Join For His Glory for a discussion on how
https://christianforums.net/threads/a-vessel-of-honor.110278/
https://christianforums.net/threads/psalm-70-1-save-me-o-god-lord-help-me-now.108509/
Read through the following study by Tenchi for more on this topic
https://christianforums.net/threads/without-the-holy-spirit-we-can-do-nothing.109419/
Join Sola Scriptura for a discussion on the subject
https://christianforums.net/threads/anointed-preaching-teaching.109331/#post-1912042
Strengthening families through biblical principles.
Focus on the Family addresses the use of biblical principles in parenting and marriage to strengthen the family.
Read daily articles from Focus on the Family in the Marriage and Parenting Resources forum.
Because both Thessalonians and Revelation were written before 70 AD, while the Temple still stood, these passages you claim that are of a future temple actually refer to the one that was destroyed in 70 AD!!!
You are not giving importance to the verses quoted by JLB or you are purposefully avoiding to answer.
The temple was "destroyed" in 70 AD and no abomination was ever recorded. You are purposefully ignoring "he sits as God in the temple of God". No one sat as God in the temple of God when the temple was getting destroyed in 70 AD. Neither was Jerusalem tread underfoot for 42 months. This is why you are making Paul and John a liar.
Please don't try to answer the questions there were not asked or replied.
And now the Romans, upon the flight of the seditious into the city, and upon the burning of the holy house itself, and of all the buildings round about it, brought their ensigns to the temple and set them over against its eastern gate; and there did they offer sacrifices to them, and there did they make Titus imperator with the greatest acclamations of joy.
Flavius Josephus, The Works of Flavius Josephus, trans. William Whiston (Hartford, CN: S. S. Scranton, 1905), WORDsearch CROSS e-book, 849.
Roman soldiers offering pagan sacrifices to the graven images that comprised their ensigns on the desolated Holy ground of Mount Zion.
Nope. No abomination ever recorded in history. Nothing to see here. Move along.
But the number of calamities which then overwhelmed the whole nation; the extreme misery to which particularly the inhabitants of Judea were reduced, the vast numbers of men, with women and children that fell by the sword and famine, and innumerable other forms of death; the numerous and great cities of Judea that were besieged, as also the great and incredible distresses that those experienced who took refuge at Jerusalem, as to a place of perfect security; these facts, as well as the whole tenor of the war, and each particular of its progress, when finally, the abomination of desolation, according to the prophetic declaration, stood in the very temple of God, so celebrated of old, but which now was approaching its total down-fall and final destruction by fire; all this, I say, any one that wishes may see accurately stated in the history written by Josephus.
Eusebius Pamphilus, The Ecclesiastical History of Eusebius Pamphilus, WORDsearch CROSS e-book, 85-87.
Read Josephus' Wars of the Jews to understand how Christ's prophecies were all fulfilled before that generation had passed.
The problem in trying to understand that phrase "abomination of desolation" (which Luke defines for us, by the way) is not that there is a single abomination in the Temple back then, but dozens within the writings of Josephus alone!
But what does Josephus know? He only wrote as an eyewitness to the events that fulfilled Christ's prophecies to a "T".
The Romans entered the temple they destroyed it the exposed the Holy of Holies.. By being unclean and entering the temple it was abomination. before even getting to the Holy of Holies.
When did God 'sit' in the temple?
What is meant by sit?
His presence at times was in the Holy of Holies hovering the Mercy seat.
When the death of Christ split the veil the Holy of Holies was opened ...man did not open that area God did.... there will be no true Holy of Holies no matter how many buildings man builds.... any peoples can build a building they can put a sign over the door calling it 'The Temple' but that does not make it so. Christ is The Temple....
The temple system was destroyed 70 ad . God had the Romans destroy it. The Jewish leaders used the Romans to carry out Gods plan of the sacrifice of Christ...
70 AD God used the same Romans to end their way of life.
You just proved the events in 70 AD doesn't match the abomination in the prophecy.
Who was the man who sat as God on the temple of God? It simply didn't happen. For this to happen, the temple must exist for that person to sit as God in it and the event must have happened before 70AD, but nothing happened as mentioned in the prophecy.
