Nope. Fruit represents deeds or works. Production. If you want to see "people", just look down at the soil. There were 4 types of soils, or people.
The fruit is the seed reproduced.
JLB
Join For His Glory for a discussion on how
https://christianforums.net/threads/a-vessel-of-honor.110278/
https://christianforums.net/threads/psalm-70-1-save-me-o-god-lord-help-me-now.108509/
Read through the following study by Tenchi for more on this topic
https://christianforums.net/threads/without-the-holy-spirit-we-can-do-nothing.109419/
Join Sola Scriptura for a discussion on the subject
https://christianforums.net/threads/anointed-preaching-teaching.109331/#post-1912042
Strengthening families through biblical principles.
Focus on the Family addresses the use of biblical principles in parenting and marriage to strengthen the family.
Read daily articles from Focus on the Family in the Marriage and Parenting Resources forum.
Nope. Fruit represents deeds or works. Production. If you want to see "people", just look down at the soil. There were 4 types of soils, or people.
You said this: "This message that the Lord gave His disciples, is the original message He gave to Adam and Eve.It's a picture of the New Birth.
It's takes people to subdue the earth and have dominion.
You've once again given NO Scripture to support your assumption. And they had NO ability to do that. Aren't you aware that they didn't have any children until AFTER they sinned and corrupted the human race? That removed any ability to "reproduce the incorrupt image of God". Whatever that means.Adam and Eve were to reproduce the incorrupt Image of God.
What does this have to do with my comment?For whoever has, to him more will be given, and he will have abundance; but whoever does not have, even what he has will be taken away from him.
Not at all. The fruit is PRODUCTION from the PLANT. Seeds don't "reproduce". Where do you get that?The fruit is the seed reproduced.
You said this: "This message that the Lord gave His disciples, is the original message He gave to Adam and Eve.
The first words ever spoken to Mankind:
Be fruitful and multiply and have dominion…"
So, my point still stands: apparently you think Jesus commanded His disciples to go and make babies. How silly.
Not at all. The fruit is PRODUCTION from the PLANT. Seeds don't "reproduce". Where do you get that?
Here's the parable:
Seed sown is the Word of God. The gospel by which one is saved when they believe it (Lu 8:12).
Soils are various kinds of people. Soil 1 represents unbelievers. They didn't believe because Satan "stole the seed away, lest they believe and be saved". Lu 8:12
Soil 2 believed and are therefore saved. But they only believed for a while. Therefore, they didn't produce any fruit. iow, they had no works or deeds. Soil 3 believed because we see a plant germinated from the seed, but the cares of life choked out the plants so that there was no production of fruit. Soil 4 wasn't distracted by worries or cares of life and did produce fruit.
Lest you have already forgotten, you claimed that the "first words" to the man and woman were to be fruitful and multiply, meaning make babies. The LORD had already told Adam to till the Garden.The words of the Lord to Mankind, be fruitful and multiply, subdue the earth and have dominion, can only be fulfilled through reproduction.
I sure would like some evidence from Scripture, rather than just your opinion about the matter.Reproducing the Image of God through "birth" is the way God has chosen this work to be accomplished.
So you think the LORD was telling Adam and the woman to evangelize? Please read the Genesis account again.The New Birth is the way children of God are produced.
What does this verse have to do with the discussion?Whoever believes that Jesus is the Christ is born of God, and everyone who loves Him who begot also loves him who is begotten of Him.
1 John 5:1JLB
No, the text does not say the plant died. It withered. That isn't death.The seed sprang up and became a plant, then withered and died.
Likewise??? Your just making another huge assumption. I've proven that the word for "fall away" is middle voice. Man can neither save himself or unsave himself. Salvation is all of God, per Heb 12:2.Likewise those who believe for a while were saved for a while.
No, the text does not say the plant died. It withered. That isn't death.
Likewise??? Your just making another huge assumption. I've proven that the word for "fall away" is middle voice. Man can neither save himself or unsave himself. Salvation is all of God, per Heb 12:2.
I've proven that eternal life is an irrevocable gift of God.
I've proven that eternal life is an irrevocable gift of God.
Man can neither save himself or unsave himself. Salvation is all of God, per Heb 12:2.
You're just assuming again. And remember, this is a parable, not a literal story. Eventually a plant without moisture will die, but that has nothing to do with this parable, which is about producing fruit.6 Some fell on rock; and as soon as it sprang up, it withered away because it lacked moisture.
