What's new
By:
Filters
Christian Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

  • Focus on the Family

    Strengthening families through biblical principles.

    Focus on the Family addresses the use of biblical principles in parenting and marriage to strengthen the family.

    Read daily articles from Focus on the Family in the Marriage and Parenting Resources forum.

  • The Gospel of Jesus Christ

    Heard of "The Gospel"? Want to know more?

    There is salvation in no other, for there is not another name under heaven having been given among men, by which it behooves us to be saved."

    Read The Gospel Online.

  • Site Restructuring

    The site is currently undergoing some restructuring, which will take some time. Sorry for the inconvenience if things are a little hard to find right now.

    Please let us know if you find any new problems with the way things work and we will get them fixed. You can always report any problems or difficulty finding something in the Talk With The Staff / Report a site issue forum.

Is Jesus really God ?

Donations

Total amount
$1,642.00
Goal
$5,080.00
Donate View
zionwarrior]I do agree with Asyncritus said:
Because the team there are experienced in a whole range of areas including communication, and mediating these kinds of discussions. Unfortunately it is yet to take off because, I believe, people are fearfull of such a structured environment.
Click to expand...
No, that's probably not the reason at all. Forums just take a long time to get going, if they ever do.

In case you had not noticed, this is a very large forum. It would be a full-time job for several people to mediate every discussion.
 
zionwarrior said:
back at you brother ...
Click to expand...

Back at you nothing. You haven't provided any evidence to back up your historical contention. Thus, you should retract what you said about Constantine. Discussion on the Trinity, whether they are Biblically warranted or not, are ultimately dependent upon HOW you read the Scriptures and your paradigm before you begin. There is nothing you can "prove" at that level.

zionwarrior said:
Is there really a point in discussing matters such as "Trinity" with someone who won't even listen to the word of God?
Click to expand...

You forgot to add in "according to me". And that is my point. In these discussions on theology and the Trinity, it is going to end up being your interpretation and ignoring the implications of particular Scriptures vs what the Church has said those verses mean, such as Phil 2:5-11.

Certainly, you can take those verses and twist it to mean something else to fit your belief system. However, that is not how the writers of the Scriptures and those who immediately heard/read them interpreted them. This is why some knowledge of history is very helpful here (despite you considering them "inane")

Regards
 
zionwarrior said:
Francisdesales has already stated "The doctrine of the Trinity is profound and requires looking at Scriptures through a particular mindset."

He and others have demonstraited they are only prepared to debate from their given 'mindset' and while I may have begun with an open mind, my mind has now become closed due to my perception of the combative environment.
Click to expand...

Typical liberal gibberish foisted upon our society. This is right down the alley of what a liberal would say...

This in effect says that "Because my opinion is correct, any other possible deviation is a closing of the mind by my interlocutor". Thus, you must preach to the unwashed masses with your "open mind". The liberal mindset at work - who must think for the rest of us "closed minded" folks who happen to have a different opinion.

Don't you see your argument can be said completely without change right back at you? You claim to be a teacher, and this is how you address a difference of opinion? By an "argument from authority of self"? Declaring yourself "open minded" is a logical fallacy, especially when you have not really addressed any Scriptures. You merely reject them out of hand without comment.

But of course, since anything that confirms "Trinity" must be a closed-minded point of view. Notice how you must even ignore history to maintain your "open-minded" point of view...

Kettle, meet pot...

Regards
 
zionwarrior said:
,He and others have demonstraited they are only prepared to debate from their given 'mindset' and while I may have begun with an open mind, my mind has now become closed due to my perception of the combative environment.
Click to expand...
Umm, excuse me????

You have repeatedly ignored clear arguments that challenge your position.

This speaks rather loudly as to the "open-ness" of your mind.
 
You are excused ...

Chill ladies, no need to get your knickers all up in a bunch ...
The truth is there in 'black and white' , it only gets blury when you try to read between the lines. :)
 
zionwarrior said:
You are excused ...

