S
Squeakybro
Guest
I had a very nice weekend. I dont know what you mean. I guess my walk was alot like Pauls.
Join For His Glory for a discussion on how
https://christianforums.net/threads/a-vessel-of-honor.110278/
https://christianforums.net/threads/psalm-70-1-save-me-o-god-lord-help-me-now.108509/
Read through the following study by Tenchi for more on this topic
https://christianforums.net/threads/without-the-holy-spirit-we-can-do-nothing.109419/
Join Sola Scriptura for a discussion on the subject
https://christianforums.net/threads/anointed-preaching-teaching.109331/#post-1912042
Strengthening families through biblical principles.
Focus on the Family addresses the use of biblical principles in parenting and marriage to strengthen the family.
Read daily articles from Focus on the Family in the Marriage and Parenting Resources forum.
I think mine was probably more like Peter's... always putting my foot in my mouth!Squeakybro said:I had a very nice weekend. I dont know what you mean. I guess my walk was alot like Pauls.
SB,Squeakybro said:I still dont know what you mean. But 25 years ago I opened a bible. Because I wanted to know what love was. I started reading and the first thing I read was God hates pride and wisdom and knowledge is a gift. So I kept putting it in until it started coming back out. Then after afew years I would ask questions and I would get a verse. The Holy Spirit was answering my questions with the verses. Then I asked well how can I know the Holy Spirit and not be deceived. He gave me this
John 14:26
26 "But the Helper, the Holy Spirit, whom the Father will send in My name, He will teach you all things, and bring to your remembrance all things that I said to you.
(NKJ)
After that I started trusting Him and relying on Him. And it has been that way for 20 years. He has never been wrong yet.
SB,Squeakybro said:you said
Tell us about how you came to believe that Jesus Christ is not God. (I'm not looking to attack, just understand.)
I said
I didnt come to believe that, I always believed that. I wasnt enfluenced by any denomination or peer presure or relatives into believing in the trinity. So I didnt have to accept theories like the trinity. I turned to the Lord myself when He called and believed what I read. Everyone I know that does believe in the trinity got their start on it from someone else not from the Word of God. They couldnt because it isnt in scripture.
Squeakybro said:you said
Thx. I guess you haven't met anyone then, who came to believe in Jesus Christ, and from reading scripture, assumed that saying he is the Son of God meant He is God?
I said
You should reread this. I am the one that says Jesus IS NOT God.
Squeakybro said:Everyone I ever met that believed in the trinity had to get it from someone else. Because it isnt in scripture. The word trinity isnt in scripture. The word deity isnt in scripture, the word divinity isnt in scripture. And I dont think any of them have ever looked up the definition of the word deity or divinity. Even the word divinity means that Jesus isnt God. Jesus is inferior to God.
deity 1 a: often cap : divine nature or rank: the essintial nature of a god or of a supreme being: DIVINITY
di-vin-i-ty 1:the quality or state of being divine: nature or essence of God: GODHEAD (the divinity of Jesus) a celestial being inferior to the supreme God but superior to man<one of the subservient divinities>
Freegrace do you know what this means?
Matt 23:24
24 "Blind guides, who strain out a gnat and swallow a camel!
SB,
This seems to be going downhill rapidly. The idea here is not to win some debate. The idea is that we must all stand before Christ one day. That is a serious issue then. Just who you believe Jesus Christ to be has serious consequences. I do not wish to get involved in give-and-take put-downs.
Squeakybro said:you said
Again, you ignored my arguments which refuted your point.
I said
I didnt ignore you. I gave you the Word that the Holy Spirit gave me. I think maybe you dont understand the difference between the milk and the meat. The meat has to be done with the verses not opinions. You think you are disputing what I shared with you with your opinion. That cant be done in the meat. You think your opinion is valid but it isnt if you are ever going to get in the meat understanding.
God doesnt send anyone to minister for Him carnally.
Sanctified is the washing of water by the Word(verses). Carnal knowledge is not what we rely on. If we dont have the Word then where are we getting our knowledge?
But if we have the Holy Spirit we can know as a guarantee where the knowledge is coming from.
Your putting your faith in human wisdom and not in the Spirit.
If you trust in your human wisdom your still in the flesh and carnal.
If I understand your point correctly, you're saying Jesus is claiming that his birth precedes Abraham becoming a great nation. Why then would the Jews respond by trying to stone Jesus?
