- Thread starter
- #341
The historical, orthodox position of Christianity is that Jesus is God in human flesh.The historical, orthodox position of Christianity is that Jesus is God in human flesh, because this is what Scripture states.
Well, you did completely ignore everything I posted. I may as well have posted my grocery list. There was no attempt to engage any biblical text nor any argument. My comment about being "fairly naive" was because you claim to be a biblical scholar, one of the best on the person of Jesus, if I remember correctly, so you really should know that your claim--"They said he said God was his father. And then their custom meant that Jesus was part of God's family."--simply isn't at all accurate. To be the Son of God is a much stronger claim, as was being a son of a particular father. I was just meaning that it seems to be a fairly uninformed position for someone who claims to be a biblical scholar.
What I say about Scripture is my simply opinion about what I believe it is saying, based on study. I believe my view is correct just as you believe your view is correct.
No, I don't do that. Staff does not do that.
Fair enough, but there were no Christians and those same apostles became the first Christians. They baptized people with water during Jesus's ministry and then at the end of his ministry, Jesus commands them to go make more disciples and baptize them. There is nothing to suggest that it isn't without water, which is why we see it continue in the NT with water.
We can try, but if we're going to discuss the deity of Jesus, we cannot limit it to one verse at a time. Well, about almost any topic we shouldn't limit it to one verse at a time since context really, really matters. With Jesus's deity, there is just so much that has to be taken into account.
I believe if Jesus was on this site he would not be able to say who he is. And that's what I think about the historical, orthodox position of Christianity.
who claims to be a biblical scholar.
Oh no I never said I was a biblical scholar. I said I was one of the most knowledgeable men on the planet concerning the subject of the resurrected Christ Jesus.
There is nothing to suggest that it isn't without water.
There is nothing to suggest it was water since water produces nothing. It did nothing for Israel. It redeemed nobody. It saved nobody from sin. It got nobody saved. It's used as a word to describe immersion and used that way in the New Testament as a Rite from the Old Testament when they used to immerse in water.