Sure, I like simple requests.
[John 6:44 NASB] 44 "No one can come to Me unless the Father who sent Me draws[G1670] him; and I will raise him up on the last day.
[G1670] ἑλκύω helkýō, hel-koo'-o; probably akin to G138; to drag (literally or figuratively):—draw
Here are other uses of the same word:
[John 6:44 NASB] 44 "No one can come to Me unless the Father who sent Me draws[G1670] him; and I will raise him up on the last day.
- The verse in question where GOD HIMSELF does the dragging.
[John 12:32 NASB] 32 "And I, if I am lifted up from the earth, will draw[G1670] all men to Myself."
- Since Jesus is God, this is the same sort of example as the verse in question and adds no clarity.
[John 18:10 NASB] 10 Simon Peter then, having a sword, drew[G1670] it and struck the high priest's slave, and cut off his right ear; and the slave's name was Malchus.
- Did the sword have a choice to be drawn or refuse to be drawn? Rather, was the drawing of the sword not completely the decision of the person drawing it. If the sword had remained in its scabbard, would anyone still say that Peter had “drawn” his sword? No, the sword must have come when Peter drew it or the sword was not drawn.
[John 21:6 NASB] 6 And He said to them, "Cast the net on the right-hand side of the boat and you will find [a catch.]" So they cast, and then they were not able to haul[G1670] it in because of the great number of fish. ...
- Here the fish and the net refused to come into the boat ... so it says they were NOT ABLE TO “haul” it. Again, to be drawn, the action must be accomplished. Is there any doubt that GOD could have hauled a net into the boat?
[John 21:11 NASB] 11 Simon Peter went up and drew[G1670] the net to land, full of large fish, a hundred and fifty-three; and although there were so many, the net was not torn.
- Peter drew the net because the net and fish came. The fish probably did not want to come, but it was not the desire of the fish that determined the outcome ... Peter irresistibly drew the fish by force using the net.
[Acts 16:19 NASB] 19 But when her masters saw that their hope of profit was gone, they seized Paul and Silas and dragged[G1670] them into the market place before the authorities,
- Paul and Silas probably had no desire to visit the authorities. The crowd employed force to irresistibly draw them to the location. If the crowd had not been able to move them, it would not have said that they were “dragged” into the marketplace. Again the action must happen to be [G1670] and the desires of the subject being dragged is not the important factor.
[Act 21:30 NASB] 30 Then all the city was provoked, and the people rushed together, and taking hold of Paul they dragged[G1670] him out of the temple, and immediately the doors were shut.
- Would Paul have been “dragged” out of the temple if Paul still remained inside the temple? We’re Paul’s desires the deciding factor?
[James 2:6 NASB] 6 But you have dishonored the poor man. Is it not the rich who oppress you and personally drag[G1670] you into court?
- Does the poor man get to choose whether or not he is dragged into court? If the poor man never goes to court then was he dragged to court?
In every case where the word is used, it requires the action to be successful and it is done irrespective of the desires of the person or object being drawn/hauled/dragged. Why is God drawing [G1670] men to Jesus treated so differently?
There is a Greek word for “invite”, but that is not what Jesus said.