If they confessed and forsook their sins by the symbolic OT sacrifice, their sins were forgiven.
Read the following verses closely, especially the "not possible" part. No OT sacrifice could take sin away. They were symbols of Christ and of what He would endure and achieve.
[
Heb 10:3-4,
6 KJV]
3 But in those [sacrifices there is] a remembrance again [made] of sins every year.
4 For [it is]
not possible that the blood of bulls and of goats should take away sins. ...
6
In burnt offerings and [sacrifices] for sin thou hast had no pleasure.
Then go to law in the OT and find where putting an innocent man to death is just. They knew it wasn't, so they falsely accused him.
Christ was guilty, not innocent. He was guilty because He took upon Himself, according to the Father's will, the sins of those He came to save. Had He not been guilty no one would be saved
That Christ was crucified was the will of the Father.
[
Mat 16:21-23 KJV] 21
From that time forth began Jesus to shew unto his disciples, how that he must go unto Jerusalem, and suffer many things of the elders and chief priests and scribes, and be killed, and be raised again the third day.
22 Then Peter took him, and began to rebuke him, saying,
Be it far from thee, Lord: this
shall not be unto thee.
23 But he turned, and said unto Peter,
Get thee behind me, Satan: thou art an offence unto me: for thou savourest not the things that be of God, but those that be of men.
[
2Co 5:21 KJV - thanks brightfame52)
21
For he hath
made him [to be] sin for us, who knew no sin;
that we might be made the righteousness of God in him.
[
1Pe 1:18-20 KJV - thanks brightfame52)
18 Forasmuch as ye know that ye were
not redeemed with corruptible things, [as] silver and gold, from your vain conversation [received] by tradition from your fathers;
19
But with the precious blood of Christ, as of a lamb without blemish and without spot:
20 Who verily was foreordained before the foundation of the world, but was manifest in these last times for you,
No. The reason for "his offering" was to show mercy toward those who sinned against him. What they did to him, was the sin he took upon himself. Crucifying him was sin...and he bore it. He endured false witness and abuse against himself in human flesh, as his Father does everyday in Spirit.
Which verses? Who do you think sinned against Him?
Right. They wouldn't have done it because what they did to him was sinful.
Nope, it is Satan who wouldn't have allowed them to do it had he known of God's plan. You're twisting the verses.
The "princes of this world" were/are satan's minions.
[1Co 2:8 KJV]
8 Which
none of the princes of this world knew: for had they known [it], they would not have crucified the Lord of glory.
Simply, those who have heard and learned of God from the OT scriptures go to the Son,....because the Son is the same as his Father.
Simply NOT! Only it is only those who have heard has LEARNED of God. To have "learned of God", does not mean just being taught but of learning - learning through God. If someone learns of God, it means the lesson has been
infused into the person to have learned, because natural man cannot learn things of the Spirit.
[Rom 8:7 KJV] 7 Because
the carnal mind [is] enmity against God: for it is not subject to the law of God, neither indeed can be.
[Rom 12:2 KJV]
2 And be not conformed to this world: but be ye
transformed by the renewing of your mind, that ye may prove what [is] that good, and acceptable, and perfect, will of God.
Pauls' eyes were opened because he shut them when he fell on the ground. He didn't realise he was blind until he "opened his eyes" (until he opened his eyelids.)
Wrong. "his eyes were opened", opened, period! Look, you are distorting the Bible - forcing it to say something it just doesn't say. So, since you insist on that, I'm going to discontinue this discussion with you.
[Act 9:8 KJV] 8 And Saul arose from the earth; and when
his eyes were opened, he saw no man: but they led him by the hand, and brought [him] into Damascus.