXACTLY what I am refering to, PM me and I'll GLADLY offer what I have to 'back up' my statements.

Blessings,

MEC
 
Guys, I can't allow you to come in here and disrupt it with your RCC bickering, just because I locked the other thread. FoC, what I said was in reference to the other thread only. Joe and others, the only references to the word o God we want to see are verses proving or disproving the Church age is over.
 
Vic C. said:
Guys, I can't allow you to come in here and disrupt it with your RCC bickering, just because I locked the other thread. FoC, what I said was in reference to the other thread only. Joe and others, the only references to the word o God we want to see are verses proving or disproving the Church age is over.
Thanks for clarifying Vic.
Im more than willing to let the 'word of God' issue go as long as other members are willing to do the same.
:)
 
Cornelius said:
Its impossible for a Christian to be outside the church. They ARE the church.
Absolutely.
WE are His 'calling out' regardless of where we are.
Mat 18:20 For where two or three are gathered together in My name, I am there in their midst."
It only takes two.
Disagreement with that fact simply is out of line with the very words of Jesus Christ.

We are called to fellowship with our brethren for OUR sake...NOT to prove that we ARE the church.
Its possible for a Christian to be outside a denomination.
Not one place in the Bible does it speak of a denomination.
Which in essence are the basis of division. The Baptists dont agree with the Pentecostals. The Pentecostals think the Methodists are too stiff. The Methodists well, I cant really pinpoint what it is they do, but they certainly seem to have division among themselves about Calvinism vs Arminianism.

It was not supposed to be this way. Paul chastised the Corinthians from chapter 1 about dividing ourselves over trivial matters.

The Bible only speaks of the church at so-and-so. One church, meeting at different places.

We do not have that today, yet we hobble on, because its all we know.
And even churches in HOMES, which some denominations and other church entities seem to want to reject.

Rom 16:5 And greet the church that is in their house. Greet my beloved Epaenetus, who is the firstfruits of Achaia to Christ.

1Co 16:19 The churches of Asia greet you. Aquila and Priscilla greet you heartily in the Lord, together with the church that is in their house.

Col 4:15 Greet the brothers who are in Laodicea, and Nymphas and the church in his house.

Phm 1:2 to Apphia the beloved, and to Archippus our fellow soldier, and to the church at your house:
Seems a bit confused to demand that we fellowship ONLY at a 'church' building when scripture shows no lack of acceptance about home church.
Church buildings, oddly enough, did not come along for some time, tho that issue leads us right back into a CC/PC debate that we need to steer clear of.

-It only takes TWO.
-It doesnt have to be anywhere but our own homes.
-We shouldnt be divided over trivial disagreements, such as our understanding, or lack thereof, of things like predestination...or foods, or days, or clothes, or hair length, or any other trifling issue.
.
 
Rick W said:
I've heard of this general claim of overall apostasy before, that organized churches today are all corrupt and that it's no good to be a part of any of them.
I would definitely disagree with that accusation.
I know of a few churches around that Id bet a months pay that no corruption of the gospel could be found in. Ive known more that were corrupt than not, but its been that way for a very long time anyway.
Certainly Satan loves to get rooted into church bodies, but that doesnt mean he has won them all.
 
follower of Christ said:
Cornelius said:
Its impossible for a Christian to be outside the church. They ARE the church.
Absolutely.
WE are His 'calling out' regardless of where we are.
Mat 18:20 For where two or three are gathered together in My name, I am there in their midst."
It only takes two.
Disagreement with that fact simply is out of line with the very words of Jesus Christ. . .

-It only takes TWO.
-It doesnt have to be anywhere but our own homes.
-We shouldnt be divided over trivial disagreements, such as our understanding, or lack thereof, of things like predestination...or foods, or days, or clothes, or hair length, or any other trifling issue.
.

foC,

The question I have is this: Is ONE individual believer the Church?

I say no because one member of the body, eg a hand and the head of the Church in no way adequately reflects nor constitutes the body of Christ. The Church is clearly 'corporate'.

blessings
 
In the Body there ARE NO INDIVIDUALS per se.

Now a question for you:

Can a true follower of Christ be a Member of the Body and dwell within a 'house of demons'?

Blessings,

MEC
 
Vic C. said:
His views on salvation are very hyper-Calvinistic.
RC Sproul calls them "sub-Calvinists." I like that. I dont see that Hyper-Calvinists are even Calvinists.

