Beetow
Member
- Dec 14, 2024
- 637
- 53
- Thread starter
- #121
.
FAQ: Are animals considered unbelievers? And if so, will they go to Hell?
REPLY: Neither aqua life, winged life, nor terra life were created in the image and
likeness of God; only mankind has that distinction. And whereas we are told man
has a conscience and a sense of responsibility, we are not told the same about the
Earth's lower forms of life so I think it safe to assume the animal kingdom is
amoral; which can be defined as having or showing no concern about whether one's
behavior is morally right or wrong.
The image and likeness of God also implies a sense of justice, i.e. an inclination to
honor good by penalizing evil.
FAQ: According to Gen 9:5, animals that kill people have to be put down. Doesn't
that imply they can be charged with murder?
REPLY: Well; one can scarcely prosecute an animal for murder when the animal is
incapable of understanding what murder is. But it goes further than that:
In the beginning God said: Let us make man in our image, after our likeness: and
let them have dominion over the fish of the sea, and over the fowl of the air, and
over the cattle, and over all the earth, and over every creeping thing that creepeth
upon the earth.
It is incumbent upon man to protect the dignity of his image and likeness of God
and if that means putting an animal down to do so, then he must or he will
regarding his image and likeness of God as something no more special than the
image and likeness of a lobster or a meerkat.
All in all, I think we have to concede that animal life was, and is, meant to be
expendable; whereas human life was, and is, meant to be revered.
POP CLOCK UPDATE: 115 days have transpired since beginning the thread. If the
figures in post No.1 are within reason, then something like 8,826,480 new arrivals
have checked into the fiery sector of Hades since Dec 15, 2024.
_
FAQ: Are animals considered unbelievers? And if so, will they go to Hell?
REPLY: Neither aqua life, winged life, nor terra life were created in the image and
likeness of God; only mankind has that distinction. And whereas we are told man
has a conscience and a sense of responsibility, we are not told the same about the
Earth's lower forms of life so I think it safe to assume the animal kingdom is
amoral; which can be defined as having or showing no concern about whether one's
behavior is morally right or wrong.
The image and likeness of God also implies a sense of justice, i.e. an inclination to
honor good by penalizing evil.
FAQ: According to Gen 9:5, animals that kill people have to be put down. Doesn't
that imply they can be charged with murder?
REPLY: Well; one can scarcely prosecute an animal for murder when the animal is
incapable of understanding what murder is. But it goes further than that:
In the beginning God said: Let us make man in our image, after our likeness: and
let them have dominion over the fish of the sea, and over the fowl of the air, and
over the cattle, and over all the earth, and over every creeping thing that creepeth
upon the earth.
It is incumbent upon man to protect the dignity of his image and likeness of God
and if that means putting an animal down to do so, then he must or he will
regarding his image and likeness of God as something no more special than the
image and likeness of a lobster or a meerkat.
All in all, I think we have to concede that animal life was, and is, meant to be
expendable; whereas human life was, and is, meant to be revered.
POP CLOCK UPDATE: 115 days have transpired since beginning the thread. If the
figures in post No.1 are within reason, then something like 8,826,480 new arrivals
have checked into the fiery sector of Hades since Dec 15, 2024.
_