Conclusion:
Next let us consider the Sadducees, who they were, and from whence they sprung. These have their name not from צדיק "Saddik righteous" (b), or צדק "Sedek righteousness", being self justitiaries; for though they were, yet this would not have distinguished them from the Pharisees, who were likewise such; but from צדוק Sadok or Saduk, a disciple of Antigonus, a man of Socho (c). The occasion of this new sect was this; Antigonus, among the instructions he gave to his scholars, had this saying;
"be not as servants who serve their master for the sake of reward; but be ye as servants that serve their master not for the sake of reward, and let the fear of God be upon you.''
Which, when Sadok and a fellow scholar, whose name was Baithos, or Baithus, heard, not rightly understanding him, concluded that there was no future state of rewards and punishments; which notion they broached and had their followers, who from the one were called Sadducees, and sometimes from the other Baithuseans: these men held the Scriptures only, rejecting the traditions of the elders; they denied fate, and ascribed all to free will; they affirmed that there is no resurrection of the dead; that the soul dies with the body; that there is no future state after this life, and that there are neither angels nor spirits. Now when "John saw" or observed "many" of both these sects "come to his baptism"; not merely to see it administered, led thither by the novelty of the thing; but to submit to it, to which they might be induced by that very great character of a very holy good man, which John had got among the people; and they were desirous of being thought so too, and therefore desired to be baptized by him; but he knowing the men and their manners,
said unto them; addressed them in a very severe style, quite contrary to their expectation, and the opinion the people had of them,
O generation of vipers! It seems their parents before them were vipers, and they their offspring were like them, in hypocrisy and malice. The viper appears very beautiful outwardly, but is full of poison; it looks harmless and innocent, as if it neither could nor would do any hurt, its teeth being hid, but is a most deadly and hurtful creature: so these men, though they made specious pretences to religion and holiness, yet were full of the deadly poison of hypocrisy, malice, and error. A very disagreeable salutation this must be to men, who were desirous of being reckoned very religious, and who boasted of, and trusted in, their being the seed of Abraham; when they were the children of the devil, the seed of the old serpent, and the offspring of the worst of men, and in whom was verified the proverb, like father like son. John proceeds and asks, saying, "who hath warned you to flee from the wrath to come?" who has suggested this to you? from whom have ye received this hint? who has pointed out the way to you to escape divine vengeance, or the ruin which will quickly come upon you? for by
wrath to come is not meant hell fire, everlasting destruction, from which baptism could not save them; but temporal calamity and destruction, the wrath which in a little time came upon that nation to the uttermost, for rejecting the Messiah, and the Gospel dispensation; from which they might have been saved, had they given credit to Jesus as the Messiah, though only with a bare assent; and had they entered into the kingdom of heaven, or Messiah, the Gospel dispensation, by receiving its doctrines, and submitting to its ordinances, though only externally.
I remember reading about Billy Sunday, an evangelist, I think in the 30s, could be wrong on the date. He preached against alcoholism. He was a famous major league baseball player, thus being popular with the sports fans who loved their booze. It is said that, when he got to the pulpit, he would sometimes start with "You generation of vipers!" :shock Not a friendly start compared with most evangelists, but it worked! :yes
Matthew 3:8 "Bring forth therefore fruits meet for repentance."
There's that favorite word of mine REPENTANCE. When ever I witness to anyone, I usually start by explaining why they are sinners, and how to get relief from original sin and sin in general. I always turns to repentance. If the person is not willing to repent, I know the Holy Spirit has not gone before me. As a Calvinist Evangelist,
I need to know who the Holy Spirit is calling into the body of the Elect. Once I'm assured of that fact, I proceed, and every time, that person comes to Christ and stays there.
Baptism. That ordinance that should follow a genuine belief in Jesus the Christ. I have known pastor's who believe that the believer should be baptized immediately after making their profession of faith. They have Scripture to back them up on that practice. Me? No! I use these verses to cause me to be careful who I baptize. After a person has been "born again" I wait an undetermined amount of time to see any fruit of repentance. Usually I inquire with the family of the new believer to see if they have changed. Upon hearing a positive result, I then counsel that new believer in the importance and identification with the death, burial and resurrection of Jesus. When I am convinced that they intend to make Jesus the Master Owner of their lives, I Baptize him or her.