Christian Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Bible Study WELCOME TO AN IN DEPTH STUDY OF MATTHEW'S GOSPEL.

Love you, too Chopper. Hugs back at you. :)

You Deb. are one of my favorite people. From my stand point, a genuine Woman of God. I mean that, I don't patronize people. When I feel that the Holy Spirit alerts me to the truth about someone, I let them know. Thank you for being my friend in the Lord. Thank you also for your wonderful post's in our studies.
 
Day 6 Friday 9/19/14 Matthew 1:19-25 Continuation.

Mat 1:21 "And she shall bring forth a son, and thou shalt call his name JESUS: for he shall save his people from their sins."

I really like what Albert Barnes had to say about Verse 21. Much better than I could document. The origin of "Barnes Commentary" was e-Sword.

His name Jesus - The name Jesus is the same as Saviour. It is derived from the verb signifying to save, In Hebrew it is the same as Joshua. In two places in the New Testament it is used where it means Joshua, the leader of the Jews into Canaan, and in our translation the name Joshua should have been retained, Act_7:45; Heb_4:8. It was a very common name among the Jews.
He shall save - This expresses the same as the name, and on this account the name was given to him. He saves people by dying to redeem them; by giving the Holy Spirit to renew them Joh_16:7-8; by His power in enabling them to overcome their spiritual enemies, in defending them from danger, in guiding them in the path of duty, in sustaining them in trials and in death; and He will raise them up at the last day, and exalt them to a world of purity and love.
His people - Those whom the Father has given to him. The Jews were called the people of God because he had chosen them to himself, and regarded them as His special and beloved people, separate from all the nations of the earth. Christians are called the people of Christ because it was the purpose of the Father to give them to him Isa_53:11; John_6:37; and because in due time he came to redeem them to himself, Tit_2:14; 1Pe_1:2.
From their sins - This was the great business of Jesus in coming and dying. It was not to save people in their sins, but from their sins. Sinners could not be happy in heaven. It would be a place of wretchedness to the guilty. The design of Jesus was, therefore, to save them from sin; and from this we may learn:
1. That Jesus had a design in coming into the world. He came to save his people; and that design will surely be accomplished. It is impossible that in any part of it he should fail.
2. We have no evidence that we are his people unless we are saved from the power and dominion of sin. A mere profession of being His people will not answer. Unless we give up our sins; unless we renounce the pride, pomp, and pleasure of the world, we have no evidence that we are the children of God. It is impossible that we should be Christians if we indulge in sin and live in the practice of any known iniquity. See 1John_3:7-8.
3. That all professing Christians should feel that there is no salvation unless it is from sin, and that they can never be admitted to a holy heaven hereafter unless they are made pure, by the blood of Jesus, here.

I have indicated what I feel is very important by placing a few of Mr. Barnes' quotes in BOLD.
 
You Deb. are one of my favorite people. From my stand point, a genuine Woman of God. I mean that, I don't patronize people. When I feel that the Holy Spirit alerts me to the truth about someone, I let them know. Thank you for being my friend in the Lord. Thank you also for your wonderful post's in our studies.

Thank you Chopper, your confidence in me means a lot to me.
It is a pleasure for me to be able to learn from so many Godly people on this site.
 
Young's Literal Translation
Act 7:45 which also our fathers having in succession received, did bring in with Joshua, into the possession of the nations whom God did drive out from the presence of our fathers, till the days of David,
Heb 4:8 for if Joshua had given them rest, He would not concerning another day have spoken after these things;

Verses such as these that Barnes mentions is why I like to read Young's along with the KJV.
 
Young's Literal Translation
Act 7:45 which also our fathers having in succession received, did bring in with Joshua, into the possession of the nations whom God did drive out from the presence of our fathers, till the days of David,
Heb 4:8 for if Joshua had given them rest, He would not concerning another day have spoken after these things;

Verses such as these that Barnes mentions is why I like to read Young's along with the KJV.
my grandson name is Joshua Nathan. he asked me what his named meant. so I told him Hebrew It could be Yahoshua. Yeshua,Yeshu. Hosea.Hoshea. all which means Yah saves.
 
Young's Literal Translation
Act 7:45 which also our fathers having in succession received, did bring in with Joshua, into the possession of the nations whom God did drive out from the presence of our fathers, till the days of David,
Heb 4:8 for if Joshua had given them rest, He would not concerning another day have spoken after these things;

Verses such as these that Barnes mentions is why I like to read Young's along with the KJV.

You and I really like these old holy writers. Albert Barnes, John Darby, Jamieson Fausset & Brown, Matthew Henry, and John Gill are my favorites. For a modern writer I like Dr. John MacArthur.
 
yuck, darby.

I have read a time or two from barnes. I think he is amil. I cant remember.

