Christian Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Old Testament Genocide

This is to both Deavonreye and Alabaster-----------
.......... You cannot, as the created, presume to judge your creator according to your own feeble standards.[/B]

It is ridonculous.

Your getting close here. Your opponent, Devonreye cannot understand the nature of man, and therefore can never agree with you. His presupposition, or his starting point is the innocence of man. If you think in terms of his presupposition, that man is innocent, then Deavonreye is right, why should man (being innocent) be judged? What did man do wrong? Look at all those innocent little babies that died because God judged a culture. Did they do anything wrong? If man is innocent, then certainly God is the unjust cruel judge.

The answer is that yes, the babies are evil, and should be judged by God. The entire human race is evil, and if God destroyed the entire Human Race, he would still be just.

Alabaster, what I am saying is a problem for your theology.... right? You would be the more middle position that man is morally neutral until man chooses. You do not see man as a sinner, who is sinful from the moment of his conception. You see man as more neutral, maybe leaning a little to the evil side. You would see sin nature as a sickness that means "no body is perfect." You would admit faults in man, but not go to the extent that I would and say that man is only evil.
Genesis 6:5 And Jehovah saw that the wickedness of man was great in the earth, and that every imagination of the thoughts of his heart was only evil continually.
Of course I think you are close, in that you know man has sinned sins, but you do not see man as a rebel from the moment of conception and being conceived in sin. I think this weakens your argument against Deavonreye. With your presuppositions (Alabaster), maybe there should be some times God should not have judged people. Do not you picture God as one who sits and waits and hopes that maybe someone will repent?

It does not in the least amaze me that God had little babies killed. It is far more remarkable that God did not kill every man, woman, child, infant in the whole human race. It is far more remarkable that anyone is left alive. I say this because I believe we are born in iniquity. The moment we were conceived, we were evil. As David says below in Psalm 51, we were concieved in sin. In this he is not speaking of the sin of his mother, or of his Father Jesse. He is speaking of his own nature. Most scholars think David penned Pslam 51 right after his sin with Bathsheba, and his murder of her husband. I think David saw how wicked he really was. David says is PSalm 51...
3 For I know my transgressions; And my sin is ever before me.

David reflects upon his sin and is able to see his own nature. Of his own nature, he says...
Psalm 51:5 Behold, I was brought forth in iniquity; And in sin did my mother conceive me.

So then, Deavonreye sees man as very innocent, and that maybe God could judge a few men like Hitler, but Deavonreye would proclaim that he himself is good enough to not be judged. Alabaster sees himself as having faults and that he has made mistakes and he knows that he should be judged. Alabaster sees everyone as having some guilt (although, infants are an issue in his theology). Me, Mondar the Calvinist! I of course see man as an evil being, totally incapable of pleasing God in any way. If God destroys the entire race... if he kills ever man, woman, child, infant.... we are only getting what we deserve. The fact that any left alive is grace (common grace). I see the human race as born dead. The race became still born at Adams fall. We are all dead from the moment of our conception. God does not leave us all dead (but that would be justice) but he makes some of us alive. Oh the matchless grace of God! We were dead, and he made us alive!
Eph 2:1 And you did he make alive, when ye were dead through your trespasses and sins,
5 even when we were dead through our trespasses, made us alive together with Christ (by grace have ye been saved),
Only in the Calvinistic theology of total depravity can there be a holy God who is not guilty for judging infants. We are all evil, we are all guilty, we were all in Adam.

Romans 5:12 Therefore, as through one man sin entered into the world, and death through sin; and so death passed unto all men, for that all sinned:--

18 So then as through one trespass the judgment came unto all men to condemnation...........

Judgment comes to all men according to the scripture, and justly so. All men are in Adam. Righteousness comes to all men in Christ.

Alabaster, Christ is the only way to be accepted before God, and not be judged. In that we agree. But I see God as saving us from much more then you do. You see man as running the race and falling short. We did not fall short, but we were running back the track the wrong way because we hated God. God changed our nature so that we could believe, and God saved us.

