Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Join For His Glory for a discussion on how
https://christianforums.net/threads/a-vessel-of-honor.110278/
Strengthening families through biblical principles.
Focus on the Family addresses the use of biblical principles in parenting and marriage to strengthen the family.
Read daily articles from Focus on the Family in the Marriage and Parenting Resources forum.
No argument here - mere personal attack. The argument is what it is. Please engage it.Cornelius said:I am truly shocked by your lack of faith and understanding. I really am. I do not know who your teachers are, but they will answer to the Lord for what they have done with the Word and with His flock.
Tina said:Every medicine has side effects, and while we are healed of one condition, we end up with another that needs more prayers and healing !
Drew said:No argument here - mere personal attack. The argument is what it is. Please engage it.Cornelius said:I am truly shocked by your lack of faith and understanding. I really am. I do not know who your teachers are, but they will answer to the Lord for what they have done with the Word and with His flock.
Tina said:^
I strongly believe in healing and miracles directly from the Lord because I've witnessed too many of it not to believe.
The Bible says in Matthew 13:58 - "And he did not do many miracles there because of their lack of faith."
God rewards according to our FAITH.
No. You are selectively choosing scenarios to avoid the problem that the testing of Jesus presents you with in respect to your position on healing. There is indeed a distinction in the scenarios - Jesus would need to wilfully toss himself off the temple to test God, while the person with cancer has not intentionally given themselves cancer.GodspromisesRyes said:To say that to have cancer and not go to the doctor is the same as if Jesus would have jumped from a cliff is ludicrious! Now purposely giving yourself cancer and then asking God to heal you would be testing God.
No she is not, she is merely believing God. He is the One who said that we WERE healed. Nothing wrong to believe Him.Huge difference between believing God and testing Him.Drew said:No. You are selectively choosing scenarios to avoid the problem that the testing of Jesus presents you with in respect to your position on healing. There is indeed a distinction in the scenarios - Jesus would need to wilfully toss himself off the temple to test God, while the person with cancer has not intentionally given themselves cancer.GodspromisesRyes said:To say that to have cancer and not go to the doctor is the same as if Jesus would have jumped from a cliff is ludicrious! Now purposely giving yourself cancer and then asking God to heal you would be testing God.
However, this distinction is not relevant in respect to the matter of testing God. We know, for a fact, that chemotherapy (for example), does improve outcomes in many cancers. So to be presented with the option of chemotherapy, and to reject it, is to test God - you are effectively saying to God "By my refusal to take chemotherapy, I am "forcing you" to heal me miraculoulsy, if I am to be healed at all".
By any reasonable standard, this is putting God to the test.
No. You are doing what others are doing here - ascribing to me a belief that I do not hold and then critiquing that belief. You implicitly attribute to me the belief that there is “either-or†choice involved – that either one seeks miraculous healing or one takes the conventional route. But I am not saying this at all. If I were one of those sick people, I would go to Jesus. And I would also have gone to the doctor before Jesus came to town. It is you (and Cornelius) who are framing this as an “either-or†scenario, committing the “faulty premise†error that is behind the famous “have you stopped beating your wife?†question.GodspromisesRyes said:If you are seriously going to say that having an illness and not going to a doctor is testing God, then Jesus should have rebuked every single person who came to him alone for healing except the woman who spent all her money on doctors with no results. You would have to lay fault at the feet of Jesus himself for allowing all these people to come to HIM! You also would need to lay fault at james feet for saying if any is sick amoung you let him to to the ELDERS(not doctors) and they will pray and annoint you and you SHALL be healed.
Drew said:Jesus was very intentionally healing people to symbolically tell the people that in His own life and ministry, the promised deliverance was being brought about.
This, of course, is not at all what is going on. Quite the reverse, actually. Scriptural arguments have been made about Abraham and Israel - how God worked through human agency. Not to mention the example of hardened Israel - again clear example of God achieving His purposes through the agencies of "mere humans". So please do not misrepresent the situation. Scriptural arguments have been presented against your position.GodspromisesRyes said:Now it is clear that alot of people are using their own logic because they do not have any scriptures here to show by example or command that we should do as they say, and they excuse away the tons of scriptures that show all our commands, promises, covenants and examples by holy men and women towards faith and healing by God.
First of all, I suggest that you are simply mistaken if you are telling us that Jesus has appeared bodily and healed people since His ascension. The fact that healings of a miraculous nature still occure does not do any damage to my argument at all. When Jesus was here in person - if a form where His activitly was publically visible to all - He did indeed heal, I suggest, primarily to announce that the Messianic expectation of deliverance was being worked out in His own life and mission.Cornelius said:Strange how Jesus seem to still heal people symbolically these days when I pray for them.
What an absurd and outrageous statement.Cornelius said:Drew said:No argument here - mere personal attack. The argument is what it is. Please engage it.Cornelius said:I am truly shocked by your lack of faith and understanding. I really am. I do not know who your teachers are, but they will answer to the Lord for what they have done with the Word and with His flock.
In reality its very Scriptural to point out unbelief to people. Jesus did so many times.
Drew said:First of all, I suggest that you are simply mistaken if you are telling us that Jesus has appeared bodily and healed people since His ascension. The fact that healings of a miraculous nature still occure does not do any damage to my argument at all. When Jesus was here in person - if a form where His activitly was publically visible to all - He did indeed heal, I suggest, primarily to announce that the Messianic expectation of deliverance was being worked out in His own life and mission.Cornelius said:Strange how Jesus seem to still heal people symbolically these days when I pray for them.
This is the message that the healings were intended to convey, certainly not that we are to reject medical technology.
As far as not being a believer, I think you would agree that you are not a believer in the fact that God wants to heal us all the time though His power.(Not taking about being a believer in Christ ) If I am mistaken then I apologize.Drew said:It is exceedingly hard to engage in a serious discussion when Biblical arguments that I provide are met with "you are not a believer" - no attempt to engage the argument, just simple dismissal of me. I thought that the TOS encouraged us to engage issues, not people.
You are indeed mistaken. You ascribe this belief to me because you think that this is an either-or choice - that either we get healed through medecine or we get healed by God.Cornelius said:As far as not being a believer, I think you would agree that you are not a believer in the fact that God wants to heal us all the time though His power.(Not taking about being a believer in Christ ) If I am mistaken then I apologize.Drew said:It is exceedingly hard to engage in a serious discussion when Biblical arguments that I provide are met with "you are not a believer" - no attempt to engage the argument, just simple dismissal of me. I thought that the TOS encouraged us to engage issues, not people.
Drew said:You are indeed mistaken. You ascribe this belief to me because you think that this is an either-or choice - that either we get healed through medecine or we get healed by God.Cornelius said:As far as not being a believer, I think you would agree that you are not a believer in the fact that God wants to heal us all the time though His power.(Not taking about being a believer in Christ ) If I am mistaken then I apologize.Drew said:It is exceedingly hard to engage in a serious discussion when Biblical arguments that I provide are met with "you are not a believer" - no attempt to engage the argument, just simple dismissal of me. I thought that the TOS encouraged us to engage issues, not people.
The Bible tells us that God feeds the little birds. Do you believe this? Is God not feeding the little birds simply because He uses the agency of the parent bird? I suggest that we all know the answer to this. And that answer undermines your presumption of an "either-or" choice, because, to maintain your position, you would deny that God could use "plain old birds" to "heal" the baby birds of their need for food. And yet He clearly does.
God generally works through His creation, not around it.