Free from what? I wanna be free from the temptation of junk foods even at times when I'm hungry or depressed, do you?Want to be free ?
Join For His Glory for a discussion on how
https://christianforums.net/threads/a-vessel-of-honor.110278/
https://christianforums.net/threads/psalm-70-1-save-me-o-god-lord-help-me-now.108509/
Strengthening families through biblical principles.
Focus on the Family addresses the use of biblical principles in parenting and marriage to strengthen the family.
Read daily articles from Focus on the Family in the Marriage and Parenting Resources forum.
Free from what? I wanna be free from the temptation of junk foods even at times when I'm hungry or depressed, do you?Want to be free ?
Free from the Law.Free from what?
I'm already free from service to sin. (John 8:32-34)I wanna be free from the temptation of junk foods even at times when I'm hungry or depressed, do you?
Implying that it is a sin for someone to eat something that for you is a sin, is legalism. It could be you are weak in faith, but you are not to pass judgement on others by what they eat.You don't call it a sin only because it's offensive to you, as it is to most people, that's why sin is rarely preached from the pulpit. Feel free to enjoy the licentiousness which you mistake as "liberty in Christ", your own body will give you an honest response to such diet over time, for the wages of sin is death, not suddenly, but gradually - then suddenly.
Free from the Law.
Free from sin.
I don't believe you. It seems like you've been boasting.And isn't it God's promise that we will never be tempted above what we can handle ? (1 Cor 10:13)
I pass warning and concern, not judgement. God passes judgement in regard of unhealthy eating. Obesity is a legitimate concern that has even affected national security, since too many young people are considered "too fat to fight." Paul's point in Rom. 14 is a denouncement of identity politics built around diet, not the merit in one diet or lack thereof in another diet, consumption of certain food or abstinence from certain food doesn't make you unqiue from anybody else, it's just customes. Also, this passage is Paul's response to a certain conflict within the Roman church, it sets an example for future generations to settle similar conflicts, there's no need to be so dogmatic about it.Implying that it is a sin for someone to eat something that for you is a sin, is legalism. It could be you are weak in faith, but you are not to pass judgement on others by what they eat.
The quote is easy to find. (1 Cor 10:13)I don't believe you. It seems like you've been boasting.
So is this:The quote is easy to find. (1 Cor 10:13)
So is this..."For he hath made him to be sin for us, who knew no sin; that we might be made the righteousness of God in him." (2 Cor 5:21)So is this:
"My punishment is greater than I can bear!" (Gen. 4:13)
This--'Feel free to enjoy the licentiousness which you mistake as "liberty in Christ"'--is judgement.I pass warning and concern, not judgement. God passes judgement in regard of unhealthy eating.
Of course it is. Do you also pass judgement on those who don't exercise? Do you exercise? Do you know that VO2 max and grip strength are very strong predictors of all-cause mortality and healthspan?Obesity is a legitimate concern
Rom 14:1 As for the one who is weak in faith, welcome him, but not to quarrel over opinions.Paul's point in Rom. 14 is a denouncement of identity politics built around diet, not the merit in one diet or lack thereof in another diet, consumption of certain food or abstinence from certain food doesn't make you unqiue from anybody else, it's just customes.
Exactly. It means we are never to judge someone else for what they do or don't eat. Let them eat what they want; they answer to God.Also, this passage is Paul's response to a certain conflict within the Roman church, it sets an example for future generations to settle similar conflicts, there's no need to be so dogmatic about it.
That's the reality we're experiencing, the dominant state of mind in the Laodicean church. God passed that judgement, I just conveyed it.This--'Feel free to enjoy the licentiousness which you mistake as "liberty in Christ"'--is judgement.
Again, God is the judge of all. Within Christian circle, some believe body is the temple of the spirit, some believe it's merely a vessel, others a prison, and that will be reflected in how they handle their own body through exercise - or lack thereof.Of course it is. Do you also pass judgement on those who don't exercise? Do you exercise? Do you know that VO2 max and grip strength are very strong predictors of all-cause mortality and healthspan?
