glorydaz said:
francisdesales said:
No, they were saved by their repentance, their calling upon the name of the Lord. The issue is whether they REMAINED in that "calling upon the Lord". If they deny the Lordship in their lives, they are not calling upon the name of the Lord, they have no faith in God. This says ABSOLUTELY NOTHING about whether they EVER had this faith.
Nor does saying because they'd escaped the pollutions of the world they'd repented.
The verse said they turned from the holy commandment. That tells me they never repented.
They'd turned from the commandment to repent.
First, let me re-post the verses in question...
For if after they have escaped the pollutions of the world through the knowledge of the Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ, they are again entangled therein, and overcome, the latter end is worse with them than the beginning. For it had been better for them not to have known the way of righteousness, than, after they have known [it], to turn from the holy commandment delivered unto them. But it is happened unto them according to the true proverb, The dog [is] turned to his own vomit again; 2 Peter 2:20-22
Again, you are just simply denying something without giving me any subsequent alternate means by which they OBEYED the commandments...!!!
The Scriptures CLEARLY state that they obeyed the commandments, followed the ways of holiness. We know this because it says they TURNED from the obedience of the commandments. They FOLLOWED the ways of holiness...
Can you give me an alternate means by which we can obey the commandments of God, become holy and escape the pollutions of sin???
HOW CAN THEY NOT have repented, in this situation? Obeying the commandments and walking a walk of holiness and obedience to God DEMANDS that we repent.
The IDEA of repentance IS TO CHANGE...
I cannot see how you can make the claim that there is no repentance here. It very clearly says "RETURN TO THE VOMIT, their FORMER lifestyles. Thus, with a slight amount of thinking, it should be very obvious that they DID repent and CHANGED their life styles, from one of "vomit", to one of holiness.
HOW EXACTLY DO YOU PROPOSE THIS HAPPENED WITHOUT THE SPIRIT OF GOD, WITHOUT REPENTANCE AND CALLING ON THE NAME OF THE LORD?
Doesn't Acts say there is NO OTHER name under the heaven by which we can be saved - freed from sin??? How ELSE did they then escape the pollutions of sin and walk a walk of holiness???
glorydaz said:
Escaping from the pollutions of the world simply means they were captives who'd been set free by the work of the cross, as all men are.
WHAT???? The Scriptures say that the works of Christ are
available to men, but are not universally
applied to men. They must REPENT
first before they are freed from sin!!! NOW, you are changing your tune! First, the above were not saved, NOW, everyone is saved WITHOUT ANY REPENTANCE.
Make up your mind, please...
How can a Christian make such a silly claim??? We see it all around us - people who are NOT freed by the works of the cross, YET. We are not freed from sin, UNTIL we repent. That is BASIC Christianity...
.
glorydaz said:
They heard the gospel, but never took the step of faith necessary for salvation. They went to church, they gave money to the poor, they even shared the gospel with their friends. They taught doctrine in the churches, they stopped beating their wives...on and on. They were professing Christians walking in the flesh.
You don't share the Gospel with others, give money to the poor and do works of love WITHOUT saying you repented. All of these actions ARE repentance - a change of life. You can't do any of that until the Spirit of God comes to the
repentant person. Again, you are saying something without any evidence from Scriptures. Repentance is an act of changing one's lifestyle, rejecting sin and choosing (by God's grace, no OTHER WAY) to do works of love.
Again, you presume that these works of love are self-generated and ignore the signs in front of your face of a person repenting...
glorydaz said:
Knowing the "way of righteousness," is a far cry from knowing God.
They had been exposed to the Gospel...nothing more.
They profess that they know God; but in works they deny him, being abominable, and disobedient, and unto every good work reprobate.
First, "knowing" is much more than book knowledge. How you have so quickly forgotten/ignored this. And clearly, 2 Peter 2 says they were righteous BY FOLLOWING THE WAYS OF RIGHTEOUSNESS, not just by "knowing them" like finding them in a textbook... By
obeying the commandments, they are not just expressing "book knowledge"...
glorydaz said:
You make too much of their "knowing righeousness"...in order to support your doctrine, you assume it's the same way a believer knows God. There is "knowing" and there is "knowing the way of". But when you look honestly at the entire chapter, you will see it is not speaking of those who have lost their salvation. Those people never had it to begin with.
you are simply in denial because you are doing a poor job of explaining away what the Bible clearly says here. You pretend to know the inner life of another person - and ironically, do not even know your own walk... This is the result of OSAS.
Let me explain. What happens if YOU PERSONALLY were to fall away in 2015? Does that mean that RIGHT NOW, you were "never saved to begin with"??? What sort of security is this??? None. You don't even know if YOU CURRENTLY are REALLY in Christ, despite your "walk", since by definition, a Christian who falls away was NEVER KNOWN by Christ (although by "magic", I suppose, he followed the commandments, walked a way of holiness, and abandoned a life of sin. Whatever...)
The people of 2 Peter 2
FOLLOWED the ways of righteousness, not just "knew" about them. They
ESCAPED the pollutions of the world, they didn't just "know" about the pollutions of the world. They
LIVED a life of holiness, and NO ONE shall see God without this holiness. NO ONE, according to several Scripture citations.
Merely saying they "never had it to begin with" is just a silly attempt to explain away the failure of OSAS... Sort of like saying "its dark outside" when it is noon at the equator. It is simple denial of an obvious fact - a denial that will not go away because of your emotional idolatry to a false gospel...
If someone escapes the life of perdition, becomes holy in the sight of God, follows the ways of righteousness - but then returns to their former life, you CLAIM they never had it to begin with...???
Beware that you don't fall, since then the other OSAS will say you never had Christ to begin with - thus, you being in Christ NOW may just be a farce, you over-active imagination - IF it can be taken away and judged to have never happened.
Ridiculous... If you have Christ NOW, you know. NO ONE can take that away, not even the silly OSAS's proud declarations of other people...
The issue is to REMAIN in Christ, not whether you EVER had Christ...
glorydaz said:
Even the demons know God and His righteousness.
How many of the demons FOLLOW THE WAYS OF RIGHTEOUSNESS??? How many of them repented and changed from a life of vomit (which Peter says those who were wicked had done BEFORE)
The demons are perfect examples of FALLING AWAY into a life of perdition!!! By your example, you condemn you "theology"...
glorydaz said:
Here are those who "knew" God, yet glorified him not as God...
No one in 2 Peter is described as "never glorifying God. That is your presumption based upon their CURRENT state, not their past. It says they followed a life of holiness and OBEYED the commandments. Must I remind you - yes, I think so - that ONE of the COMMANDMENTS is to glorify God and worship Him on the sabbath. It doesn't imply ANYWHERE that these people NEVER glorified God...
Regards