Luke 8:6
Can plants continue to live without moisture?
Unbelievable!!No scripture, just a huge assumption.
There is NO work involved to be saved. Believing isn't a work. Rom 4:4,5 andf Eph 2:8,9 refute your assumptions.A person must do the work of obeying the Gospel to be saved... which is to believe with their heart and confess with their mouth the Lord Jesus.
Just as I said, there is no mention of work here.9 that if you confess with your mouth the Lord Jesus and believe in your heart that God has raised Him from the dead, you will be saved.
10 For with the heart one believes unto righteousness, and with the mouth confession is made unto salvation. Romans 10:9-10
Wowsers!! Apparently you have also denied this truth as well: But if it is by grace,it is no longer on the basis of works, otherwise grace is no longer grace. Rom 11:6For faith alone can not save.
Where does it say here or anywhere else that faith by itself doesn't save the soul from hell? Nowhere is where. Further, 2:14 isn't about eternal salvation anyway. James used the Greek word for "save" 5 times, none of which refer to eternal salvation. Instead, insert the words "rescue" or "deliver" and then answer the question, "save/rescue/deliver" from what? Most of the time that King David used "save" was in reference to physical deliverance from his many enemies.Thus also faith by itself, if it does not have works, is dead. James 2:17
Eventually a plant without moisture will die, but that has nothing to do with this parable, which is about producing fruit.
However, since you think salvation requires works as well as faith, which isn't orthodox in the slightest, there really is no reason to continue this discussion. My interest is with those who are of an orthodox orientation to Scripture.
Regardless of your repetition, it doesn't make it true. Esp since you haven't shown that Paul was excluding the gift of eternal life when he penned Rom 11:29: the gifts of God are irrevocable. Until you do that, we can safely believe that once a child of God, always a child of God.Those who believe for a while, are saved for a while.
Are you suggesting that Paul's letter to the Romans was not under the inspiration of the Holy Spirit???James wrote these words for us, under the inspiration of the Holy Spirit.
James 2 -
14 What does it profit, my brethren, if someone says he has faith but does not have works? Can faith save him?
17 Thus also faith by itself, if it does not have works, is dead.
19 You believe that there is one God. You do well. Even the demons believe--and tremble!
26 For as the body without the spirit is dead, so faith without works is dead also.
James wrote these words for us, under the inspiration of the Holy Spirit.
James 2 -
14 What does it profit, my brethren, if someone says he has faith but does not have works? Can faith save him?
17 Thus also faith by itself, if it does not have works, is dead.
19 You believe that there is one God. You do well. Even the demons believe--and tremble!
26 For as the body without the spirit is dead, so faith without works is dead also.
Just like the plant that withers and dies, faith without works is dead.
Most know that both Paul and James were inspired. To simplify it:
Paul~~His message is salvation of the soul.
James~~deliverance for the saved soul in the mess of everyday life.
And the believer has deliverance of lifes problems through the Doctrine(faith) that they have studied,learned and apply to lifes problems and victories.
Most look at James and think "overt" works,when most of these works are internal(thinking/faith) and express themselves overtly by what Faith(doctrine) we have.
If we just have the Gospel message faith, can that Babe in Christ faith save us from a smooth talking false teacher? No it can't, but advanced doctrine and the mind of Christ can.
If that is true, then James and Paul were at total odds, given what Paul wrote:You have stated a lot of opinion here in the face of actual scripture.
James 2 -
14 What does it profit, my brethren, if someone says he has faith but does not have works? Can faith save him?
James teaches that faith alone, without works is dead.
It was. And in my opinion 2 words clear it up.....experiential sanctification.I think this is one area the Martin Luther struggled with, right?
And James is absolutely right. But if He is talking salvation to eternal life. He is contradicting Christ and Paul.You have stated a lot of opinion here in the face of actual scripture.
James 2 -
14 What does it profit, my brethren, if someone says he has faith but does not have works? Can faith save him?
James teaches that faith alone, without works is dead.
And James is absolutely right. But if He is talking salvation to eternal life. He is contradicting Christ and Paul.
“Whosoever believes in me will not perish, but have everlasting life.” Jn 3:15
And one thing that often gets overlooked with James is WHO he is writing to.The only solution that makes sense to me is that James wasn't speaking of eternal salvation, but being delivered from something else, which in context, would be hypocrisy.