No, they’re not. You’re letting your personal views and feelings interpret Scripture.
Of course, but that is neither here nor there when it comes to proper theology on this matter.
Please stop with arguing to identity politics. It has nothing to do with anything.
And, yet, the Bible clearly teaches that all (edible) animals are given for food and that all such animals are to be considered clean.
I guess you missed my point. You are arguing from a religious perspective—your own. Scripture simply does not support your position which is legalism. I'm arguing from Scripture.
Anymore like that and you’ll be removed from this discussion.
It is very easy to overeat anything that tastes good. Everyone knows this; it happens all the time, often at Thanksgiving or Christmas or some other family get-together.
The issue is this: you first stated, "You're not sinless as long as you crave twinkies and chips."
To which
electedbyhim replied: "Craving twinkies and potato chips are a sin?
That's great stuff."
You responded: "No, it's not. It's a form of idolatry. You're seeking comfort and relief from these highly palatable junks with no or little nutritional value."
So, it seems that overeating is not relevant then, according to you, it's whether or not it has nutritional value that determines if it's idolatry. That seems very subjective.
This is relevant how?
I haven't ignored it at all. Anyone who has read my posts can clearly see that I have argued to that several times.
You stated: "You're not sinless as long as you crave twinkies and chips."
I responded, in part:
'At what point does processed food become "unsanctifiable"? How processed must it be? What is the objective criteria and where does the Bible support that criteria?
It there is no objective criteria, then it is entirely subjective, and points to your position not being truthful to Scripture.'
How does your response of "Every creature of God," actually address my questions?
Why not? Romans 14 is why not.
Rom 14:4 Who are you to pass judgment on the servant of another? It is before his own master that he stands or falls. And he will be upheld, for the Lord is able to make him stand. (ESV)
Again, you are going beyond Scripture into legalism.
Again, because it is actually sinful for you to tell others that what they're eating is sinful, based on your subjective opinion and not Scripture.
Rom 14:19 So then let us pursue what makes for peace and for mutual upbuilding. (ESV)
This is not what you're doing.
Rom 14:20 Do not, for the sake of food, destroy the work of God. Everything is indeed clean, but it is wrong for anyone to make another stumble by what he eats. (ESV)
This is what you are doing. You're confusing wisdom with morality. That is, it isn't wise to eat everything or at least not in moderation, but that doesn't mean it is morally wrong to eat or even crave those things.
I'm not, so please don't misrepresent my position as being such. As Christians we are supposed to be truthful to Scripture and Scripture plainly states that believers are not bound to follow the dietary guideline laid out in the Bible. Period.
Of course not. What an utterly silly and pointless question.
For the plain and obvious fact that something like porn and drugs are clearly against Scripture; they are moral issues. Social media and food are not moral issues.
No idea what your point is here. Your position doesn't have a verse to stand on.