Solo said:
It is imperative to understand the truth behind being born of the flesh and being born of the Spirit. All individuals are born of the flesh, but only those that repent, believe, and follow Jesus Christ are born of God, born of the Spirit, born again. It is those who are born of God that will see and enter the Kingdom of God. Those that are born of the flesh are born of the flesh one time and one time only; those born of the Spirit are born of the Spirit one time and one time only. Any disagreement with these statements will cause a disagreement in all things spiritual between individuals discussing God's Salvation.
I have no problem with this statement. We also believe that we can only be baptized once, born again with water and the Spirit once in this life. But again, I tell you that this doesn't guarantee our entering into heaven.
Solo said:
The flesh is sold under sin and is corrupt and mortal until the day that Jesus returns. At that time the flesh will put on incorruption and immortality. The New Creature that is born of God does not sin while in the flesh, nor can it sin. That which is born of God cannot sin.
Whosoever is born of God doth not commit sin; for his seed remaineth in him: and he cannot sin, because he is born of God. 1 John 3:8-10
We've been down this road before. John's manner of writing is not to be taken as an absolute, but as an axiom, a rule of thumb that describes a general way of lilfe. John also writes to "born again Christians" the following:
If we say that we have no sin, we deceive ourselves, and the truth is not in us. If we confess our sins, he is faithful and just to forgive us [our] sins, and to cleanse us from all unrighteousness. If we say that we have not sinned, we make him a liar, and his word is not in us. 1 John 1:8-10
John recognizes the Christians sin - but have an advocate in Jesus Christ. Those who claim they are sinless are liars and Christ's word is not in them...Your interpretation would contradict with 1 John 1.
Solo said:
A Christian believer is one who is born of the flesh and born of the Spirit. The sinful flesh coexists with the non-sinful spirit, and these two creatures determine moment by moment which law they will follow. When the non-sinful spirit reigns on the throne of self, sin is not accomplished, and righteousness reigns; when the sinful flesh reigns on the throne of self, sin is accomplished and evil reigns.
Those who are not born of God are only born of the flesh, and they can only do the goodness of the flesh which according to Jesus is not good. Jesus said that there is none good, but God.
While I agree with what you say, I also will note that Jesus says WE can do no good without Him. As I mentioned before, man is fashioned to be made holy by God because of the transformation caused by the Spirit.
Solo said:
Those that abide in Jesus Christ have an opportunity to obey or not to obey depending on whether they are walking in the flesh or walking in the born again spirit. Those that walk according to the flesh are walking in disobedience to Jesus Christ. Those that walk according to the born again spirit are walking in obedience to Jesus Christ.
Unbelievers have no choice to walk in the spirit as they have not been born of God. They will only be born of God when they repent, believe, and follow Jesus Christ
I agree... But we should be open to the fact that the Spirit of God blows where He wills, and that even the pagans can follow the Law written on their hearts (cf Rom 2). Thus, we should be careful about judging others by what organization they belong to, but rather, what is the fruits of their works.
Solo said:
Jesus did all that he did in love, however, there are those in this forum who would berate another for standing firm on the word and calling another out for teaching lies, heresies, false teachings, etc.
It is one thing to "call another out for teaching lies" and another to condemn someone to hell because they don't agree with another's particular interpretion of Scriptures. While Scripture ITSELF is inspired by God, one's own interpretation is NOT. It takes careful discernment to understand the depths of Scripture - one should not be so quick to judge another's point of view - as the Spirit of God does not fully reveal Himself to an individual. This knowledge comes gradually as part of our growth. It is then not unusual that some may understand particular portions of Scripture better than others. As such, when the Spirit leads us, we should readjust our particular thoughts and ideas on Scripture's teachings.
Also, it is not an act of humility to berate someone who may not be as advanced in Scriptural learning as another. Some are at different points of sanctification. As such, we are called to be patient with others - rather than condemning them.
Solo said:
I see the antichrist riding into the world by being acclaimed by the false prophet that he is God. I believe that this false prophet will be the one acclaimed by the eccumenical body of religion pushed onto the world. I believe that the Roman Catholic Institution will be the main religious organization behind this One World Religion.
You would disagree with me on the basis that you are Roman Catholic, not on the basis of the truths that I have been taught by the Holy Spirit these last 23 years.
You are certainly entitled to believe that. Sadly, you are being misled because of your prejudice against the Catholic Church. However, the bible says that the antichrist is one who will deny that Jesus Christ is the Son of the Father and that Jesus Christ has NOT come in the flesh. Do you really believe that the Catholic Church has EVER taught that???
