Disagree, although we are arguably going on a tangent. I am impressed with the wealth of Biblical evidence that, I suggest, clearly places Jesus as being presently the ruler of this very earth. Here is but one of many arguments that can be marshalled to this effect:
From Acts 4:
On their release, Peter and John went back to their own people and reported all that the chief priests and elders had said to them. 24When they heard this, they raised their voices together in prayer to God. "Sovereign Lord," they said, "you made the heaven and the earth and the sea, and everything in them. 25You spoke by the Holy Spirit through the mouth of your servant, our father David:
"'Why do the nations rage
and the peoples plot in vain?
26The kings of the earth take their stand
and the rulers gather together
against the Lord
and against his Anointed One
Note the context: Peter and John are praying this prayer in response to the actions of the religious leaders. Now the content of the prayer quotes directly from Psalm 2. This is not “co-incidenceâ€. <o>:p</o>:pNote that the prayer quotes Psalm 2, verses 1 and 2:
Why do the nations conspire
and the peoples plot in vain?
2 The kings of the earth take their stand
and the rulers gather together
against the LORDand against his Anointed One.
And what does Psalm 2 go on to say a few breaths later in respect to this "annointed one"?:
I have installed my King
on Zion, my holy hill
Assuming that Peter and John know their scriptures, they know that Psalm 2 describes rebellion against a sitting King. Do you really believe that the Holy Spirit would inspire the writer of Acts to record this prayer, which exactly echoes the Psalm 2 account of rebellion against a sitting King, and not expect us to draw the obvious conclusion – Jesus is indeed that very King, already installed, just as Psalm 2 declares.
<o>:p</o>:p
<o>:p</o>:p
The scriptures are clear and consistent. Even though (obviously) we do not have Jesus with us in person, his Kingship has been established.<o>:p</o>:p