I never read Camping, and do not know who he is. If you will excuse my musings, I would like to wrestle with this concept of "church age." I hear this term used mainly by dispensationalists. Is there a connection between Camping and dispensationalism? The standard dispensational teaching is that the Church age began at Pentecost and ends at the rapture of the Church.

I am not sure I am understanding all this.... how does Camping fit all this together? If the Church age is over, has not the rapture already occurred?

Or is this Camping fella using the term "Church age" in a different way?
 
MMarc said:
I believe the church age is over, apostasy has never been higher than now.

50 years ago the UK and Canada were 70% believers now it's at about 30 % for each nation.
I'm sure the in the rest of the world it is similar.

I think the kingdom of God is at hand, and that Jesus already walks the earth, He returns like a thief in the night to be revealed later on to ''all eyes.'' And even then if all eyes do see Jesus not all will recognize Jesus.

Just like the first time He came. The testimony of Jesus is the spirit of prophecy...

This below is something that I did on another site. But the WARNING seen is from day one on, and for ALL of Mankind as I see it. (Your post :crying as well!)

Rev. 22
[18] For I testify unto every man that heareth the words of the prophecy of this book, If any man shall add unto these things, God shall add unto him the plagues that are written in this book:

(and surely 'YOU' are hearing! or just blind & not seeing???)

[19] And if any man shall take away from the words of the book of this prophecy, God shall take away his part out of the book of life, and out of the holy city, and from the things which are written in this book.

(and the Book of Life is just found in this Book of Rev.?? And surely you know who put the chapter & the books together, huh? Jer. 17:5 ones! Even added the periods comas & verse numbers. And you are telling the Universe that Gods WORD 'TO [EVERY MAN]' HAD A BEGINNING!)

Some more Eternal WORD OF & FROM THE GODHEAD!

Eccl. 3
[14] I know that, whatsoever God doeth, (but saying is not DOING? HOG/WASH!) it shall be for ever: nothing can be put to it, nor any thing taken from it: and God doeth it, that men should fear before him.

(In case the devil missed it, this is almost a exact repeat of Rev. LAST WARNING! And yes, GOD SAID SO IN... Eccl. 1:9-10 + Eccl. 3:15

John 1
[14] And the Word was made flesh, and dwelt among us, (and we beheld his glory, the glory as of the only begotten of the Father,) full of grace and truth.

(And you do not believe that Christ is Christ/God in Eternity! Rev. 14:6. What in the world do you see the Heavenly 'MERCY SEAT OVER THE GODHEADS ARK IN THEIR 'MOST HOLY' THRONE ROOM' representing if not Their ETERNAL GOSPEL?? (please do not answer the question!)

But Forum, do read on:

Matt. 4
[3] And when the tempter came to him, he said, If thou be the Son of God, command that these stones be made bread.

[4] But he [[[CHRIST]]] answered and said, It is written, Man shall not live by bread alone, but by every word that proceedeth out of the mouth of God.

(and this verse came from where? O.T. And you do know who the BREAD or Manna represented, huh? The WORD OF GOD was & IS to be MANKINDS SPIRITUAL DIET, ALL 66 BOOKS! Even note that Abram
OBEYED GOD BY A VOICE IN 'THESE' COMMANDMENTS! See Gen. 26:5 BEFORE he became Abraham & even before the Ten Commandments were WRITTEN DOWN BY GOD)

Deut.8 (And Matt. 4:4's Eternal Truth came fro this chapter)
[1] All the commandments which I command thee this day shall ye observe to do, that ye may live, and multiply, and go in and possess the land which the LORD sware unto your fathers.

(and you are not looking to go in and possess that Land of promised canaan?)

[2] And thou shalt remember all the way which the LORD thy God led thee these forty years in the wilderness, to humble thee, and to prove thee, to know what was in thine heart, whether thou wouldest keep his commandments, or no.
[3] And he humbled thee, and suffered thee to hunger, and fed thee with manna, which thou knewest not, neither did thy fathers know; that he might make thee know that man doth not live by bread only, but by every word that proceedeth out of the mouth of the LORD doth man live.

(And the Eccl. 1:9-10 & Eccl. 3:15 verses tell us what the Last TESTING before we enter our Land of Cannon will be! 666 will be the 7Th Day Sabbath Testing to see if you are safe to save or not? Most are already set in satan's evil spiritual concrete! Eph. 6:12's kind!)

