justbyfaith: <NO ANSWER, STILL>
I, for one, have no trouble answering this question: Jesus says #1, and He does not say #2. So, why can't you answer this question, justbyfaith? Why can't you say either, "Jesus says #1, and He does not say #2" or "Jesus says #2, and He does not say #1"? I had even tried to make it easier for you by putting the words Jesus says in red letters, just as Jesus's words are put in red letters in Bibles. Yet, you still can't answer the question. Why is that, justbyfaith?
What (if anything) do you mean by your extra-Biblical phrase, "there is only one true God"?
True.
False.
The self-contradictory stupidity you've handed us here is: "The Father IS NOT the Son IS the Father IS NOT the Son IS the Father IS NOT...."
By saying "Yes, the Son is the Father," whether you like to admit it or not, you are indicating that you use your two terms, "the Son" and "the Father" synonymously to denote one and the same subject. So, here is what you have just handed us:
It makes no difference that you have not written the words, "No, the Father is not the Father" and "No, the Son is not the Son", verbatim.
- "Yes, the Son is [the Son]"
- "Yes, [the Father] is the Father"
- "No, the Father is not [the Father]"
- "No, [the Son] is not the Son"
Repeating yourself again, eh? All right, then, again I say: What you are referring to by your phrase, "my definition", is your extra-Biblical assumption of unitarianism.
You do if your Lord is a two (or more)-person Lord bossing you around.
And, as I said, you have ignored my statement of the truth that the Bible assigns no lower nor upper limit to the number of persons a lord can be, just as you have ignored my statement of the truth that the Bible assigns no lower nor upper limit to the number of persons a god can be.
Keep in mind that while being the Son of God, Jesus was also the Son of Mary.justbyfaith: <NO ANSWER, STILL>
I, for one, have no trouble answering this question: Jesus says #1, and He does not say #2. So, why can't you answer this question, justbyfaith? Why can't you say either, "Jesus says #1, and He does not say #2" or "Jesus says #2, and He does not say #1"? I had even tried to make it easier for you by putting the words Jesus says in red letters, just as Jesus's words are put in red letters in Bibles. Yet, you still can't answer the question. Why is that, justbyfaith?
What (if anything) do you mean by your extra-Biblical phrase, "there is only one true God"?
True.
False.
The self-contradictory stupidity you've handed us here is: "The Father IS NOT the Son IS the Father IS NOT the Son IS the Father IS NOT...."
By saying "Yes, the Son is the Father," whether you like to admit it or not, you are indicating that you use your two terms, "the Son" and "the Father" synonymously to denote one and the same subject. So, here is what you have just handed us:
It makes no difference that you have not written the words, "No, the Father is not the Father" and "No, the Son is not the Son", verbatim.
- "Yes, the Son is [the Son]"
- "Yes, [the Father] is the Father"
- "No, the Father is not [the Father]"
- "No, [the Son] is not the Son"
Repeating yourself again, eh? All right, then, again I say: What you are referring to by your phrase, "my definition", is your extra-Biblical assumption of unitarianism.
You do if your Lord is a two (or more)-person Lord bossing you around.
And, as I said, you have ignored my statement of the truth that the Bible assigns no lower nor upper limit to the number of persons a lord can be, just as you have ignored my statement of the truth that the Bible assigns no lower nor upper limit to the number of persons a god can be.
.