Chopper
Member
Wow, quite complicated if you ask me. Perhaps others can shed some light on this subject.Let me reword this Chopper, so that maybe we can stay here with it. I believe that the "tribulation" that NT talks about in Matthew 24 and Revelation as well as Daniel, has already occurred - the destruction of the temple, end of temple sacrifice, judgment on Israel, on nations participating in the destruction of Israel and all of this occurred without a rapture. Jesus, however has not come yet. That is still in the future. But, He did judge Israel and the nations around Israel in 70 AD. That is His coming in the clouds. So the tribulation occurred without rapture and that is my stance. This is why it's so important to find out when Revelation was written, before 70 AD or around 95 AD. If it was written before 70 AD, then Revelation could be relevant to the destruction of the temple in 70 AD, not to the future (except 2nd coming of Jesus). If you look at Revelation it has many metaphors that were also used in Ezekiel, before the destruction of the temple in 586 BC. So Revelation scripture prophesies could be directed at the temple in 70 AD just as Ezekiel prophecies where for the temple in 586 BC. If Revelations was written in 95 AD, then I am wrong and I will have to look at this in a different way.