Or my interpretation is entirely consistent with 1 Peter 5 and James (Both writing to the 12 Tribes in dispersion undergoing various trials.
1 Peter 5:4
And when the chief Shepherd appears, you will receive the unfading crown of glory
James 1:12
Blessed is the person who endures testing, because when he is approved he will receive the crown of life that he has promised to those who love him.
Are you trying to tell me that you think James meant that saved people that do not even receive testing (much less endure it kind of like American Saved people) are unsaved even though he calls them brothers? Rather, James understands that there are mature Christians and there are those that need more maturing.
James 1:12 Blessed is the person who endures testing, because when he is approved he will receive the crown of life that he has promised to those who love him.
2 Consider it all joy, my brothers, whenever you encounter various trials, 3 because you know that the testing of your faith produces endurance. 4 And let endurance have its perfect effect, so that you may be mature and complete, lacking in nothing.
you are distressed by various trials, 7 so that the genuineness of your faith, more valuable than gold that is passing away, but is tested by fire, may be found to result in praise and glory and honor (i.e. crownn of glory) at the revelation of Jesus Christ
Peter said "crown of glory" yet James choose to say "crown of life", yet neither said "eternal life" as Jesus does when speaking of salvation.
Those phrases were spoken to saved elders that lead properly yet did not necessarily face the trail of death.
And Jesus said "crown of life" to the saved church members (that already had "eternal life) there that overcame their testing "fear
of death". Eternal life plus a crown to go with it because of their passing their test of death and maturing toward perfection. My view is perfectly consistent with 1 Peter 5, James 1 and Rev 2. Eternal life is a reward in and of itself. If you wanted to communicate even more reward to a few specific people in Smyrna facing death receiving a "crown of life" is perfectly reasonable. Or, on the other hand, if you want to communicate extra reward to church elders facing poverty in dispersion because of the Gospel, how better to say it than "crown of glory". Nothing inconsistent about it.
First, I am
now trying to define 'crown of life' the same way I always have defined it, without regard to OSAS one way or the other. I couldn't care less if OSAS were true or not. Other than I think it's the consistent message of Scripture(s) (all of them). Just because I am NOW defining it that way (which I am) DOES NOT imply that I once defined it any other way. Logically speaking.
Second, Exactly how is my definition of "crown of life" inconsistent with Peter's "crown of glory"? My definition is very inconsistent with your view that they both mean "eternal life", sure. But my definition is not inconsistent with 1 Peter 5 or James 1 or Rev 2. In fact, it's entirely consistent with them all. Have you thought this (your argument) through? That Rev 2's "Crown of Life" does not mean a crown/reward as 1 Peter's "Crown of Glory" does because they are not technically the exact same phrase (even though they both obviously are talking about crowns)? If your argument is valid, what does that do to the fact that neither phrase are the exact same phrase as "eternal life" or better yet "salvation"? Inconsistency is a sign of error. I consistently think a crown is just that, a crown. And saved is just that, saved. Now, where does the Bible uses the term unsaved? It doesn't. It's consistently absent. Yes, I know you assume "unsaved" is what is meant in all kinds of texts. But I mean where does the Bible use the exact word "unsaved"? Never!