P
poetofparables
Guest
Yeah that to.I didn't ask you to read the Bible through. Just the gospel of John.
Join For His Glory for a discussion on how
https://christianforums.net/threads/a-vessel-of-honor.110278/
https://christianforums.net/threads/psalm-70-1-save-me-o-god-lord-help-me-now.108509/
Read through the following study by Tenchi for more on this topic
https://christianforums.net/threads/without-the-holy-spirit-we-can-do-nothing.109419/
Join Sola Scriptura for a discussion on the subject
https://christianforums.net/threads/anointed-preaching-teaching.109331/#post-1912042
Strengthening families through biblical principles.
Focus on the Family addresses the use of biblical principles in parenting and marriage to strengthen the family.
Read daily articles from Focus on the Family in the Marriage and Parenting Resources forum.
Yeah that to.I didn't ask you to read the Bible through. Just the gospel of John.
Sorry, Rev 20:11-15 does not say that those who do not receive the gift of eternal life will have eternal life in hell with satan being tormented alive forever while they are dead.This isn't about "all sinners", but only those who's names are not in the book of life; meaning those who did not receive the gift of eternal life through faith in Christ. Rev 20:11-15 is also very clear. They all will be joining the beast, false prophet and satan and all his fallen angels. Forever and ever. Not unambiguous at all.
And Destroyed means exactly that. And forever and ever means exactly that. And when someone is destroyed and remains destroyed forever and ever that doesn't mean that they remain undestroyed forever and ever.Apparantly you don't. Forever and ever means exactly that.
Really? Are you SURE about that?Excuse me, but Scripture NO WHERE says that anyone will "be no more".
No Free, I do not reject what is written in scripture. But you do.OK, so you reject what IS written in Scripture: Rev 20:10-15.
This is GREAT! That is the way to be. I wish I went to that church, even if they disagreed with me on every doctrine.At the church I recently worked at for a while this is emphasized a lot. The pastor is always telling people to read the Bible for what it actually says and not reading into it what other people say it says. There's a big difference. It's one thing to ask (or read material from) those more educated about things like history, context, etc., but the important thing is to focus mainly on what the actual Bible actually says and weigh everything you hear against that. He even takes it so far as to admit when the Bible contradicts their own church policies or doctrines and as far as it depends on him doesn't hesitate to work to change things to align with the Bible when he recognizes that.
Showing disrespect to Jesus Christ mattersIt doesn't matter if I say Jesus is wrong. Because to you I am wrong, and that should not offend you unless I am right.
It means there's more than one God to reject, not just one.
Let's consider some facts.Sorry, Rev 20:11-15 does not say that those who do not receive the gift of eternal life will have eternal life in hell with satan being tormented alive forever while they are dead.
But being "tormented" clearly denotes a conscious awareness, one must understand the range of meanings of "destroyed". If it always means annihilation, as you think, then one CANNOT be tormented, 'cause they wouldn't be around to be tormented. That's how we figure out what Scripture means. BECAUSE those in the second death (lake of fire) ARE tormented forever and ever, PROVES that they haven't been annihilated.And Destroyed means exactly that. And forever and ever means exactly that.
Please don't keep ignoring the meaning of "tormented day and night forever and ever". Your understanding of 'destroyed' cannot mean annihilated because of Rev 20:10.And when someone is destroyed and remains destroyed forever and ever that doesn't mean that they remain undestroyed forever and ever.
Well, you've either ignored or rejected the meaning of "tormented" in Rev 20:10. I don't know which, but maybe you could tell me. For me, to ignore Scripture is to reject it. So either way, your view has no support from Scripture.No Free, I do not reject what is written in scripture. But you do.
It is best to avoid projecting our own ideas into something which we cannot fully understand. The facts are as follows:It could be a replay of the events of this world, relived over and over and therefore the events are described as eternal suffering, while in eternity the events are actually in the past.
What support do you have from Scripture for this view? How can eternity, which is in the future from our perspective, be events that "are actually in the past". Wouldn't that just be a bad dream or nightmare?This thread is not very different than the one about rethinking hell. Why is there eternal suffering? Sometimes words have more than one meaning. In other words, the lake of fire could be a place where souls are tormented because the false prophet and the beast are there. It could be a replay of the events of this world, relived over and over and therefore the events are described as eternal suffering, while in eternity the events are actually in the past.
Why is eternal suffering necessary.
Stop. Here is where you are disagreeing with scripture.Let's consider some facts.
1. Rev 19:20 - And the beast was seized, and with him the false prophet who performed the signs in his presence, by which he deceived those who had received the mark of the beast and those who worshiped his image; these two were thrown alive into the lake of fire which burns with brimstone. NASB
a. 2 human beings are "thrown ALIVE" into the lake of fire. They don't suffer physical death.
Thank you for the response. Yes of course from our perspective eternity would seem like the future. However from eternity all things temporal have already passed. That is easily proven in that there exists the proclaiming of future events by prophets even to very exact detail. The bible speaks of all events as in the past after this manner, right up to the opening of a new scroll by the Lamb slain.What support do you have from Scripture for this view? How can eternity, which is in the future from our perspective, be events that "are actually in the past". Wouldn't that just be a bad dream or nightmare?