This article substantiates what I wrote about John of Gischala.
http://www.preteristarchive.com/Modern/2002_noe_man-of-sin.html
Here's an excerpt:
Josephus also records that before this John of Gischala, the son of Levi, was established as the Zealot leader in control of the Temple area (there were three Zealot factions), the power of Satan was already doing his deceitful and treacherous work. This John physically entered the Temple, presented himself to the Zealots as a God-sent ambassador; and persuaded them to defy the laws of Rome and go to war to gain independence. He also instigated the calling in the Idumaeans to keep the Jewish sympathizers from submitting to Rome. He ordered the death of Ananus and the removal of the priesthood. After these atrocities, he became the official leader of the Zealot group m control of theTemple area-john held the temple" and began disregarded the laws of Rome, God, and man, and promising deliverance from the Romans. Then he broke off from the Zealots and began "setting up a monarchial power." He "set on fire these houses that were full of corn, and of all other provision which would have been sufficient for a siege of many years" He deceived the Jews about the power of the Roman armies In possession of the Temple and the adjoining parts, he cut the throats of anyone suspected of going over to the Romans.13 He performed many sacrileges, such as melting down the sacred utensils used in Temple service, and defiled the Temple.
In short, this John established himself in the Temple, the one standing when Paul wrote, and put himself above Rome and above God, thereby taking the place of God in the Temple. All this happened, right then and there, and exactly as Paul had said the "man of sin" would do.
After the coming of the Lord and the destruction of Jerusalem and the Temple in A.D. 70, John of Gischala was "condemned to perpetual imprisonment" by the Roman authorities. Thus was fulfilled Paul's prophetic and symbolic language that this man would be destroyed by "the spirit of his Jesus mouth and brightness of his [parousia] coming" (see Isa. 11:4; 30:27-33; Hos. 6:5; also Da. 7:8, 19-28).
Verses 11-12. "For this reason God sends them a powerful delusion so that they will believe the lie and so that all will be condemned who have not believed the truth but delighted In wickedness." Josephus records that the Roman General Titus had no intention of destroying the Temple. The Romans wanted to preserve it as a trophy and monument of their conquest. Even Josephus personally pleaded with John of Gischala to surrender. But such a "madness" swept through him and his Jewish followers that they taunted the powers of Rome and refused to listen. This man, John, through the power of Satan and the delusion sent by God upon the Jewish people, forced the Roman armies to act. Instead of accepting Jesus as Messiah, King, and Deliverer, the unbelieving Jews placed their hopes in this false messiah a man of deceit and wickedness. They looked to the "man of sin" to lead them to victory and independence. The priesthood, which stood in their way, had been removed. And by August or September of A.D. 70, Paul's entire "man of sin" prophecy of 2nd Thessalonians 2:1-12 was fulfilled. The city and the Temple were burned and destroyed. The covenant nation of Israel and biblical Judaism were forever destroyed.
When the death of Christ split the veil the Holy of Holies was opened ...man did not open that area God did.... there will be no true Holy of Holies no matter how many buildings man builds.... any peoples can build a building they can put a sign over the door calling it 'The Temple' but that does not make it so. Christ is The Temple....
The temple system was destroyed 70 ad . God had the Romans destroy it. The Jewish leaders used the Romans to carry out Gods plan of the sacrifice of Christ...
70 AD God used the same Romans to end their way of life.
The man of sin the son of perdition will be alive when The Lord Jesus physically returns.
If temple system is destroyed, why are the saints serving him day and night in His temple?
(Rev 7:15) "Therefore they are before the throne of God, and serve Him day and night in His temple. And He who sits on the throne will dwell among them.
When was the last time you had a Levite priest kill a lamb for ya?If temple system is destroyed, why are the saints serving him day and night in His temple?
(Rev 7:15) "Therefore they are before the throne of God, and serve Him day and night in His temple. And He who sits on the throne will dwell among them.
yupThe veil torn symbolizes, no more there is a veil between God and man and Christ becomes our mediator and removed the veil at cross.
it was destroyed at the end of "this" generation that Jesus was talking about.Just to note, God torn only the veil in the temple when Christ was at cross, not the temple itself is destroyed at that time.
So Christ the Lamb of God needs to offer a blood sacrifice? Are you really suggesting his death was not the finial Blood sacrifice.? Please tell me i am not understanding...While we are not under the law - Gal 5:18, Christ is born under the law as in Gal 4:4. Every single law we try to say through grace is not valid for Christ for Christ Himself is not under any grace which is from Himself, but law given by His Father and He fulfills every law. But it is through Him who is under the law, we have grace and redeemed us from the curse of the law.
Hence, temple system is not valid for us, but valid for Christ for He is still under the law and must fulfill all law to it's very detail.
You still haven't addressed 2Thess 2:3-5.
Yes. And this was fulfilled when Christ came in judgment upon Jerusalem in 70 AD.
Yes. And this was fulfilled when Christ came in judgment upon Jerusalem in 70 AD.