Clement of Rome is one .
Majority isn't one
No just that I can be Jewish and saved.
I made no church isreal seoeration but only that the church has no land or kingdom promise like isreal
Maybe you don't understand what I'm saying then.
Join For His Glory for a discussion on how
https://christianforums.net/threads/a-vessel-of-honor.110278/
https://christianforums.net/threads/psalm-70-1-save-me-o-god-lord-help-me-now.108509/
Strengthening families through biblical principles.
Focus on the Family addresses the use of biblical principles in parenting and marriage to strengthen the family.
Read daily articles from Focus on the Family in the Marriage and Parenting Resources forum.
Clement of Rome is one .
Majority isn't one
No just that I can be Jewish and saved.
I made no church isreal seoeration but only that the church has no land or kingdom promise like isreal
The latter date for revelations recording is correct because revelation itself says the beast did not exist at that time.Date of Revelation | Evidence Unseen
www.evidenceunseen.com
Late date
Two resurrections, the first is Israel and the Israelis who are killed for thier witness of Jesus and who did not worship the beast or its image or recieve its mark. They shall live and reign with Christ in the Lord's land.My Bible says there are two Resurrections and afterwards comes judgement. No stages. No gradual. No piecemeal.
Two resurrections, the first is Israel and the Israelis who are killed for thier witness of Jesus
Maybe you don't understand what I'm saying then.
Darby is part of the Plymouth brethren movement .why is that ?
i have read some of darby not much scholfield i have 2 of his study bibles ..i know how to pick out the meat and throw away the Bones. i am pretty much pre trib. but mostly readyDarby is part of the Plymouth brethren movement .
Are you familiar with that ?no elders,no modern or biblical type elders .
Schofield commentary is very lacking .for a man big on isreal his comments on it are lacking with the end times .
That and he taught as did the early dispensationalism taught after that the law would return and isreal was married to the YHWH,the church to Jesus.
Israel is not in the vine at the moment.. but will be grafted back in..a man big on isreal
i am not reformed theology. dont get me wrong there just as saved as i am .parts in teaching i dont agree with .I figured you were .
My reformed churches ones like me ,others like you .a preterist ,and a jewess who is pre trib ,pre mil
I see isreal as some say confused .Israel is not in the vine at the moment.. but will be grafted back in..
i let God sort it out i have just enough oil take care of my selfMost believers fail to see that.
The great multitude from the nations which come out of great tribulation in rev 6 are saved but not resurrected.so this is all about Israel not those saved ?
Christ had this to say about it. He is the heir.Oh I do .
The church is often taught to be swept up .that modern. Isreal us only the Jews that recieve that land promise to witch I disagree .the apostles didn't say that.t
Look I'm going to state my opinion.
I'm a bit of either here or there on the spectrum of eschatology.
I lean amil ,not sure on pre trib or post trib.yet the response by partial preterusts on the temple attached by Satan is a weak on.the last book isn't so easy to say I got it figured out .
I post my links to point out the early fathers didn't .most were pre mil and little on the ac .very simplistic .
Darby and Schofield I have issues with