Drew
Member
Well stated perhaps. But not Biblical, I suggest."Extremely" well stated!!!!
https://christianforums.net/threads/psalm-70-1-save-me-o-god-lord-help-me-now.108509/
Find out how Christians are supposed to act in the following study
https://christianforums.net/threads/charismatic-bible-studies-1-peter-2-11-17.109823/
Read through the following study by Tenchi for more on this topic
https://christianforums.net/threads/without-the-holy-spirit-we-can-do-nothing.109419/
Join Sola Scriptura for a discussion on the subject
https://christianforums.net/threads/anointed-preaching-teaching.109331/#post-1912042
Strengthening families through biblical principles.
Focus on the Family addresses the use of biblical principles in parenting and marriage to strengthen the family.
Read daily articles from Focus on the Family in the Marriage and Parenting Resources forum.
Well stated perhaps. But not Biblical, I suggest."Extremely" well stated!!!!
Indeed. I did say this and am prepared to argue that this is the position that Paul embraces.Drew said-----The fact that Paul asserts that all men have sinned does not, of course, mean that we cannot be transformed by God and then, through the Spirit, perform good works that ultimately save
Well, Paul says what he says!!Grubal says-----Christ did not die for our sins, then turn around and expect us to "earn" our Salvation through "works."
The same.Drew said:Question: In this text, what is the "thing that is given"?
My answer is "eternal life". What is your answer, please?
The same.Drew said:Question: In this text, what is the basis for getting the thing that is given?
My answer is "what they have done" or "persistence in doing good". What your answer, please?
I disagree.Drew said:we see that, indeed, final salvation is based on how we actually lived our lives.
I disagree and think you are placed in the exceedingly awkward position of having to explain how Paul is speaking hypothetically in Romans 2:6-7 - you appear to be saying that Paul is telling us how eternal life would be given, if it were not given on some other grounds.Romans 2:6-8 speak of the principles of God's judgement. This is the way God will judge. And if we stop here, we are left with only justification by the law as stated in Rom 2:13. But we know that none are justified by the Law as stated in Rom 3:20, rather they are justified by grace through faith in Christ Jesus.
Depending on how you qualify "good works" here - and if it is what I hold to, I'd agree to the above statement as it's been stated. Though I'm pretty sure we are not referring to the same thing here semantically - but that's what we're here to discuss.Drew said:What you appear to be suggesting means that, in Romans 2:6-7 Paul describes a coming judgement at which eternal life is granted based on good works, yet all the while believing nobody gets eternal life in that way.
"But as it is written, Eye hath not seen, nor ear heard, neither have entered into the heart of man, the things which God hath prepared for them that love him."What kind of a confused and misleading writer would Paul have to be to do that?
You've acknowledged one of the reasons here - And people justify such a reading by claiming that Paul later denies "justification by works".Does he given any indication at all, that he is describing a hypothetical path?
What's the difference between "good works" and "works of the Law", according to you?Well he does, but when he refers to "works" in such statements, the context shows he is clearly talking about the works of the Law of Moses - the Torah - and not the category of good works.
Indeed. I did say this and am prepared to argue that this is the position that Paul embraces.
Well, Paul says what he says!!
Why are you not answering the two questions I posed earlier today in post 134.
Let me be clear: I am not saying that we earn salvation through works that have their origin in our own unaided efforts. I am saying that it is the Holy Spirit working in us who produces the works by which we are judged, and consequently saved.
But Paul still means what he says:
6 God “will repay each person according to what they have done.â€[a] 7 To those who by persistence in doing good seek glory, honor and immortality, he will give eternal life.
Please answer the questions from post 134.
If you, or anyone, can explain to me how this text does not mean what it clearly says - that final salvation (eternal) life is based on "what we have done" - then by all means do so.
But I will not let this text drop - please deal with it.
Since the beginning, there have been those who have understood the eternal power of God. They have obeyed the dictates of their conscience as best they could...."patient continuance in well doing." They see the righteousness of God and "live by faith".Romans 2:6:7 said:Who will render to every man according to his deeds: To them who by patient continuance in well doing seek for glory and honour and immortality, eternal life: But unto them that are contentious, and do not obey the truth, but obey unrighteousness, indignation and wrath, Tribulation and anguish, upon every soul of man that doeth evil, of the Jew first, and also of the Gentile; But glory, honour, and peace, to every man that worketh good, to the Jew first, and also to the Gentile:
They were living by faith before they even knew what faith was. Which is, perhaps, why we see this...Romans 1:17-20 said:For therein is the righteousness of God revealed from faith to faith: as it is written, The just shall live by faith. For the wrath of God is revealed from heaven against all ungodliness and unrighteousness of men, who hold the truth in unrighteousness; Because that which may be known of God is manifest in them; for God hath shewed it unto them. For the invisible things of him from the creation of the world are clearly seen, being understood by the things that are made, even his eternal power and Godhead; so that they are without excuse:
Matt. 25: 37-40 said:Then shall the righteous answer him, saying, Lord, when saw we thee an hungred, and fed thee? or thirsty, and gave thee drink? When saw we thee a stranger, and took thee in? or naked, and clothed thee? Or when saw we thee sick, or in prison, and came unto thee? And the King shall answer and say unto them, Verily I say unto you, Inasmuch as ye have done it unto one of the least of these my brethren, ye have done it unto me.
