Sorry, it does look confusing.
The question marks aren't intended to indicate confusion but are a response to error.
God's doctrine of justification is through works of faith.
We are saved by grace through faith and justified by faith through works.
Nope. I've already explained why from Scripture.
We are justified - perfectly justified, as God requires -
only by the perfect righteousness of Christ. It is solely on the basis of his perfect righteousness that we are acceptable to God. Our own practical righteousness is a pale, weak shadow of Christ's perfect righteousness, and is often shot through with corrupt motives of self-righteousness, fear, duty, selfishness, guilt, etc. We have no hope, therefore, of being righteous enough to please God and thus secure our membership in His family and kingdom. Attempting to do so is to attempt to add to the atoning work of Christ and to say to God that Christ's sacrifice was not sufficient, it was incomplete, requiring our feeble contribution of "good deeds" to be effective in its redeeming purpose. As far as I'm concerned, this is sheer blasphemy and a dreadful insult to the Spirit of Grace. (
Romans 3:20-24, 28; Romans 5:1; 1 Corinthians 1:30; Galatians 2:16; Titus 3:5-7, etc.)
God's definition of faith without works, is faith alone. All such faith is dead to God. It's called dead faith alone without works.
Such faith is "dead" insofar as it is
inactive, failing to generate corresponding deeds, but this doesn't equate to lost salvation. Which is why James never wrote anything like, "If you don't act on your faith by doing good works, you will cease to be saved." Instead, he wrote of faith being "dead" in the sense that it existed by itself:
James 2:17
17 Even so faith, if it has not works, is dead, being alone.
Nowhere in James' letter does he ever assert that a "dead" faith, a faith standing alone, meant salvation lost. Such an idea must be
imposed on what he wrote, not
drawn from his words.
That's why the gospel of salvation and justification by faith without works is false, because it trusts in our own faith alone to save and justify ourselves, without doing any works of God and His righteousness.
No, justification by faith doesn't locate justification in a person's faith but in the OBJECT of their faith: Jesus Christ. Such a view of justification is entirely biblical. See above.
God says no man can be saved by their own faith alone, though many try to believe and preach it.
I've been a Christian for fifty years and I've never heard anyone preach that is the believer's
faith that saves them. Their salvation is a Person, Jesus Christ, not their faith. (
1 John 5:11-12; John 14:6, Acts 4:12)
It's really just a Christianized version of the world's fantasy, that if we believe something, then that alone makes it true. That's childish delusionalism.
And it is also a Strawman version of what the average person holding to justification-by-faith believes.
It is true, that if we can believe it, we can achieve it, but only if we do what is necessary. The idea of something being true, just because we believe it alone, is strong delusion.
Again, I know of no fellow believer who thinks this way about the doctrine of justification by faith.
Do you believe it is even possible for Christians to do the righteousness of God daily and walk as Jesus walked in the flesh?
That depends upon what you mean by "walk as Jesus walked." I'm not Jesus, who made the universe, and atoned for all the sin of mankind, and rose from the dead. Neither are you.
There is no 'by product' of faith. Paul declares the faith of God is to be obeyed. (Rom 1) Though we are compared to plants of God, we are not plants that just grow naturally of themselves.
Well, obviously, I disagree about good works not being the "by products"
of spiritual regeneration, which is what I actually wrote, not "by products
of faith." Also, simply asserting your point of view in contradiction to mine doesn't justify your view, nor does it negate mine.
It's not true that we are saved by grace, but not by means of grace.
And likewise it's not true that we are justified by works, but not by means of works.
'By' means by means of, else 'by' has no real meaning.
??? I have no idea what you're going on about here...
Anyone trying to see saved by works means by means of works, but justified by works does not mean by means of works, is just playing dishonest word games with God and His words.
Nowhere in the NT will you read that a person is justified, in a born-again sense, by works.
Jesus' comparison of us being branches is to show what happens to the dead branches that bear no fruit. It's not a statement that we 'naturally' bear fruit, without purposely working to do so by faith.
As I explained from the passage in
John 15, the "branches" are of two kinds: saved and lost, not of one kind of branch that could be saved at one point and then lost at another.
Peter declares we must be diligent to add such works of virtue, godliness, and charity to our faith, in order not to remain unfruitful dead branches cast into the fire. (2 Peter 1)
in 2 Peter 1, the apostle Peter wrote nothing about "dead branches cast into the fire"; he wrote only of "barren and unfruitful branches" (
2 Peter 1:8).
People can play with a doctrine of faith alone without works all they wish in this life, but no such dead faith will raise themselves bodily from the dead unto everlasting life.
Again, this is a Strawman of what the doctrine of justification by faith teaches. No one I know who holds to this doctrine, clearly spelled-out in Scripture, thinks that it is grounds for neglect of right living. When I echo God's word which says we are saved apart from works, I don't mean that good works have no place AT ALL in Christian living. That's just silly.
Being resurrected bodily unto life with God and the Lamb forever, is our inheritance by reward.
Nope. Those who receive a "reward" from God at the Final Judgment are those who are already His own, who are born-again and have been serving Him well as such. Salvation is not the reward but the necessary predicate to any reward. (
Matthew 5:11-12; Matthew 16:27; 1 Corinthians 3:8-15; Revelation 22:12, etc.)
And this is false translation, for sake of the false doctrine of faith alone without works.
The preposition is not 'for' nor 'unto', as in some time lapse between faith and works. The accurate trasnlation is upon, at, by, and through. And specifically in matters of time, it is at the time of.
Both Strong's and Thayer's Bible lexicons confirm the translation of the preposition
"epi" (Greek)
in Ephesians 2:10 as "unto." And so, the translation of
epi in
Ephesians 2:10 in the vast majority of the 60-some English translations I've looked at, render
"epi" either as "for" or "unto." The rest translate the verse in such a way as to make it clear that good works follow after salvation as
the effect of it, not as
the means of salvation.
Not one of them renders "epi" as "through," which, of course, stands to reason, since other verses, written by Paul, explicitly forbid such a rendering.
2 Timothy 1:9 (NASB)
9 who has saved us and called us with a holy calling, not according to our works, but according to His own purpose and grace which was granted us in Christ Jesus from all eternity,
Titus 3:5-7 (NASB)
5 He saved us, not on the basis of deeds which we have done in righteousness, but according to His mercy, by the washing of regeneration and renewing by the Holy Spirit,
6 whom He poured out upon us richly through Jesus Christ our Savior,
7 so that being justified by His grace we would be made heirs according to the hope of eternal life.
In light of the fact that the general consensus of English Bible translators (many of them experts in ancient Greek) opposes your view of "
epi" in
Ephesians 2:10, I see no reason to think that the way the verse is rendered in my KJV, NKJV, NASB, or ESV versions is false in the least.