Chill ladies, no need to get your knickers all up in a bunch ...
The truth is there in 'black and white' , it only gets blury when you try to read between the lines. :)
Click to expand...
You are still evading. The facts are clear: a number of clear arguments for Jesus' divinity have been presented that you have repeatedly been asked to engage.

And you continue your silence. The reader will only have one logical conclusion: Since you (ZW) are clearly motivated to find errors in these arguments, the fact that you refuse to respond to them suggests that you can find no errors in them.

This is a place where we debate. And this means actually dealing with arguments that challenge your position. A bald declaration that "its there in black and white" is clear evasion.
 
jasoncran said:
kettle met pot,lol
Click to expand...
Excuse me?!

If you are suggesting that I am engaging in the same evasion as ZW, I suggest you have simply not been reading the thread. Perhaps this is not what you are implying, but it sure sounds like it.
 
Drew said:
Excuse me?!

If you are suggesting that I am engaging in the same evasion as ZW, I suggest you have simply not been reading the thread. Perhaps this is not what you are implying, but it sure sounds like it.
Click to expand...

no, that was me laughing at what francis said.

rather the sarcastic way he said that.

i must use that as a sentence when the situation occurs elsewhere.
 
zionwarrior said:
You are excused ...

Chill ladies, no need to get your knickers all up in a bunch ...
The truth is there in 'black and white' , it only gets blury when you try to read between the lines. :)
Click to expand...
Please cease with the ad hominems.

For someone who has shamelessly plugged their website, you have given no reason for anyone to want to join.
 
jasoncran said:
i should have clarified that better.

when i posted that.
Click to expand...
While we may not agree on some things, I want to say that I have noticed that you are a very polite, charitable poster who clearly demonstrates respect for others. This is, of course, a good witness and a model for the rest of us to follow.
 
Drew said:
You are still evading. The facts are clear: a number of clear arguments for Jesus' divinity have been presented that you have repeatedly been asked to engage.

And you continue your silence. The reader will only have one logical conclusion: Since you (ZW) are clearly motivated to find errors in these arguments, the fact that you refuse to respond to them suggests that you can find no errors in them.

This is a place where we debate. And this means actually dealing with arguments that challenge your position. A bald declaration that "its there in black and white" is clear evasion.
Click to expand...

Sorry, wasnt it you that said a while back that its pointless to discuss at scripture level, and it must all be looked at as a whole ?

Ok, give me one clear un-convoluted argument that I can address ...
 
zionwarrior said:
Sorry, wasnt it you that said a while back that its pointless to discuss at scripture level, and it must all be looked at as a whole ?

Ok, give me one clear un-convoluted argument that I can address ...
Click to expand...

I have started a thread called: "Trinitarianism: What Non-Trinitarians believe". I have not finished editing it, but perhaps I will be done soon. When I'm done we will see if the Mods here will let me post it here, or post a link.
 
We see the Deity of Christ as God in His designation as the Mighty God Isa 9:

6For unto us a child is born, unto us a son is given: and the government shall be upon his shoulder: and his name shall be called Wonderful, Counsellor, The mighty God, The everlasting Father, The Prince of Peace.

That same designation is used again in the same book a chapter later Isa 10:

20And it shall come to pass in that day, that the remnant of Israel, and such as are escaped of the house of Jacob, shall no more again stay upon him that smote them; but shall stay upon the LORD, the Holy One of Israel, in truth.

21The remnant shall return, even the remnant of Jacob, unto the mighty God.​
 
zionwarrior said:
Sorry, wasnt it you that said a while back that its pointless to discuss at scripture level, and it must all be looked at as a whole ?

Ok, give me one clear un-convoluted argument that I can address ...
Click to expand...
I know that you will not engage these arguments - you have seen them before, but they are in posts 121, 122, and 140.

But I will publically guarantee that you will not address these arguments in any fashion that would be considered serious by any objective reader.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Donations

Total amount
$1,642.00
Goal
$5,080.00
Donate View
Back
Top