<snip> Removing interpretation from the analytical process makes all grammatical constructions of this small size ambiguous. I'll grant you that we have to make sure the grammar supports the interpretive questions; but the questions hone the meaning of the text which is what we're really after. I'm also not disparaging your interpretive questions, I just don't think the text supports where you're heading. Why can I say that?
I've pretty much come to the conclusion that John is a highly structured book. John 8:56-58 is but a small piece of a much larger structure and if one sees the larger structure, then the ambiguity of vs 58 disappears. (I've noticed a lot of this when I do exegesis--the ambiguity of the grammar simply evaporates when one sees the way the text is structured. It's like there's this "macro-grammar" that disambiguates the "micro-grammar", if you will.)
A while ago I was trying to figure out why 8:30-32 appeared to not cohere with the surrounding text; I noticed some intriguing things. Vs 21 has Jesus going away and the audience not being able to find him.
That syncs up with vs 59 where Jesus slips through the Pharisee's fingers and escapes from the temple. Also, vs 25 asks the question, "who are you?". That syncs up with vs 53 which asks, "who do you claim to be?" The end result of my study was that 30-32 is the center of the chiasm of 8:21-59. The centrality of that text makes a lot of sense to me given the theme of the entire book: 20:30-31.
What that chiasm ends up meaning for our discussion here is that 23-24 syncs up with 54-58. 23-24 says,
Jesus replied, "You people are from below; I am from above. You
people are from this world; I am not from this world. Thus I
told you that you will die in your sins. For unless you believe
that I am he, you will die in your sins." (NET)
That's essentially Jesus claiming to be the Messiah (the Christ) and having come from somewhere else (heaven). The Pharisees respond by wanting him to clarify exactly who he thinks he is--did they understand what they just thought they heard? John (and Jesus) make it clear to the reader that the Pharisees just aren't getting it. Jesus says it will be clear to the Pharisees when they crucify him (vs28). What's he saying? He's saying that the death, burial, and resurrection will prove that Jesus, the Messiah, is "God with us." (cf Phil. 2:5-11, another chiastic structure).
So, noticing this chiastic structure makes 8:56-58 quite clear.
Here's a summary of the (Hebrew - poetic) chiasm of John 8:21-59:
21-22 Pharisses will die and not follow Jesus where he is going.
|
| 23-24 Jesus is from heaven
| |
| | 25 Who are you?
| | |
| | | 25b-29 When you lift up (crucify) the Son of Man (ideal
| | | human being), you will know.
| | | |
| | | | 30-32 Many believed Jesus
| | | |
| | | | / 33-44 The Jews might be Abraham's children,
| | | | | but Abraham would not have wanted to kill Jesus.
| | | | |
| | | -+ 45-46 Jesus is perfectly innocent.
| | | |
| | | | 47-53a Jesus' message is the message from the
| | | | Father and the Jews have no clue what the Father
| | | | is really saying. If they did, they would not die.
| | |
| | 53b Who do you think you are?
| |
| 54-58 Jesus has seen Abraham because he (Jesus) pre-existed
| Abraham.
|
59 Pharisees seek to kill Jesus but he slips away in such a way that
they don't see where he got to.
<snip>
Mike Sangrey
SB,Squeakybro said:your friend Mike Sangrey
Seems to start out with the truth and then through his intellectual reasoning turns it right back around. He should of kept it simple.
Matt 23:24
24 "Blind guides, who strain out a gnat and swallow a camel!
(NKJ)
2 Cor 11:3
3 But I fear, lest somehow, as the serpent deceived Eve by his craftiness, so your minds may be corrupted from the simplicity that is in Christ.
(NKJ)
First-of-all, you are not addressing the fact that the Jews picked up stones to stone Jesus. Why did they do this? Because they believed Him to be blaspheming. How? By claiming to be a man. We have a similar scenario in chapter 10 of John in which again, the Jews understood exactly what He was claiming about Himself and "the Jews took up stones again to stone Him" ( John 10:31). They even explained that the reason they were about to stone Him to death is "because You, being a man, make yourself out to be God" ( John 10:33). When one of His disciples said to Him, "Lord, show us the Father" (John 14:8) , Jesus said to him:
"Have I been so long with you, and yet you have not come to know Me, Philip? He who has seen Me has seen the Father; how do you say, 'Show us the Father'?" (John 14:9)
If I understand your point correctly, you're saying Jesus is claiming that his birth precedes Abraham becoming a great nation. Why then would the Jews respond by trying to stone Jesus?
So, IOW, this is notjust claiming to have a birth before Abraham's (making him extremely old!) but they understood Him to be claiming to be God.)