First explains there is one God, and there is one mediator Christ Jesus... I do not try to assume it means anything more then what it actually says, each scripture reveals a little bit more information.
First explains there is one God, and there is one mediator Christ Jesus... I do not try to assume it means anything more then what it actually says, each scripture reveals a little bit more information.
I'm not trying to be problematic, thank you for your patience, because this is a very hard subject for me, and I don't want to say any incorrect information.
The first scripture I listed was Jesus having a private conversation with his disciples, and I thought it was very appropriate for this subject, "Jesus identity" and in the conversation with his disciples Simon Peter speaks out, and Jesus affirms Peter's words we're correct.
So to me what do I get out of this? What is the point of this conversation?
Peter refers to Jesus as the Son of the Living God. And Jesus confirms his words.
So I use this conversation as scriptural evidence to put faith in Jesus as the son of the Living God, and a different scripture will give me a little more information.
The first scripture I listed was Jesus having a private conversation with his disciples, and I thought it was very appropriate for this subject, "Jesus identity" and in the conversation with his disciples Simon Peter speaks out, and Jesus affirms Peter's words we're correct.
So to me what do I get out of this? What is the point of this conversation?
Peter refers to Jesus as the Son of the Living God. And Jesus confirms his words.
So I use this conversation as scriptural evidence to put faith in Jesus as the son of the Living God, and a different scripture will give me a little more information.
You also agreed with me in post #73 (HERE), that Jesus was claiming to be I Am, which is a claim to be God in the flesh. Do you agree that Jesus claimed to be God in human flesh, although he never claimed to be the Father?
You also agreed with me in post #73 (HERE), that Jesus was claiming to be I Am, which is a claim to be God in the flesh. Do you agree that Jesus claimed to be God in human flesh, although he never claimed to be the Father?
I am sorry I do not believe in the [ I am ] commentary explanation. I put stock in what Jesus explains in his own words, not something that is assumed about Jesus words. The Two words I am are used throughout the Bible.
If you want to talk about this scripture later, I have looked up a lot of evidence on it, and would be happy to discuss it with you.
I am sorry I do not believe in the [ I am ] commentary explanation. I put stock in what Jesus explains in his own words, not something that is assumed about Jesus words.
If you want to talk about this scripture later, I have looked up a lot of evidence on it, and would be happy to discuss it with you.
I totally agree with John 8:58, but if you look at many other translations, Jesus is replying that he existed before Abraham.. You are saying he is the great "I am" From the book of Exodus, correct?
But Jesus is saying much more than that, as given by the grammar. To say that Jesus is merely claiming to have existed before Abraham doesn't make sense based on what Jesus says.
But Jesus is saying much more than that, as given by the grammar. To say that Jesus is merely claiming to have existed before Abraham doesn't make sense based on what Jesus says.
I cannot agree with you I cannot add any extra meaning to what Jesus says. Bible translators do not agree that Jesus is talking about the great "I am" in Exodus. Just a few verses before and after use the same exact phrase "I am" and the blind man uses the phrase too.
Which means he existed before creation of time and space; that is what that means, not simply that he existed before the world was created. That is a claim to eternal preexistence, or absolute existence, which is what only God has.
That's the issue though--I am not adding any extra meaning. To say that Jesus was only saying he existed before Abraham makes no sense of the grammar. Jesus said "before Abraham was, I am," not "I was" or "I existed."
It is those who say that Jesus was only saying "before Abraham was, I was [or I existed]," that are removing from the text.
Which means he existed before creation of time and space; that is what that means, not simply that he existed before the world was created. That is a claim to eternal preexistence, or absolute existence, which is what only God has.
That's the issue though--I am not adding any extra meaning. To say that Jesus was only saying he existed before Abraham makes no sense of the grammar. Jesus said "before Abraham was, I am," not "I was" or "I existed."
It is those who say that Jesus was only saying "before Abraham was, I was [or I existed]," that are removing from the text.
That's a wrong translation, since "born" is not a word Jesus used there. The wording is literally, "Said to them Jesus Truly truly I say to you before Abraham was I am."
Please I don't want to debate about any scriptures, I provided the 16 scriptures, and those are the words of Jesus and the apostles, and I believe them, are they not enough evidence for me to believe what they say?
Who is the "only true God" ? John 17:3
You have your belief and your scriptures that support it, I have my belief and my scriptures that support my belief.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.