Nah! I think I'll just pass on it...
Well stated perhaps. But not Biblical, I suggest.
I still choose to disagree with you. But, everyone has their own opinion to share. And you had your's on 100...I know you will. Its not much to debate in that post is it ?
You and I have gone round and round with this text, and it would be so good to reach an agreement. We know the Bible does not contradict itself, and I'm sure you'd agree that Paul doesn't either. The problem, therefore, lies with us. In the past, I think I was only looking at one side of the coin, and I'm thinking you have been, as well. By explaining Romans 4 as a metaphor, it seems you may still be. Your persistance has forced me to look a little deeper.
First, we must see that Paul is speaking of only two groups of people. The first are those who seek for glory and honour and immortality, and, second, those who are contentious and do not obey the truth. There isn't a third group of people who are ordained to do good deeds because they have been saved through faith. So where do those people fit in? I submit it has to be in the first group.
Since the beginning, there have been those who have understood the eternal power of God. They have obeyed the dictates of their conscience as best they could...."patient continuance in well doing." They see the righteousness of God and "live by faith".
They were living by faith before they even knew what faith was. Which is, perhaps, why we see this...
Of course. But I see no reason whatsoever to not take Paul literally in chapter 2. You, like others, justify thinking that Paul is speaking hypothetically by asserting that, elsewhere, he denies salvation by good works."But as it is written, Eye hath not seen, nor ear heard, neither have entered into the heart of man, the things which God hath prepared for them that love him."
Just because it seems misleading to some, does not have to mean it is misleading to all, right?
The works of the Law, for Paul, are the specific works of the Law of Moses, and only Jews can do such works precisely because the Law of Moses is for Jews and Jews only."What's the difference between "good works" and "works of the Law", according to you?
This is now the second time I remind you.I'm afraid I disagree with you, my friend...
Agree - In Romans this chunk of Romans 2, Paul has divided humanity into two groups: (1) those who "persist in doing good" and are given eternal life; and (2) those who "do evil" and are subject to wrath.First, we must see that Paul is speaking of only two groups of people. The first are those who seek for glory and honour and immortality, and, second, those who are contentious and do not obey the truth.
I agree - so if they are in the first group, they are saved, as Paul says, according to what they have done:There isn't a third group of people who are ordained to do good deeds because they have been saved through faith. So where do those people fit in? I submit it has to be in the first group.
I am simply pointing out that the Law of Moses is a written code of laws given to Jews and Jews only. So no Gentile can do the "works" of the Law of Moses precisely because it is a set of laws given to Jews only. It is clear that Paul believes this - in the following text he explains that if salvation were based on the Law of Moses, only Jews could be saved:Drew, you said good works are 'general good moral actions'. I would define good works as following the Love laws, and we know love fulfills the law, and while I think it would include 'general good moral actions', it seems like it may be more than that too...like Godly sincere loving actions...action that is purposed, in a natural out-flowing of love kinda way, to promote the Gospel and be a picture of Christ to the receiver. I guess I'm wondering if that's what you mean too...since I would think that it falls into a good and moral action as well.
Drew, regarding Romans 2:6-7, I believe there is a difference between God's Judgment and the Salvation that comes only by faith in Christ. I see no contradictions by Paul in seeing the we will be Judged by our works, as these will determine our rewards in heaven; not whether we are granted heaven to begin with. I don't see that this verse speaks in support of your argument.This is now the second time I remind you.
Please answer the questions in post 134.
Please see post 134 and answer the two questions that are posed there.If one believes in salvation then that is because of faith in Christ.
I think through one's own personal relationship with the Lord, we find out what God's will is for us & what He would have us do. Our consciences (spirit mind) & hearts guide us along the way.
Good works should be a trait of a Christian. But salvation is a free gift. We don't earn our way for something that is free for all who thirst........
Hello Mike:Drew, regarding Romans 2:6-7, I believe there is a difference between God's Judgment and the Salvation that comes only by faith in Christ. I see no contradictions by Paul in seeing the we will be Judged by our works, as these will determine our rewards in heaven; not whether we are granted heaven to begin with. I don't see that this verse speaks in support of your argument.
Yes I do.Do you believe we will be rewarded in heaven for the good that we do? In other words, will some enter heaven who don't do as much good as others?
How does this challenge my premise? I am the one who is taking the text "as it reads" - we are given eternal life - that is exactly what Paul says - according to what we have done. This is, again, exactly what Paul says.This is a tough one for your premise, but if some are Granted heaven with less rewards, how much good must they do to be Granted heaven in the first place? The one who understands Salvation by faith says "none". And that's easy to quantify. :yes