smaller
Member
All sin is demonic. 1 John 3:8 provides no exceptions.Could share with us, from the scriptures what the difference is between sin and "demonic sin"?
JLB
Join For His Glory for a discussion on how
https://christianforums.net/threads/a-vessel-of-honor.110278/
https://christianforums.net/threads/psalm-70-1-save-me-o-god-lord-help-me-now.108509/
Read through the following study by Tenchi for more on this topic
https://christianforums.net/threads/without-the-holy-spirit-we-can-do-nothing.109419/
Join Sola Scriptura for a discussion on the subject
https://christianforums.net/threads/anointed-preaching-teaching.109331/#post-1912042
Strengthening families through biblical principles.
Focus on the Family addresses the use of biblical principles in parenting and marriage to strengthen the family.
Read daily articles from Focus on the Family in the Marriage and Parenting Resources forum.
All sin is demonic. 1 John 3:8 provides no exceptions.Could share with us, from the scriptures what the difference is between sin and "demonic sin"?
JLB
...freed from the sin nature. It's power to hold you captive to do it's bidding, like a husband over a wife, has been broken. The only reason he can hold any power over us, his former wife, is because we foolishly and/or ignorantly allow him to. We catch a glimpse of an old photograph of him laying around the house and we suddenly hear his voice from the grave in our minds and old temptations get stirred up inside of us again urging us to submit in obedience to him again. But through knowledge we can learn to resist that voice and recognize it as a lying voice because husband Jesus has assured us that we are not in marital bondage to that old husband anymore, and because that's true we don't have to do listen to his voice from the grave anymore.you seem to say that we've been freed from sin.
We have been freed from the law, but just not in the way you and most in the church say we have been. We have been freed from the condemnation of the law. Why? Because we've been set free from the bondage of the sin nature--the sin nature that compelled us, like a husband over a wife--to do the things that solicit the condemnation of the law:I still say we've been freed from the Law.
No, the law is not the curse in and of itself. Not obeying the law brings the curse prescribed by the law. 'Curse of the law' means the curse that will come on those who do not uphold it. But the church has been taught to hear 'curse of the law' as meaning we're under a set of rules that God expects us to obey. God still expects us to fulfill the law. And now that we're married to husband Jesus, we can do that and not come under the curse, the condemnation, of the law.You say the law is only a curse in that it exposes and magnifies mankind's sin.
No, the law in the analogy is the legal document that kept us in marital union with sin, like a marriage license keeps a woman in marital union with her husband. When we were married to ex-husband 'sin nature' the law acted like a legal marriage certificate that made it so we could not be with anyone else. We remained slaves to sin. The law, because it provoked and stirred up our relationship with husband sin nature, acted like a marriage certificate that keeps a woman bound to her husband, and prevented us from being joined to another, because it continually stirred up our faithfulness to obey husband sin nature.Paul "die", because the commandment, or law came. It's the law we're married to - it's the law that makes us know sin and let's us be guilty, it's the law that made Paul die.
In context, what Paul is talking about is Jesus took the penalty of the law upon himself. And not so we can now 'not have to keep the law', as the church so often asserts, but so we can fulfill it. Because while we were in marital bondage to the sin nature we could not be with another husband. The law acting like a marriage certificate that legislated our continuing, mandatory relationship with 'sin nature'.He took all the laws upon Himself so that we would no longer be responsible for following them.
All sin is demonic. 1 John 3:8 provides no exceptions.
The last paart of that verse in not in the best manuscripts and is likely added by a scribe form the later verses. I left it off because it is not there.There is therefore now no condemnation to those who are in Christ Jesus, who do not walk according to the flesh, but according to the Spirit. Romans 8:1 JLB
I disagree. I believe Yeshua meant everything he had to do to save mankind and show them the way of life was finished. The work that his Father gave him to do was finished.John 19:30 What is finished is the death to the old law that killed, that exposed our sins and that was impossible to keep.
What was the weakness or fault found within the covenant of Law the Lord needed a new covenant?
You're first pp is my quote even though the quotes are not there and that's why I'm answering.I do wonder though, which church says we no longer have to keep the law. I don't think any does. Not even the grace movement churches. What they're saying is the above - trouble is that many want to understand it their own way so they could do what they want to. This is not what is meant by "the law is dead." Jesus told the adulteress, "Neither do I condemn you - go and SIN NO MORE."
I would like to ask, when someone says they are or are not under the law, WHAT DO THEY MEAN?
I think the Ceremonial law of Moses and the Governmental law if Israel ARE OVER AND GONE. BUT , the MORAL LAW OF GOD IS FOREVER. I think we can find all the COMMANDMENTS repeated in the NT.