Yes these are future events to us here in a temporal existence. But I am suggesting that these events are in time, and therefore when we read about eternal torment and eternal damnation, it may be referring to a scene played over and over in heaven. Here again is a scripture that appears to be speaking from a point in time after the tribulation period and after the wrath of God.The wording of Rev 20 isn't vague at all. There are going to be future events.
1. antichrist and false prophet will be thrown alive into the lake of fire. Rev 19:20
2. the devil (satan) will be thrown into the lake of fire, and THEY (all of them) will be tormented day and night (24/7) forever and ever. Rev 20:10
3. human beings who do not possess the gift of eternal life will be cast into the lake of fire. Rev 20:15
Unless one can demonstrate from the text that there is more than one "lake of fire", we know that satan, the antichrist, his false prophet, and all of humanity who never received the gift of eternal life will end up there, and THEY ALL will be tormented day and night forever and ever. Future events.
Respectfully, I think I am being misunderstood. I am familiar with the scriptures you have provided. None of them are in disagreement with what I have said. I also am not sure what you mean when you say about a "literal lake of fire, there is no need to spiritualize this". For I do not contest the existence of a literal lake of fire.It is best to avoid projecting our own ideas into something which we cannot fully understand. The facts are as follows:
Rev 21:8
8But the fearful, and unbelieving, and the abominable, and murderers, and whoremongers, and sorcerers, and idolaters, and all liars, shall have their part in the lake which burneth with fire and brimstone: which is the second death.
Rev 22:15
For without are dogs, and sorcerers, and whoremongers, and murderers, and idolaters, and whosoever loveth and maketh a lie.
Rev 14:9-11
9And the third angel followed them, saying with a loud voice, If any man worship the beast and his image, and receive his mark in his forehead, or in his hand,
10The same shall drink of the wine of the wrath of God, which is poured out without mixture into the cup of his indignation; and he shall be tormented with fire and brimstone in the presence of the holy angels, and in the presence of the Lamb:
11And the smoke of their torment ascendeth up for ever and ever: and they have no rest day nor night, who worship the beast and his image, and whosoever receiveth the mark of his name.
1. There is a literal Lake of Fire (no need to spiritualize this)
2. This is the second death (the first being physical)
3. All sinners, evildoers and idolaters who do not repent are in Hell
4. Hell is a manifestation of the wrath of God against sin and evil
5. Hell is a place of torment (body and soul)
6. Hell is comprised of fire and brimstone (eternal and intense burning)
7. Since burning produce smoke, there is the smoke of torment also
8. Hell is indeed eternal -- for ever and ever can mean nothing less
9. The inhabitants of Hell will never rest day nor night
IF THIS IS A TERRIBLE PICTURE, THAT IS EXACTLY WHAT IT IS.
Let's consider some facts.
1. Rev 19:20 - ...
a. 2 human beings are "thrown ALIVE" into the lake of fire.
Sorry for the misunderstanding. I was referring to "Events from the past"... "relived over and over" in your post. Since that is not part of the biblical description, it would be unwise to suggest this. It is a possibility, but then again there is a possibility that the focus would be on the future, and how awful that will be since it will never end. If we limit our understanding to what is written e.g. "Where their worm dieth not, and the fire is not quenched" it is terrible enough. Worms feed on dead bodies, but to have worms feeding on living bodies over and over for eternity? That speaks of the exclusion of hope of restoration, and the eternality of the punishment (Vine).Respectfully, I think I am being misunderstood.
Of course the wicked perish -- not only die -- but die horrible deaths, especially those judgments shown in the Revelation. But that is not the end of the matter. After a horrible physical death, there is something even worse -- the eternal Lake of Fire (Rev 20:11-15). THIS IS THE SECOND DEATH. Separation of the sinner from God for all eternity. Death is separation. The first death is separation of the soul and spirit from the body.If the wicked don't perish, then you have a contradiction with the scripture that says that they do
Actually when I referred to "Events from the past"... "relived over and over", I was pointing out that Isaiah 66: 23-24 seems to be saying exactly that. When I say reliving over and over, I am meaning that those who are viewing the mountain of flesh, where the worm dieth not, and the fire is not quenched, are looking upon a past event replayed every Sabbath. Yes it is supposed to be abhorrent. Is flesh not simply in scientific terminology just matter? Is it not just made from the dust?Sorry for the misunderstanding. I was referring to "Events from the past"... "relived over and over" in your post. Since that is not part of the biblical description, it would be unwise to suggest this. It is a possibility, but then again there is a possibility that the focus would be on the future, and how awful that will be since it will never end. If we limit our understanding to what is written e.g. "Where their worm dieth not, and the fire is not quenched" it is terrible enough. Worms feed on dead bodies, but to have worms feeding on living bodies over and over for eternity? That speaks of the exclusion of hope of restoration, and the eternality of the punishment (Vine).