Who is a liar but he that denieth that Jesus is the Christ? He is antichrist, that denieth the Father and the Son. 1 Jo 2:22
And every spirit that confesseth not that Jesus Christ is come in the flesh is not of God: and this is that [spirit] of antichrist, whereof ye have heard that it should come; and even now already is it in the world. 1 Jo 4:3
As to a "One World Religion", I don't see the Catholic Church behind that, either. While the Church preaches ecumenicism, this does not mean that we cut out our own beliefs so that we can all join together as one big happy family, ignoring the very real differences that continue to exist. This is relativism, one that the current Pope has written against often enough. The current Pope also wrote an encyclical called "Dominus Iesus" less than 10 years ago that reaffirmed that Jesus Christ was the ONLY way to salvation. While ecumenicism opens the doors of understanding to other faiths, recognizing that there is some truth to ALL religions, the Church will not put aside the task given to it by Christ Himself - and the gates of hell shall not prevail against it.
Solo said:
Yes we do know that we are sealed by the Holy Spirit until the day of redemption;
Your interpretation of being sealed until the day of redemption means that such verses as Hebrews 10:26-27 contradict. Does the Spirit give the truth or not?
For if we sin wilfully after that we have received the knowledge of the truth, there remaineth no more sacrifice for sins, But a certain fearful looking for of judgment and fiery indignation, which shall devour the adversaries. Heb 10:26-27
There are a number of such verses in Scriptures - also in the Old Testament. Being sealed doesn't mean we will enter heaven. Recall Saul of the Old Testament?
Solo said:
There will be no flesh or blood to inherit the kingdom of God. That is why the flesh of those born of God must be changed at Jesus' return. The New Creature born of God is signed, sealed, and delivered into the inheritance given by the promise of God.
You are making a connection that is not there. 1 Cor 15 describes that the natural flesh will not inherit heaven because nothing corruptible shall enter it. Flesh is not a permanent thing. The spirit is because it has no parts that will waste away or are subject to decay. Thus, our natural bodies must become something else - GLORIFIED flesh, as Christ's own human flesh became. This has nothing to do with "being sealed and delivered by the Holy Spirit". This is merely a discussion to the Corinthians on the mechanics of the bodily resurrection, not a dissertation on how all men who declare Jesus as Lord will enter eternal heaven...
And as we have borne the image of the earthy, we shall also bear the image of the heavenly. Now this I say, brethren, that flesh and blood cannot inherit the kingdom of God; neither doth corruption inherit incorruption. Behold, I shew you a mystery; We shall not all sleep, but we shall all be changed, 1 Cor 15:49-51
The same applies to Phillipians. Our current fleshy, corruptible self will be changed to an incorruptible self. This describes our material condition that will exist in heaven, not a guarantee that ALL will enter heaven.
Solo said:
The entire Scripture is for our growth during justification and sanctification. The entire Scripture is inspired of God, not just the gospels, but the entire Scripture. Paul's writings are considered Scripture by Peter.
I never said anything to that effect. Of course the entire Scriputres are inspired, including the Old Testament Deuterocannonicals. I realize that Paul's writings are inspired and never said anything to the effect that they weren't. I merely asked you why study the often-confusing writings of Paul FIRST, when Jesus Christ is God in visible form? If you want a relationship with God, if you want to know who God is, then you should study Jesus Christ and the Gospels FIRST.
Solo said:
Do not let yourself be deceived that one portion of the Scriptures is more important than other portions. That is a trick of the devil.
Apparently, you seem to believe that Paul is more important. However, sending a new believer to Paul can be a big mistake. Consider this:
even as our beloved brother Paul also according to the wisdom given unto him hath written unto you; As also in all [his] epistles, speaking in them of these things; in which are some things hard to be understood, which they that are unlearned and unstable wrest, as [they do] also the other scriptures, unto their own destruction 2 Peter 3:15b-16
Now, why would you send a new Christian to read what Scripture ITSELF calls "hard to understand, which they that are learned and unstable wrest...unto their own destruction"?
I find this a bit disconcerting, like giving a child a book of matches in the physical realm...
Solo said:
What is your teaching concerning being born of God? What would you share with them from the gospels? What is your teaching concerning ones assurance of salvation? What is your teaching concerning how one is to be saved?
That would take up a lot of bandwidth to cover in one post. If I was to look to one verse, I would look to 1 John 5:12, as I have already related. To give you a general idea on the rest, I would show that God desires a familial relationship with man - that His entire salvation plan is based upon this desire of God. By showing that God is love and is reaching out to us, man is expected to respond in a covenantal relationship. As such, a covenant requires a committment, one of loving obedience. To be saved requires that we respond to the gifts that God gives the individual. Thus, we are expected to repent and convert - conversion means to change our life, not just make a one-time statement. This is just a quick basic layout.
Regards