We are still subject to the Moral Law.
But, Paul is saying in RO 7 The illustration here is to teach No matter who or how good you are YOU STILL Need Jesus and Gods Grace to be saved. Paul is saying "I cannot of MY own power do what is needed to be saved. Please do not get lost in the discussion of THE Law and miss Paul's point. Do not over teach the illustration and miss the point of the lesson.
Just my opinion for what it is worth!
I think we agree.I disagree. I believe Yeshua meant everything he had to do to save mankind and show them the way of life was finished. The work that his Father gave him to do was finished.
There is no "old law". The Torah/Law that existed in the "Old Covenant" is to be written on the hearts and minds of believers in the New Covenant (Jer 31:31-33). It certainly was possible to keep the Law since Yeshua did it. Does that mean someone else can keep it perfectly as well? I doubt it. One would have to be filled to the max with the Holy Spirit and totally in tune with the Father's will. He would need to have an intimate knowledge of the Word which I doubt anyone has to the degree that Yeshua did.
He who sins is of the devil, for the devil has sinned from the beginning. For this purpose the Son of God was manifested, that He might destroy the works of the devil.
1 John 3:8
This verse says, "He", (the person) who sins, is of the devil...
The person does the sinning.
James says it this way -
But each one is tempted when he is drawn away by his own desires and enticed. 15 Then, when desire has conceived, it gives birth to sin; and sin, when it is full-grown, brings forth death. James 1:14-15
Each one is tempted... By his own desires...
When that persons desire has conceived, it gives birth to sin.
This is how a born again Christian falls into sin, and consequently ends up losing their salvation if not repented of, because they do in fact have a sin nature, that desires to gratify itself.
The way we have been equipped to fight and overcome is by the divine nature within the believer, filled and empowered by the Holy Spirit, mortifying these desires and deeds by the Spirit.
Therefore, brethren, we are debtors—not to the flesh, to live according to the flesh. 13 For if you live according to the flesh you will die; but if by the Spirit you put to death the deeds of the body, you will live. Romans 8:12-13
This was a statement by the Apostle Paul, to Christians.
Christians have a choice to live according to the sinful desires of the flesh or to live according the Spirit.
JLB
the MORAL LAW OF GOD IS FOREVER.
Hey old friend, I'm not sure that I agree with this statement of yours without more information...."This is how a born again Christian falls into sin, and consequently ends up losing their salvation if not repented of, because they do in fact have a sin nature, that desires to gratify itself."
My goodness, this "loosing Salvation" has just about been beaten to death around here. Personally, I don't believe that un-repented sin will drive a person to the Lake of Fire. They will loose rewards, but not Salvation. There is no statement in Scripture that lists the amount of un-repented sins that might send a Christian to the LoF, therefore it's not a valid statement.
When we finally stand before our Savior Jesus the Son of God, we will be shocked by our sins that were not repented of. Our minds have a unique way of shutting out negative thoughts. It's called "denial". We sometimes forget the power that the evil one has over our minds to keep us from bringing glory to Jesus our Lord. Denial of committed sins is one of his tricks.
I think you know that I, in no way, believe that a true Believer in Jesus the Son of God, will ever loose their Salvation. So my friend, you might qualify your statement so we won't believe something that you don't really believe, or maybe you do believe it?
I will answer this extremely important question with scripture, if Jethro will allow this in his thread, if not we can open a thread.
In short, I will ask you if you think James is writing to Christians or the world in these passages?
12 Blessed is the man who endures temptation; for when he has been approved, he will receive the crown of life which the Lord has promised to those who love Him. 13 Let no one say when he is tempted, “I am tempted by God”; for God cannot be tempted by evil, nor does He Himself tempt anyone. 14 But each one is tempted when he is drawn away by his own desires and enticed. 15 Then, when desire has conceived, it gives birth to sin; and sin, when it is full-grown, brings forth death. James 1:12-15
JLB
Trying to get out the door this morning, so I haven't dug into it yet, but I think we should open another study to cover this.I'm hoping that Jethro will allow this as well JLB or perhaps you could frame a new thread that would be a little different than all others that have been presented.
Hebrews 8:7-13
For if that first covenant had been faultless, then should no place have been sought for the second. For finding fault with them, he saith,
The first covenant, the old covenant, the covenant of Laws was found to have a fault. The Law is certainly an authority, but it has a flaw and waxes old ready to vanish away.
What was the weakness or fault found within the covenant of Law the Lord needed a new covenant?
Christians have a choice to live according to the sinful desires of the flesh or to live according the Spirit.
JLB