Because you've been pushing it while denying it. You insist that the kosher diet law separates Israel from the Canaanites as a unique identity group, I simply view it as a food safety regulation which is far advanced of its time. Drain the blood, trim the fat and ditch the offal are now all common practice in meat prepararion and packing.Sounds like "identity politics" to me--those who are weak in faith vs. those who are not. Of course, it has nothing to do with identity politics (not quite sure what your fascination is with that phrase),
Then why did Paul teach that not all are beneficial (1 Cor. 6:12-13), some food are offered to idols (1 Cor. 8:1-4), and don't partake in such foods with idolators (1 Cor. 10:20-21)? Doesn't sound like "eat whatever you want" to me.Exactly. It means we are never to judge someone else for what they do or don't eat. Let them eat what they want; they answer to God.
I personally know a few who don't eat junk food and are overweight. ..I pass warning and concern, not judgement. God passes judgement in regard of unhealthy eating. Obesity is a legitimate concern that has even affected national security, since too many young people are considered "too fat to fight." Paul's point in Rom. 14 is a denouncement of identity politics built around diet, not the merit in one diet or lack thereof in another diet, consumption of certain food or abstinence from certain food doesn't make you unqiue from anybody else, it's just customes. Also, this passage is Paul's response to a certain conflict within the Roman church, it sets an example for future generations to settle similar conflicts, there's no need to be so dogmatic about it.
Yet some Christians believe he sinned when he worked (healed) on the sabbath day. They also believe he sinned when he Proclaimed all animals clean, even though scripture said he knew NO sin.who knew no sin
I cannot agree that any Christians would accuse the Lord, who was the PERFECT LAMB of God, of sinning.Yet some Christians believe he sinned when he worked (healed) on the sabbath day. They also believe he sinned when he Proclaimed all animals clean, even though scripture said he knew NO sin
Of course it's not just junk food, there're other contributors such as low quality/quantity sleep, disordered eating - of any food, sedentary lifestyle and endocrine disruption. Some people, especially middle aged women in menopause and perimenopause, report weight gain even though there's no dramatic chage in their diet or exercise. Weight is not constant, it natually flactuates as the result of hormonal ebb and flow, and it's not the sole indicator of health.I personally know a few who don't eat junk food and are overweight. ..
Also military rations are ultra processed .
Military food in the chow all ain't much better .there's veterans joke on how the army set you up for obesity .
It's not far from the truth .
C rations had a life of decades as does mres.
I remember seeing m and m from 92 still in service inside the mre issued to me and other back in the early oughties
Also military rations are ultra processed .
Military food in the chow all ain't much better .there's veterans joke on how the army set you up for obesity .
Where does God say anything about licentiousness regarding food? You stated, "Feel free to enjoy the licentiousness which you mistake as "liberty in Christ".' You were implying that it is a sin for someone to eat something that you consider a sin to eat. In other words, you went directly against what Paul states in Romans 14, which means your judgement is not from God, it's from you.That's the reality we're experiencing, the dominant state of mind in the Laodicean church. God passed that judgement, I just conveyed it.
Then let him judge and stick to what the Bible says regarding food and drink.Again, God is the judge of all.
Pushing what, identity politics? You don't seem to understand that the Bible very much makes distinctions, very important distinctions, between false teachers and true teachers, false prophets and true prophets, those who believe a false gospel and those who believe the true gospel, those who are in the faith, those who are outside the faith, those who are weak in faith and those who are strong in faith.Because you've been pushing it while denying it.
It was to separate the people of Israel from the Canaanites as a unique identity group--the one and only chosen people of God.You insist that the kosher diet law separates Israel from the Canaanites as a unique identity group, I simply view it as a food safety regulation which is far advanced of its time.
Act 15:19 Therefore my judgment is that we should not trouble those of the Gentiles who turn to God,Drain the blood, trim the fat and ditch the offal are now all common practice in meat prepararion and packing.
This is descriptive, not prescriptive. It's about the believer using wisdom and sound judgement.Then why did Paul teach that not all are beneficial (1 Cor. 6:12-13),
You're moving the goalposts. We're talking about what is the nature and nutrition of food, not whether or not it has been offered to an idol. Also, don't take things out of context:some food are offered to idols (1 Cor. 8:1-4),
Again, you're moving the goalposts. This is not a context we are discussion.and don't partake in such foods with idolators (1 Cor. 10:20-21)? Doesn't sound like "eat whatever you want" to me.
"Do not desire his delicacies, For they are deceptive food." (Prov. 23:3)Where does God say anything about licentiousness regarding food?