Deavonreye, the worse part of your atheism is your self-righteousness. For that and that alone you will stand guilty before God.

To any other reader, if you begin with the fact that all men are in Adams rebellion, and we are sinners who rebel against God from the moment of our conception, then if God extinguishes the entire human race, he is not guilty. If he commits genocide, then he has done justice, but shown grace to those left of the human race he did not kill. We are an evil race. If God does not kill us, we will kill ourselves.
 
Wow, . . . . so not wanting to see thousands of dead babies [at the hands of god led Hebrews] is a "feeble standard".

Yes it is a feeble human comprehension. Know God through His beautiful Son, Jesus, and learn His ways, and you will develop an understanding of who He is and accept His ways.

And in case you haven't noticed, YOUR mind is human as well. If you can't fathom this god, then how do you really know it enough TO love or worhip it?
I have the mind of Christ. We who know God, trust Him because He proves Himself over and over to be good and faithful---always.

1 Corinthians 2:16
For,
“Who can know the Lord’s thoughts?
Who knows enough to teach him?”

But we understand these things, for we have the mind of Christ.


Sure, I am unable to judge someone with more power than me, . . . but the multi-genocide of a flood, which was a failure at removing sin from the world, isn't something I would call as a "higher standard".

Of course, that is if that global flood was literal, which it wasn't.
It was no failure, It was a judgment made by the Most High God..
 
Mondar, I do not see people as "innocent", not like you think of it. People can be cold hearted, nasty, immoral, . . . . but neither are they so wicked that they deserve eternal torment because of it.

Alabaster, the "flood" wasn't successful if it was done "because men were evil". It just seems vandictive, especially when not long after, people were no different.

Regardless, it is just a story anyway.
 
This is to both Deavonreye and Alabaster-----------


Your getting close here. Your opponent, Devonreye cannot understand the nature of man, and therefore can never agree with you. His presupposition, or his starting point is the innocence of man. If you think in terms of his presupposition, that man is innocent, then Deavonreye is right, why should man (being innocent) be judged? What did man do wrong? Look at all those innocent little babies that died because God judged a culture. Did they do anything wrong? If man is innocent, then certainly God is the unjust cruel judge.

The answer is that yes, the babies are evil, and should be judged by God. The entire human race is evil, and if God destroyed the entire Human Race, he would still be just.

Alabaster, what I am saying is a problem for your theology.... right? You would be the more middle position that man is morally neutral until man chooses. You do not see man as a sinner, who is sinful from the moment of his conception. You see man as more neutral, maybe leaning a little to the evil side. You would see sin nature as a sickness that means "no body is perfect." You would admit faults in man, but not go to the extent that I would and say that man is only evil.
Genesis 6:5 And Jehovah saw that the wickedness of man was great in the earth, and that every imagination of the thoughts of his heart was only evil continually.
Of course I think you are close, in that you know man has sinned sins, but you do not see man as a rebel from the moment of conception and being conceived in sin. I think this weakens your argument against Deavonreye. With your presuppositions (Alabaster), maybe there should be some times God should not have judged people. Do not you picture God as one who sits and waits and hopes that maybe someone will repent?

No, I actually agree with you. We are ALL are born evil compared to holy God.

I don't understand how you can gather my 'presuppositions' without you being presumptuous. Please don't speak for me...it just gets my back up.


Alabaster, Christ is the only way to be accepted before God, and not be judged. In that we agree. But I see God as saving us from much more then you do. You see man as running the race and falling short. We did not fall short, but we were running back the track the wrong way because we hated God. God changed our nature so that we could believe, and God saved us.

I don't see how you know what I think! I agree with you.

To any other reader, if you begin with the fact that all men are in Adams rebellion, and we are sinners who rebel against God from the moment of our conception, then if God extinguishes the entire human race, he is not guilty. If he commits genocide, then he has done justice, but shown grace to those left of the human race he did not kill. We are an evil race. If God does not kill us, we will kill ourselves.
Yep.
 
