GodsGrace
CF Ambassador
pt2;
GOD IS SOVEREIGN OVER EVIL The last view—that God is absolutely sovereign over both natural and moral evil,
Well of course God is sovereign over everything and everyone.
The problem is the understanding we have of the word SOVEREIGN.
Sovereign means that God can control everything....
But to you it might mean something different.
IOW, it might mean that God controls even the particles that fly in the air, as you yourself have stated.
Could you confirm this please?
11 and uses evil for his own glory and the highest good—
God ALLOWS evil,,,He does not use it for His own glory.
If God needs EVIL to glorify Himself in some way,,,then what kind of a sovereign God is He?
He couldn't think of any other way to glorify Himself other than through evil??
James 1:13
Let no one say when he is tempted, “I am being tempted by God,” for God cannot be tempted with evil, and he himself tempts no one.
God does not use evil.
Romans 8:28
And we know that for those who love God all things work together for good, for those who are called according to his purpose.
God works for our good. He does not use evil against us.
Genesis 50:20
As for you, you meant evil against me, but God meant it for good,
God can take evil and make it produce good.
is the only view that can be consistently aligned to the teaching of Scripture. Every other view, deriving from sinful [incapacitated by the noetic effects of sin and willful rebellion against God and his truth] humanistic reasoning, and so calling God and his actions into question, seeks to point out an incoherence in the Christian system.
Not in the CHRISTIAN system...
In the reformed system.
We do see incoherency there.
As is plainly obvious.
These views either deny God and evil, or limit God and seek to bring him down to the finite level and destroy his moral self–consistency—and thus any sufficient or consistent basis for morality.12 The truth of the sovereignty of God over evil may be clarified by the following considerations and implications: • The existence of evil in a universe created and governed by a benevolent God is not incoherent if God has a morally sufficient reason for this evil to exist.
And what might that morally sufficient reason for evil to exist be?
God goes against His own nature for evil to exist for a moral reason?
God goes against His own nature?
So 2 Timoth 2:13 means nothing?
13If we are faithless, He remains faithful, for He cannot deny Himself.
Titus 1:2
2 In hope of eternal life, which God, that cannot lie, promised before the world began;
Hebrews 6:18
18 That by two immutable things, in which it was impossible for God to lie, we might have a strong consolation, who have fled for refuge to lay hold upon the hope set before us:
I can only repeat, if we cannot TRUST GOD,
Then the OT and NT become useless.
GOD IS LOVE.
GOD PROMISED TO SAVE THOSE WHO WOULD BELIEVE IN HIS SON.
You keep saying that you like to use the bible and that WE like philosophy and psychology,This “problem” is more psychological than logical or philosophical.13 Man would rather call God and his actions into question than submit himself in complete trust (Rom. 9:11–24), even to a God who is benevolent in the context of his righteousness.
10 Some of this group hold that God is either working in a utilitarian fashion as best he can, or that he merely foresaw evil and its results, but was not able to prevent them; or that there are some situations brought about by morally free agents that even God did not foresee. While the latter two are somewhat extreme, the idea that God merely foresaw or foreknew evil would not remove culpability from God. If God foresaw what would happen and then laid his plans accordingly, then he could have prevented sins, but evidently chose not to do so. Thus, God would be ultimately responsible for sin by allowing it, yet not controlling it for the highest good and his glory. Further, if God merely foresaw evil as a certainty—and it must have been certain for God to foresee it as such in the biblical sense—then God himself could not have prevented sin. Sin would have existed and been determined by a force outside God. He would thus finitely exist within a “universe” over which he exercised no ultimate control, a “universe” controlled in the final sense by an atheistic determinism!
but it seems that YOU are the one not using the bible and using man's writings instead.