The Word and the Spirit are the same to me. As is the FATHER.
They weren't to John nor the rest of the NT writers. They took great care to not confound the persons.
Distinct in that the Word came out from GOD.
The Word, the Son, was begotten but because he is also God, because a son is always of the same nature as his father, he is said to be eternally begotten. That is just the logical conclusion.
You think one of t three GOD almighties became flesh and was still one third and 100% GOD almighty?!
No, the second person of the one triune God became flesh. There are no thirds in the Trinity. Each person is truly and fully God.
But the flesh profits nothing.
What do you mean by this, especially since you are responding to my statement, "became flesh for the salvation of humans and the redemption of all creation"?
Isnt too odd when you realize one isn't three and man isn't GOD.
It is odd. All three clauses, and indeed all of Scripture, must be taken into account.
The whole bible must be taken into account.
Yes, that is what I have been saying and why the doctrine of the Trinity best takes all that God reveals of himself into account.
Descended from GOD. Son of man. Came out from GOD; not the extent of GOD. But none of that applies if you contend that there are three god almighties.
I don't contend "that there are three god almighties." No trinitarian does.
It follows just fine as it is stated that He was in all was as us, and that we are as his brothers and sisters, and even that we will do even greater works than he. So do you contend that man will do greater works than GOS almighty? Didn't think so.
It doesn't follow. Jesus alone is the God-man, having two natures, perfectly united and not mixed or confused, in the one person.
If you really would like to study with me then hit me up privately about it.
Why? They are relevant to this discussion which we are already having.