There is no "rebellion" until the actual god presents him/herself to us for us to actually decide. Words in an ancient book is insufficient.
 
Mondar, I do not see people as "innocent", not like you think of it. People can be cold hearted, nasty, immoral, . . . . but neither are they so wicked that they deserve eternal torment because of it.

Everyone is born heading for hell, our default destiny. You are rationalizing wickedness. will you stand before holy God and say, "I wasn't THAT bad!"??? who are you to decide what is wicked and what isn't that a person doesn't deserve eternal punishment?

Good thing it's God's decision.

Alabaster, the "flood" wasn't successful if it was done "because men were evil". It just seems vandictive, especially when not long after, people were no different.

Regardless, it is just a story anyway.
No, it is a true event, and it was necessary in God's eyes. His view is the only valid view.
 
The Psalmist could say,

'In sin did my mother conceive me.' (Psalm 51.5)

The wonder is, that the Father could ever send His Son, the Savior, into such a sin-stricken world.

Amen. The wonder is that He loves us that much.
 
Mondar, I do not see people as "innocent", not like you think of it. People can be cold hearted, nasty, immoral, . . . . but neither are they so wicked that they deserve eternal torment because of it.

Alabaster, the "flood" wasn't successful if it was done "because men were evil". It just seems vandictive, especially when not long after, people were no different.

Regardless, it is just a story anyway.

Deavonreye, it seems to me you play with words in your reply to me. I am aware you thing some people do some bad things. However, even in your statement that men are not so "wicked that they deserve eternal torment" you still paint a picture of a race of men who have a few who went astray, but some that are good, nobel, and innocent. What then is the base and natural nature of men? The moral nature of man is then naturally innocent, its just that some do a few bad things.

I think if eery there was a righteous ruler, it was King David. You think you would never take another mans life if you had that despotic power? You would never take another mans wife? I think how little you know how much power corrupts, and absolute power corrupts absolutely.


am aware that you think "some" people do not behave as they should. As I mentioned, I am sure you would say Hitler deserves to be punished.

Certainly there is a great gulf between you and me on the nature of man. I would not say Hitler behaved bad, I would say he was evil, and that same evil dwells in all men. God restrains that evil in many men, but we are all evil. It is our nature. Maybe all do not murder, rape, and pillage, but we all might say that nasty word, turn that hardened heart to those in need. When we walk away from those in need, we are certainly not righteous.

While you might see men as doing bad things, you do not see that it comes from an evil nature in man.
 
No, I actually agree with you. We are ALL are born evil compared to holy God.

I don't understand how you can gather my 'presuppositions' without you being presumptuous. Please don't speak for me...it just gets my back up.




I don't see how you know what I think! I agree with you.

Yep.

Alabaster, I could be mistaken, but I have read you in other threads. Do you not believe that natural, unregenerate man man has the ability to please God by his faith? If we can do something pleasing to God (like come up with faith on our own) must we not at least view the nature of man as only sick, or bent toward sin and not dead in sin? How can one dead in sin, do anything pleasing to God?
Romans 8:8 and they that are in the flesh cannot please God.
How can the natural man believe if he cannot receive the things of the Spirit of God?
1 Cor 2:14 Now the natural man receiveth not the things of the Spirit of God: for they are foolishness unto him; and he cannot know them, because they are spiritually judged.
If we can please God with faith when unregenerate, why not please God in other things?

While I know we agree in much... we agree that the grace of God is neccessary for salvation, but I dont see how you believe that the Grace of God is sufficient in and of itself. I am a monergist, you are a synergist. Have I read you wrong? I know I pigeon hole people and their theology as I read, and I make mistakes, but I don't remember you as one who believes the God is completely sovereign over his own salvation. Do you not believe in the free will of man? I would identify that as a doctrine in which you take a lesser view of the sin nature of man. Again, we agree in much, but I dont think we see eye to eye on the nature of man. This will affect your view of how do deal with Devonreye. As he raises the issue of God destroying infants in OT genocide, you will be slower to say that those infants were born as rebels in the human race and are worthy of destruction (as we all were). I think you did agree with that concept, but then you are sliding over to a point of view that is actually foreign to the concept of free will. If men are born with free will, then should not God withhold judgment until he sees the infant make a decision? Alabaster, I am glad that you believe in the grace of God in the sacrifice of Christ. But I don't think we are really in the same place on the nature of man? Right?
 
