From what I understand that John Stott is saying is that there is not physical pain and annihilationism = suffering in hell is not forever, or they will cease to exist. I know that he doesn't out-right say it like I did, but that's what I got out of it.
Hi jeff,
I'd like to begin by thanking you for your kind and humble words in this post, but I do believe you might be reading into his statement a bit. Basically he is saying, that simply finding the idea of eternal torment in hell morally and emotionally challenging is not enough to question it's basis. We must go back to the Scriptures to examine all the passages on the matter to come to the most consistent and accurate conclusion.
He didn't speak about the nature of what annihilationism is, as the term itself I believe is not well suited but rather prone to misrepresentation.
As I demonstrated in my posts I hold to a view much like John Stott here, that I believe the fate of the wicked is their ultimate demise, to face the wages of their sin which is death and endure the punishment of eternal fire which results in the destruction of both soul and body in Gehenna (hell). In this destruction though, I believe it is not an instantaneous zapping in which those destroyed do not undergo any kind of pain, but rather the totality of their consuming will be dreadful thing to endure, and indeed will cause immense physical pain. It is a violent end, where God's wrath is poured out on evil to be forever destroyed so that his anger will be satisfied and there will be peace, love and goodness to remain in all God's creation.
I will look up John Stott.
I highly recommend him on a number of different subjects, he is a great commentator, though that doesn't mean I agree with him on every issue.
I can tell by the way you write that you have more knowledge of the scripture on this topic than I do.
You are too kind, I have gone on a journey with this doctrine in the past few months that led me to do a lot of research which ultimately changed my mind on the subject.
Most, but not all of the reason I believe that eternal physical pain is real is because of what I have been taught by pastors, Sunday school teachers, Christian authors etc... I know I need more and that is why I am digging deeper.
This was also what I was taught and believed for most of my journey with Christ thus far, and it was not until I was studying the Parable of the Rich Man and Lazarus that I discovered that I had been taught some wrong things about the after-life. So, from there I decided I would take a look at the entirety of what the Bible has to say about life after death, and to me it made God's Character make more sense, Scripture more consistent and the gospel more relevant and powerful.
Doesn't God want us to be black and white on something this crucial?
I understand your frustration on this part, though I think if the wicked were truly to endure suffering forever and ever then it would have been made irrefutable in Scripture, that the preaching in Acts would be laced with it (no mention of hell or eternal torment in Acts) or that it would mentioned if not made explicit from the beginning of creation that this was the punishment for sin. However, from the beginning the punishment for sin has been death.
I think if we take off much our western glasses, which have been so influenced by paganistic and platonistic thinking, and come with a mind more like those of the ancient Hebrews it would clear up much of the confusion.
Death is our problem.. the Resurrection of Jesus is our hope!