Dorothy Mae
Member
But qas many as received Him, to them He gave the 5right to become children of God, to those who believe in His name: 13 rwho were born, not of blood, nor of the will of the flesh, nor of the will of man, but of God.miamited
Re: John 1:12-13 Interesting answer. That is a possibility I suppose. You didn't address the other part of the verses saying man is not saved by the will of man. How does that fit in your 'free will' theology that says it up to man's will to decide regarding salvation.
Not "as many as were born of God" but as many as received him. They had to choose to receive him. This part of the verse you continually ignore.
Why kind of a God do you think He is? One chance and that is it, buster? The God of Calvinism, as wondering has said, is pretty unkind and cruel. God calls and calls and calls. He is long-suffering. (Do you need a scripture for that character quality?)Wow .... I think you are going way out on a limb with that explanation. Again, kudos for directly answering questions.
Hmmm, I wonder if someone that hears the gospel incorrectly preached will have a second chance such that Christ comes to them and explains things rightly and they accept Him. I don't think so, but gets my vote as does universalism. ... not a democracy, but that's my vote.
That definition is pretty much hedonism...following the lusts of whatever.Oh, I can define FREE WILL ... the ability to choose according to your greatest desire (at the time). Where our desires are determined by God.
But, to understand your position you would have to state your definition. I can't impose my definition upon you.
It was not for that reason per se and what is more, he explained the parables to his followers. They understood them. But the parables are not a friend of the Reformed thinkers, I grant you. God is never doing anything in those parables that support Reformed theology. I mean the parable of the different soils lays the blame square on the soil receiving the truth. That is not at all what you want to read.Empirical evidence shows we don't understand. Jesus himself said something like the reason He gave them was to hinder their understanding ... at any rate, parables/analogies are more susceptible to abuse than plain statements.