Everyone is born heading for hell, our default destiny. You are rationalizing wickedness. will you stand before holy God and say, "I wasn't THAT bad!"??? who are you to decide what is wicked and what isn't that a person doesn't deserve eternal punishment?
Good thing it's God's decision.


It isn't a matter of "how wicked is wicked". It is a matter of how unethical eternal punishment is for finite "crime". So yes, I wasn't bad enough for everlasting torture. Imagine how a flawed human can have more care about humans than god.

No, it is a true event, and it was necessary in God's eyes. His view is the only valid view.[/QUOTE]

No, it really wasn't. History proves that.
 
I think if eery there was a righteous ruler, it was King David. You think you would never take another mans life if you had that despotic power? You would never take another mans wife? I think how little you know how much power corrupts, and absolute power corrupts absolutely.

No, if I had been in King David's shoes, I wouldn't have killed someone or stole a man's wife. I'm sorry that you think I would. And, in my opinion, there IS no "absolute power".

Certainly there is a great gulf between you and me on the nature of man. I would not say Hitler behaved bad, I would say he was evil, and that same evil dwells in all men. God restrains that evil in many men, but we are all evil. It is our nature. Maybe all do not murder, rape, and pillage, but we all might say that nasty word, turn that hardened heart to those in need. When we walk away from those in need, we are certainly not righteous.

While you might see men as doing bad things, you do not see that it comes from an evil nature in man.

Last time I checked, there are all kinds of "those in need" that could be helped by . . . . supernatural means. They aren't. It is left up to faulty humans who are required to come up with the money, logistics, planning, executing, just to help a fraction. That's all I think of when I hear about the "hardened heart of man". Take that as you will.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
No, if I had been in King David's shoes, I wouldn't have killed someone or stole a man's wife. I'm sorry that you think I would. And, in my opinion, there IS no "absolute power".

Never say never, if you have never had such power. Power can corrupt anyone...even you.



Last time I checked, there are all kinds of "those in need" that could be helped by . . . . supernatural means. They aren't. It is left up to faulty humans who are required to come up with the money, logistics, planning, executing, just to help a fraction. That's all I think of when I hear about the "hardened heart of man". Take that as you will.

You posted a quote you erroneously attribute to me. Please change it.
 
Alabaster, I could be mistaken, but I have read you in other threads. Do you not believe that natural, unregenerate man man has the ability to please God by his faith? If we can do something pleasing to God (like come up with faith on our own) must we not at least view the nature of man as only sick, or bent toward sin and not dead in sin? How can one dead in sin, do anything pleasing to God?

Where is it scriptural that we can 'come up with faith on our own'????

You completely presume way too much about what I believe and probably mistake me for someone else.



While I know we agree in much... we agree that the grace of God is neccessary for salvation, but I dont see how you believe that the Grace of God is sufficient in and of itself. I am a monergist, you are a synergist. Have I read you wrong? I know I pigeon hole people and their theology as I read, and I make mistakes, but I don't remember you as one who believes the God is completely sovereign over his own salvation. Do you not believe in the free will of man? I would identify that as a doctrine in which you take a lesser view of the sin nature of man. Again, we agree in much, but I dont think we see eye to eye on the nature of man. This will affect your view of how do deal with Devonreye. As he raises the issue of God destroying infants in OT genocide, you will be slower to say that those infants were born as rebels in the human race and are worthy of destruction (as we all were). I think you did agree with that concept, but then you are sliding over to a point of view that is actually foreign to the concept of free will. If men are born with free will, then should not God withhold judgment until he sees the infant make a decision? Alabaster, I am glad that you believe in the grace of God in the sacrifice of Christ. But I don't think we are really in the same place on the nature of man? Right?

