Jethro Bodine
Member
- Oct 31, 2011
- 23,344
- 5,951
- Thread starter
- #41
I'm of the opinion that 900 sq. ft. is prolly the minimum a couple can reasonably live in. Honestly? This 'tiny house' trend will fizzle out. IMO, it's absurd to think you can live in such cramped quarters for very long when you really don't have to.From a spiritual point of view, I think they 'hit home'.
From a practical point of view - it's a waste of time, because you can't live in one. In the four areas I've lived in in my life, zoning demands that you build much larger.
Where I live now, all homes must be 2200 sq feet. Back in Michigan, I believe the county wide law is 1600 sq ft.
The freedom to live in the home you want to live in is largely gone.
It's an experiment, and one that I think, generally, is fueled by good motives. People are waking up to the foolishness of the excesses we in Western society have been mindlessly indulging these past few decades. But, true to our nature, we tend to overreact when we seek to right wrongs and go to the opposite extreme. We're idiots.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d6410/d6410b7fbcdf902c8380fdcef3ad65b4a1e8d813" alt="006_laugh :lol :lol"