I don’t. Why do you suggest that I do? But there you go again. You’re methods are obvious and illogical. Why would I need to take away anything from these verses.
Your fellow anti-OSAS buddy just acknowledged that right there in the text/message to Smyrna we have Jesus saying “
those who call themselves Jews and are not, but are a synagogue of Satan” (i.e.
Those are unsaved people). They don't have ears to hear. I don't see your point.
Yet he ignored the second question because of its obvious implications:
So, I’ll ask you and see if you’ll answer:
1. Are there there unsaved people in Smyrna?
Do not be afraid of the things which you are about to suffer. Behold, the devil is about to throw some of you into prison so that you may be tested, and you will experience affliction ten days.
2. Why just some and not all? Ah, never mind, I’ll just answer it myself.
1. Yes. They get the harm of the second death.
2. Some there got tested in prison, some did not. Some were rich (saved), some were “
a synagogue of Satan” (un-saved).
A domino that you never acknowledge and always want to make these passages (and others) out to exclusively be about saved people loosing there salvation. They are not all saved people in Smyrna (or in any other church for that matter).
So when I read:
11 The one who has an ear, let him hear what the Spirit says to the churches. The one who conquers will never be harmed by the second death.’
I first understand that there are some in Smyrna that are not saved. Which is way Jesus says “
The one who has an ear” and not all. He just got through saying there are unsaved people there.
As for “second death”. It is obviously implying the Lake of Fire for those who are “
a synagogue of Satan”.
Yet “
the One” who is rich (i.e. saved) will “
never be harmed” , merely tested/imprisoned.
I have zero problem believing God’s prophesying to the saved people there (“
the ones who have an ear to hear the Spirit”) that they “
will never be harmed by the second death”. Have you thought this through though? What’s up with that? Jesus prophesying such futures for those that have an ear to hear the Spirit and are about to be sent to prison for claiming they do? What happens to Jesus’ prophesy if they lost their salvation/faith? How could Jesus know what would happen to them and be telling them they will not be harmed. yet you say it’s possible that some (even all I suppose) could lose their salvation. That makes no sense to me.
I’m not quite sure how your position could agree with Jesus' prophesy such as that, given your view. What if they were all like your friend?
Rather than telling me what I’ve not said and telling me what OSAS is requiring you to tell your friend, answer that.
Anyway, other than your false accusation that I “take away the part about the second death” in this passage, you’ve really not made any case here to begin with. Can you make a case for how this passage proves anti-OSAS, without first falsely assuming that all people in Smyrna are saved? I honestly have no idea what your point is with Rev 2:12-17.