I have come to ignore the different men's eschatology and focus on what I'm studying. There are so few who believe in no rapture, only the final coming of Jesus at the resurrection.
 
Tomorrow's Study: Day 6 Friday 9/19/14 Matthew 1:19-15 Continuation of Verses.

Oh, when I read this, I thought we were going to start studying Matthew backwards. Now, that's taking it slow! Ha ha! Just kidding Chop! I'm the king of typos!

In considering verses 19-25, I guess I've always wondered why such a pivotal turning point in all of Creation seems to be so quickly glossed over. Matthew gives such a detailed account of the genealogy over 18 verses and then writes 6 about all of the events involved in the virgin birth? Of course, we believe that which is recorded is what the Lord wants us to absorb. I wonder why He would give us such a fly-by with very few details. Does anyone else wonder this? Does anyone have any insight or thoughts on why this might be? There seem to be so many important details from the moment Mary has her angelic visit until the birth of Christ.
 
Oh, when I read this, I thought we were going to start studying Matthew backwards. Now, that's taking it slow! Ha ha! Just kidding Chop! I'm the king of typos!

In considering verses 19-25, I guess I've always wondered why such a pivotal turning point in all of Creation seems to be so quickly glossed over. Matthew gives such a detailed account of the genealogy over 18 verses and then writes 6 about all of the events involved in the virgin birth? Of course, we believe that which is recorded is what the Lord wants us to absorb. I wonder why He would give us such a fly-by with very few details. Does anyone else wonder this? Does anyone have any insight or thoughts on why this might be? There seem to be so many important details from the moment Mary has her angelic visit until the birth of Christ.

I'm not sure what you are asking, Mike.
I think the genealogies are important for the Jews and us but as to being 18 verses it wasn't in verses to begin with just many words. But it would take many words to go back through your family generations, as well.
But I do think Matthew was proving that this man Jesus was the Messiah, the King of the Jews. He was the fulfillment of the prophecies of the OT/old covenant.
KJV
Isa 7:14 Therefore the Lord himself shall give you a sign; Behold, a virgin shall conceive, and bear a son, and shall call his name Immanuel.

 
I'm not sure what you are asking, Mike.
I think the genealogies are important for the Jews and us but as to being 18 verses it wasn't in verses to begin with just many words. But it would take many words to go back through your family generations, as well.
But I do think Matthew was proving that this man Jesus was the Messiah, the King of the Jews. He was the fulfillment of the prophecies of the OT/old covenant.
KJV
Isa 7:14 Therefore the Lord himself shall give you a sign; Behold, a virgin shall conceive, and bear a son, and shall call his name Immanuel.
the list is of the firstborn only or those that were given the household. imagine if it was a full list!
 
Oh, when I read this, I thought we were going to start studying Matthew backwards. Now, that's taking it slow! Ha ha! Just kidding Chop! I'm the king of typos!

In considering verses 19-25, I guess I've always wondered why such a pivotal turning point in all of Creation seems to be so quickly glossed over. Matthew gives such a detailed account of the genealogy over 18 verses and then writes 6 about all of the events involved in the virgin birth? Of course, we believe that which is recorded is what the Lord wants us to absorb. I wonder why He would give us such a fly-by with very few details. Does anyone else wonder this? Does anyone have any insight or thoughts on why this might be? There seem to be so many important details from the moment Mary has her angelic visit until the birth of Christ.

Actually, I hadn't thought of that, but now that you bring up this fact, I agree. I have found, so far, that the need for more biblical information about the greatest miracle known to mankind would have been very useful. Somewhere I read, if God had wanted us to know more about the incarnation of the Christ, He would have given it to us. Our Lord really emphasizes the need for faith, for without faith, it is impossible to please God.
 
Had a chapter or a book been written or devoted to His birth.. The feminesation (sp) of Christianity would have been stronger and more so then today.....
 
Day 7 Saturday 9/20/14 Matthew 1:22 & 23 God With Us.

It is an amazing fact to me that in the Hebrew Scriptures (O.T.) a Hebrew named Isaiah announced by prophesy just how to recognize who the Messiah would be, and the Nation of Israel for the most part reject it....that, I don't understand! Perhaps someone could expound on this without going off topic?

A true prophet, one who speaks about future events, must be 100% accurate all the time. Deuteronomy 13:5 says "And that prophet or that dreamer of dreams, shall be put to death." Speaking of a prophet who does not prophesy what the Lord says.

Immanuel which means, God with us, is always true, "Behold, I AM with you always, to the end of the age." The truth of this carries the true believer not only to the end of this age, but into the next, face to face! Oh praise His Holy Name!
 
Perhaps someone could expound on this without going off topic?

The Cross was always God's plan...
Rev_13:8 And all that dwell upon the earth shall worship him, whose names are not written in the book of life of the Lamb slain from the foundation of the world.
 
Back
Top