2 Tim. 3:16
[16] All scripture is given by inspiration of God, and is profitable for doctrine, for reproof, for correction, for instruction in righteousness:
[17] That the man of God may be perfect, throughly furnished unto all good works.
And who here will even be moved in BELIEVING IN ALL OF GODS WORDS? The Rev. 12:17 ones is all, so far!

So as per/thread topic?? I believe that the ones of Rev. 12:17 & Rev. 3:10 are to be SURELY the LAST CHURCH AGE, yet, FULLY UNITED with NO LOOSE CANNONS!
--Elijah
 
Vic C. said:
Guys, I can't allow you to come in here and disrupt it with your RCC bickering, just because I locked the other thread. FoC, what I said was in reference to the other thread only. Joe and others, the only references to the word o God we want to see are verses proving or disproving the Church age is over.

First, thanks for the first sentence, I don't feel like being chased around the forum... I have already offered to debate him, if he desires to continue with that subject and presuming he is able to offer an actual logical argument.

I apologize for posting a Vatican 2 document, but I felt that in the point I was making - that for the last 50 years, Catholicism has been a leading force in ecumenicism and that other Christians could benefit at least from THAT example - needed a citation.

I think proper ecumenicism doesn't mean we give up our beliefs, but that we accept others for where they are at in Christ. Recognizing that the Spirit blows where HE wills is instrumental in the spirit of ecumenicism. I think this is a legitimate advancement in Christian theology that we should ALL emulate, individually and corporately.

Again, as I said before, I do not want to make this a Catholic discussion.

Regards
 
francisdesales said:
Vic C. said:
Guys, I can't allow you to come in here and disrupt it with your RCC bickering, just because I locked the other thread. FoC, what I said was in reference to the other thread only. Joe and others, the only references to the word o God we want to see are verses proving or disproving the Church age is over.

First, thanks for the first sentence, I don't feel like being chased around the forum... I have already offered to debate him, if he desires to continue with that subject and presuming he is able to offer an actual logical argument.

I apologize for posting a Vatican 2 document, but I felt that in the point I was making - that for the last 50 years, Catholicism has been a leading force in ecumenicism and that other Christians could benefit at least from THAT example - needed a citation.

I think proper ecumenicism doesn't mean we give up our beliefs, but that we accept others for where they are at in Christ. Recognizing that the Spirit blows where HE wills is instrumental in the spirit of ecumenicism. I think this is a legitimate advancement in Christian theology that we should ALL emulate, individually and corporately.

Again, as I said before, I do not want to make this a Catholic discussion.

Regards

Hi, Elijah here. This is the K.J. on Matt. 6:22-24, & not the Douay that is in my bookrack. (hope that no one minds? ;) )

[22] The light of the body is the eye: if therefore thine eye be single, thy whole body shall be full of light.[23] But if thine eye be evil, thy whole body shall be full of darkness. If therefore the light that is in thee be darkness, how great is that darkness!

[24] No man can serve two masters: for either he will hate the one, and love the other; or else he will hold to the one, and despise the other. Ye cannot serve God and mammon.

OK: I find NO problem with who the ones of Rev. 17:1-5 are. (OPEN EYES) And the thread asks the question of the END OF THE CHURCH AGE?? (+)
Personally as 'i' see it, this is just one more of 'satans' diversions or Jude's many WINDS to confuse & DECEIVE THE VERY ELECT IF IT WERE POSSIBLE. None of the Rev. 17:5 ones believe satan;s no/organization, yet they still are called the Abomination of the Earth!

SO: The Bottom/line of Christ Words of Matt.6:24 finds ALL of these ones in the same 'spiritual' UNITIFIED BED TOGETHER. What more does satan need??
So what is the Rev. 17:1 Mother waiting for?? (whoever one believes that that is?)

These ones will need the UNITY OF CAESAR as well, huh? And Rom. 13 is even now being mis/applied all over the place for satan agenda! They all have NO UNITIFIED FORCE to pass laws for Church & state.. yet. (which they will have because they are as stated in Rev. 17:1-5 ... as being CHRIST/LESS with NO power, and Freedom Loving USA Caesar will go from Lamb/like to dragon like)

And then on the other hand with one not leting satan have free rain with his stuff, (Dan. 7:25) we will see another ORGANIZED FOLD as was done when Christ came the first time. Rev. 12:17 finds these shaken out of the last Laodicean church fold from Rev. 3:10 and the Acts Truth will again be repeated God says! Eccl. 1:9-10 & Eccl. 3:15. And just these two organized groups! (See Micah 2:12-13 for these prophesied repeated ones)

--Elijah[/b]
 
Back
Top