Yeah, you pigeon-hole people and must take the heat for slotting people in error. It is not your gift.
 
Never say never, if you have never had such power. Power can corrupt anyone...even you.

It’s not power that corrupts people; it is because people by nature are corrupt. God has absolute power and He is not corrupt, and neither will we when we have absolute power when we are in glory.
 
It’s not power that corrupts people; it is because people by nature are corrupt. God has absolute power and He is not corrupt, and neither will we when we have absolute power when we are in glory.

Yes, power will corrupt many people. That is why many don't have it. We can see from history how power corrupts. Mostly these people are sinners from the beginning and don't need much to tip the scales of corruption anyway.
 
Yes, power will corrupt many people. That is why many don't have it. We can see from history how power corrupts. Mostly these people are sinners from the beginning and don't need much to tip the scales of corruption anyway.

But the fault is not in power but in our natural nature. And we all have power whether we know it or not.....as long as you are a human being you have power. God made man (man = human being) to have power and authority…….He said, let them have dominion over the Earth.

But one of the problems are is that human beings seek to have dominion over other human beings, which God never said we should do....that came about because Adam and Eve sinned. The Bible clearly tells us that we who overcome will rule over all things. So the thing is in order for man to use power for good, we need the divine Nature of God.....human nature must and will be removed and replaced with the divine Nature of God.
 
Where is it scriptural that we can 'come up with faith on our own'????

There are several scriptures that directly state we cannot come up with faith on our own. John 6 repeats the concept twice.

(ASV)
Joh 6:44 No man can come to me, except the Father that sent me draw him: and I will raise him up in the last day.
Joh 6:65 And he said, For this cause have I said unto you, that no man can come unto me, except it be given unto him of the Father.


In both of the above passages, the word "can" is dunamai in greek. The term refers to "ability." No man has the ability to come to Christ.

Even if we had the natural ability to believe, we would not have the ability to receive the things of the Spirit of God.
1Co 2:14 Now the natural man receiveth not the things of the Spirit of God: for they are foolishness unto him; and he cannot know them, because they are spiritually judged.

When I made reference to Psalm 51, and all mankind being conceived in iniquity, that was a reference to original sin (Adams sin). Because we are all "in Adam" at conception and birth, we have no capacity for obedience or faith. We have the "free will" to choose any path of rebellion that we prefer, but we have no capacity for obedience and faith. The entire Human race lost the capacity to believe at the fall of Adam. We regain the capacity to believe after regeneration and the drawing of God.

We are not sovereign over the ministries of God I am calling "regeneration" and "drawing." God, in eternity past (Eph 1:4), chose those whom he would regenerate and draw. Without these ministries of the Holy Spirit and God that come upon those he has chosen, we would all be rebels. There is none of us that seek after God.
Rom 3:11 There is none that understandeth, There is none that seeketh after God; We were all rebelling and fleeing from God. The new birth does not come by an act of our will.... but the will of God.
Joh 1:13 who were born, not of blood, nor of the will of the flesh, nor of the will of man, but of God.

Alabaster, while we agree on much, we both trust in Christs substitutionary atonement for our justificaton before God.... But if I remember right, you claim that man should get the credit for his own faith. That is not a small difference. It will affect the way we do evangelism, and the way we do apologetics. However, I have noticed also that you are willing to side with me that man was conceived in sin. We are rebels from the time of our conception in our mothers womb. The difference is that when I say that, I am saying that man is so evil, that without the work of God, man does not have the capacity to believe. So then, I see man as more sinful and evil then you do.

I have always liked what John Piper said.... "I not only do bad things, I am bad." I think it summarizes the differences. You are aware that we do bad things, I believe that men do bad things, because they are bad by nature.
YouTube - John Piper is Bad - the video
 
Back
Top